Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Ashburnham-Westminster

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Ashburnham-Westminster

District Information

District:

Ashburnham-Westminster (06100000)

Region:

Central

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.1	89.3	90.6	1.3	94.2	95.1	57	1290	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		78.7	77.7	79.9	2.2	87.6	89.4	57	394	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.4	83.4	86.5	3.1	84.8	91.7	80	205	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		67.9	-	-	-	-	84.0	-	31	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		68.6	70.0	71.1	1.1	81.7	84.3	59	226	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		91.3	80.2	86.3	6.1	94.9	95.7	71	42	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.0	89.8	90.9	1.1	94.2	95.0	53	1208	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.4	84.3	88.3	4.0	89.2	90.7	67	1290	75	On Target
High needs		66.8	70.3	76.1	5.8	80.6	83.4	86	393	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.9	75.9	81.2	5.3	77.9	88.0	86	205	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		67.9	-	-	-	-	84.0	-	31	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		57.9	59.5	66.0	6.5	75.4	79.0	75	225	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		78.1	66.7	81.5	14.8	87.2	89.1	80	42	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.7	85.0	88.8	3.8	89.3	90.9	67	1208	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.5	84.0	85.8	1.8	91.0	92.3	68	552	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		72.2	69.7	74.8	5.1	83.8	86.1	81	158	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		76.6	76.6	77.3	0.7	78.6	88.3	80	88	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.2	61.5	64.8	3.3	79.1	82.1	64	86	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.1	84.3	85.8	1.5	91.3	92.6	64	520	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.2	18.4	1290	0	4.3	3.6	1290	25
High needs	6.6	7.9	394	25	11.2	10.4	394	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.7	11.2	205	0	8.3	3.9	205	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	31	-	-	-	31	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	3.1	226	25	17.9	17.3	226	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.0	9.5	42	25	11.6	4.8	42	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	17.6	18.7	1208	0	4.2	3.5	1208	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	27.6	35.5	1290	25	8.5	5.6	1290	25
High needs	12.3	15.8	393	25	21.0	14.5	393	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.6	20.5	205	25	14.6	9.3	205	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	31	-	-	-	31	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.1	7.6	225	25	32.8	24.0	225	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	14.3	28.6	42	25	26.2	9.5	42	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	28.0	35.8	1208	25	7.5	5.3	1208	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.7	15.6	552	0	6.8	4.2	552	25
High needs	8.1	5.1	158	0	18.6	12.0	158	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.1	5.7	88	0	12.8	11.4	88	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.0	2.3	86	25	26.0	18.6	86	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.9	16.3	520	0	6.6	4.2	520	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	56.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	1048	75	On Target
High needs		49.0	53.0	4.0	51.0	No	301	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		49.0	57.5	8.5	51.0	Yes	162	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.5	47.0	1.5	51.0	No	165	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.0	63.0	23.0	51.0	Yes	32	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		53.0	55.0	2.0	51.0	No	985	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.0	65.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	1041	100	Above Target
High needs		51.0	61.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	298	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.0	60.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	161	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.0	56.5	2.5	51.0	Yes	162	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.0	79.0	39.0	51.0	Yes	31	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		58.0	64.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	979	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	58.0	60.0	20.00	0
High needs	58.0	60.0	20.00	0
EL and Former EL	58.0	60.0	20.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.6	94.2	-0.4	80.0	90.0	172	75	On Target
High needs		87.5	88.5	1.0	80.0	90.0	61	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		76.9	76.9	0.0	80.0	90.0	26	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		94.2	93.5	-0.7	80.0	90.0	153	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.8	94.6	-1.2	85.0	95.0	149	75	On Target
High needs		88.3	87.5	-0.8	85.0	95.0	56	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		80.6	76.9	-3.7	85.0	95.0	26	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		95.4	94.2	-1.2	85.0	95.0	137	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		1.4	0.4	0.4	0.0	0.8	0.7	79	710	75	On Target
High needs		2.9	0.9	1.2	-0.3	1.7	1.5	71	165	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	83	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		3.7	0.0	2.0	-2.0	2.2	1.9	56	99	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	83	26	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		1.5	0.5	0.5	0.0	0.9	0.8	67	652	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	1301	1286	99	Yes	1302	1290	99	Yes	565	561	99	Yes
High needs	400	390	98	Yes	401	393	98	Yes	165	161	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	208	203	98	Yes	209	205	98	Yes	92	90	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	31	27	87	No	31	31	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	231	226	98	Yes	232	225	97	Yes	91	87	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	43	40	93	No	43	42	98	Yes	14	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	21	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	11	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1218	1207	99	Yes	1219	1208	99	Yes	531	527	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.