Massachusetts School and District Profiles

River Valley Charter (District)
District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - River Valley Charter (District)

District Information
District:River Valley Charter (District) (04820000)
Region:Northeast
Title I Status:No
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.8, Target = 95.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.8, Target = 95.1 75 or Higher All Students 91.6 93.3 91.8 -1.5 95.1 95.8 8219075On Target
High needsCPI = 78.2, Target = 91 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 78.2, Target = 91 75 or Higher High needs 84.6 84.6 78.2 -6.4 91.0 92.3 62390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.4, Target = 91 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 72.4, Target = 91 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 84.6 79.3 72.4 -6.9 91.0 92.3 78290Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.9, Target = 95.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.3 75 or Higher White 91.9 93.0 91.9 -1.1 95.3 96.0 6516975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.6, Target = 89.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77.6, Target = 89.7 75 or Higher All Students 82.4 82.5 77.6 -4.9 89.7 91.2 551890Declined
High needsCPI = 61.8, Target = 80.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 61.8, Target = 80.9 75 or Higher High needs 67.3 64.7 61.8 -2.9 80.9 83.7 28380Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56.3, Target = 80.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 56.3, Target = 80.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 67.3 56.9 56.3 -0.6 80.9 83.7 582825No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.2, Target = 89.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 77.2, Target = 89.8 75 or Higher White 82.5 82.9 77.2 -5.7 89.8 91.3 271680Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.7, Target = 88.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 87.7, Target = 88.575 or Higher All Students 80.2 88.8 87.7 -1.1 88.5 90.1 886375On Target
High needs -------10--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------2--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 88.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87.1, Target = 88.8 75 or Higher White 80.8 89.2 87.1 -2.1 88.8 90.4 745875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.9 15.81900 1.6 2.61900
High needs 7.7 7.7390 2.6 10.3390
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 0.0290 3.4 13.8290
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.8 17.21690 1.8 3.01690
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.0 23.81890 8.5 13.21890
High needs 10.3 13.23825 23.1 34.2380
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 10.72825 31.0 39.3280
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.5 24.41680 8.4 13.11680
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.7 17.5630 1.7 3.2630
High needs--10---10-
Econ. Disadvantaged--2---2-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.9 19.0580 1.9 3.4580
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 58.0 60.0 2.0 51.0No155100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 55.0 65.5 10.5 51.0No28100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher White 61.0 60.0 -1.0 51.0No137100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 62.0 54.0 -8.0 51.0No15475On Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 61.0 62.0 1.0 51.0No27100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher White 61.5 51.0 -10.5 51.0No13675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 80.0 90.0---
High needs --- 80.0 90.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
White --- 80.0 90.0---
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 85.0 95.0---
High needs --- 85.0 95.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
White --- 85.0 95.0---
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19119099Yes19118999Yes6363100Yes
High needs3939100Yes393897Yes10---
Econ. Disadvantaged13---13---2---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities2929100Yes292897Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White17016999Yes17016899Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles