Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ashburnham-Westminster
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Ashburnham-Westminster

District Information
District:Ashburnham-Westminster (06100000)
Region:Central
Title I Status:Yes
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 94.2CPI = 90.6, Target = 94.2CPI = 90.6, Target = 94.2 90.1 89.3 90.6 1.3 94.2 95.1 57129050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 87.6CPI = 79.9, Target = 87.6CPI = 79.9, Target = 87.6 78.7 77.7 79.9 2.2 87.6 89.4 5739450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.5, Target = 84.8CPI = 86.5, Target = 84.8CPI = 86.5, Target = 84.8 83.4 83.4 86.5 3.1 84.8 91.7 80205100Above Target
EL and Former EL  67.9---- 84.0-31--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 71.1, Target = 81.7CPI = 71.1, Target = 81.7 68.6 70.0 71.1 1.1 81.7 84.3 5922650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 86.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 86.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 86.3, Target = 94.9 91.3 80.2 86.3 6.1 94.9 95.7 714250Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.9, Target = 94.2CPI = 90.9, Target = 94.2CPI = 90.9, Target = 94.2 90.0 89.8 90.9 1.1 94.2 95.0 53120850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.3, Target = 89.2CPI = 88.3, Target = 89.2 81.4 84.3 88.3 4.0 89.2 90.7 67129075On Target
High needsCPI = 76.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 76.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 76.1, Target = 80.6 66.8 70.3 76.1 5.8 80.6 83.4 8639350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.2, Target = 77.9CPI = 81.2, Target = 77.9CPI = 81.2, Target = 77.9 75.9 75.9 81.2 5.3 77.9 88.0 86205100Above Target
EL and Former EL  67.9---- 84.0-31--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66, Target = 75.4CPI = 66, Target = 75.4CPI = 66, Target = 75.4 57.9 59.5 66.0 6.5 75.4 79.0 7522550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 81.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 81.5, Target = 87.2CPI = 81.5, Target = 87.2 78.1 66.7 81.5 14.8 87.2 89.1 804250Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.8, Target = 89.3CPI = 88.8, Target = 89.3 81.7 85.0 88.8 3.8 89.3 90.9 67120875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.8, Target = 91CPI = 85.8, Target = 91CPI = 85.8, Target = 91 84.5 84.0 85.8 1.8 91.0 92.3 6855250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.8, Target = 83.8CPI = 74.8, Target = 83.8CPI = 74.8, Target = 83.8 72.2 69.7 74.8 5.1 83.8 86.1 8115850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.3, Target = 78.6CPI = 77.3, Target = 78.6CPI = 77.3, Target = 78.6 76.6 76.6 77.3 0.7 78.6 88.3 808850Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.8, Target = 79.1CPI = 64.8, Target = 79.1CPI = 64.8, Target = 79.1 64.2 61.5 64.8 3.3 79.1 82.1 648650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 91.3CPI = 85.8, Target = 91.3CPI = 85.8, Target = 91.3 85.1 84.3 85.8 1.5 91.3 92.6 6452050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.2 18.412900 4.3 3.6129025
High needs 6.6 7.939425 11.2 10.43940
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.7 11.22050 8.3 3.920525
EL and Former EL--31---31-
Students w/ disabilities 1.7 3.122625 17.9 17.32260
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino 7.0 9.54225 11.6 4.84225
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--21---21-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.6 18.712080 4.2 3.5120825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.6 35.5129025 8.5 5.6129025
High needs 12.3 15.839325 21.0 14.539325
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.6 20.520525 14.6 9.320525
EL and Former EL--31---31-
Students w/ disabilities 6.1 7.622525 32.8 24.022525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino 14.3 28.64225 26.2 9.54225
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--21---21-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.0 35.8120825 7.5 5.3120825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.7 15.65520 6.8 4.255225
High needs 8.1 5.11580 18.6 12.015825
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.1 5.7880 12.8 11.48825
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 2.0 2.38625 26.0 18.68625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.9 16.35200 6.6 4.252025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 53.0 56.0 3.0 51.0Yes104875On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 49.0 53.0 4.0 51.0No30175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 49.0 57.5 8.5 51.0Yes16275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-21--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 45.5 47.0 1.5 51.0No16550Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 40.0 63.0 23.0 51.0Yes32100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 53.0 55.0 2.0 51.0No98575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 57.0 65.0 8.0 51.0Yes1041100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 51.0 61.0 10.0 51.0Yes298100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 52.0 60.0 8.0 51.0Yes161100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-21--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 54.0 56.5 2.5 51.0Yes16275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51 40.0 79.0 39.0 51.0Yes31100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 58.0 64.0 6.0 51.0Yes979100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 58.0 60.0200
High needs 58.0 60.0200
EL and Former EL 58.0 60.020-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 80 94.6 94.2 -0.4 80.0 90.017275On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 88.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.5, Target = 80 87.5 88.5 1.0 80.0 90.06175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilitiesCohort Graduation Rate = 76.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 76.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 76.9, Target = 80 76.9 76.9 0.0 80.0 90.02625No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.08--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.07--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80 94.2 93.5 -0.7 80.0 90.015375On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.6, Target = 85 95.8 94.6 -1.2 85.0 95.014975On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 87.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.5, Target = 85 88.3 87.5 -0.8 85.0 95.05675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.03--
Students w/ disabilitiesCohort Graduation Rate = 76.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 76.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 76.9, Target = 85 80.6 76.9 -3.7 85.0 95.0260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 85 95.4 94.2 -1.2 85.0 95.013775On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.8 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.77971075On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 1.7 2.9 0.9 1.2 -0.3 1.7 1.57116575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  0.0---- 0.0-83--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesDropout Rate = 2, Target = 2.2 3.7 0.0 2.0 -2.0 2.2 1.9569975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/LatinoDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.08326100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.5, Target = 0.9 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.9 0.86765275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students1301128699Yes1302129099Yes56556199Yes
High needs40039098Yes40139398Yes16516198Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20820398Yes20920598Yes929098Yes
EL and Former EL312787No3131100Yes14---
Students w/ disabilities23122698Yes23222597Yes918796Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---5---
Hispanic/Latino434093No434298Yes14---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.21---21---11---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White1218120799Yes1219120899Yes53152799Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles