Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Royalston Community School
District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Royalston Community School

District Information
District:Athol-Royalston (06150000)
Region:Central
Title I Status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.6, Target = 89.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77.6, Target = 89.2 75 or Higher All Students 81.5 78.7 77.6 -1.1 89.2 90.8 229525No Change
High needsCPI = 68.5, Target = 85.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 68.5, Target = 85.4 75 or Higher High needs 75.0 73.2 68.5 -4.7 85.4 87.5 20500Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.1, Target = 80.2 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 77.1, Target = 80.2 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 78.4 78.4 77.1 -1.3 80.2 89.2 513525No Change
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79, Target = 89.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 79, Target = 89.7 75 or Higher White 82.4 78.7 79.0 0.3 89.7 91.2 138850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.3, Target = 85.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 76.3, Target = 85.9 75 or Higher All Students 75.9 77.8 76.3 -1.5 85.9 88.0 189525No Change
High needsCPI = 70, Target = 82.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 70, Target = 82.5 75 or Higher High needs 70.0 70.1 70.0 -0.1 82.5 85.0 255025No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.4, Target = 77.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 76.4, Target = 77.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 75.0 75.0 76.4 1.4 77.1 87.5 483575On Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.6, Target = 86 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 77.6, Target = 86 75 or Higher White 76.0 79.5 77.6 -1.9 86.0 88.0 108825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.1, Target = 84.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 76.1, Target = 84.8 75 or Higher All Students 74.0- 76.1 -3.9 84.8 87.0 36230Declined
High needs -------11--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  76.1---- 88.1-22--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.8 10.5950 11.0 10.5950
High needs 7.1 8.05025 16.7 16.0500
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.9 11.43525 10.3 2.93525
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.5 11.48825 10.8 10.2880
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.5 15.8950 16.0 14.7950
High needs 12.2 8.0500 26.8 20.05025
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.3 11.4350 17.9 14.33525
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.0 17.0880 15.1 13.6880
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.0 0.0230 5.0 4.32325
High needs--11---11-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--22---22-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 32.0 47.0 15.0 51.0No67100Above Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 28.0 34.0 6.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 32.0 48.0 16.0 51.0No61100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 59.0 54.0 -5.0 51.0No6775On Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 57.0 60.0 3.0 51.0No31100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher White 61.5 54.0 -7.5 51.0No6175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03.00-
High needs- 60.03.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.03.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9595100Yes9595100Yes2323100Yes
High needs5050100Yes5050100Yes11---
Econ. Disadvantaged3535100Yes3535100Yes8---
EL and Former EL4---4-------
Students w/ disabilities24---24---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---5-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8888100Yes8888100Yes2222100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles