Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pioneer Valley Performing Arts Charter Public (District)

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Pioneer Valley Performing Arts Charter Public (District)

District Information

District:

Pioneer Valley Performing Arts Charter Public (District) (04790000)

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		97.3	93.1	94.5	1.4	98.4	98.7	77	195	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		96.0	87.2	86.6	-0.6	97.7	98.0	67	69	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		93.6	93.6	90.4	-3.2	94.1	96.8	70	39	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		82.1	78.7	78.8	0.1	89.6	91.1	68	39	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		92.0	95.2	94.2	-1.0	94.0	96.0	86	30	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		97.9	94.5	95.5	1.0	98.8	99.0	70	134	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.0	79.2	81.4	2.2	86.6	88.5	55	196	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		65.9	71.9	69.6	-2.3	80.1	83.0	54	70	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.7	77.7	76.9	-0.8	79.6	88.9	67	40	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.1	62.5	59.4	-3.1	77.3	80.6	63	40	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.8	76.9	80.8	3.9	69.9	79.9	72	30	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.1	83.3	83.9	0.6	86.1	88.1	47	135	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.2	83.7	81.6	-2.1	90.8	92.1	62	122	25	No Change
High needs		68.5	76.6	70.5	-6.1	81.6	84.3	59	44	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.5	-	-	-	-	81.3	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.9	89.1	85.5	-3.6	90.0	91.5	63	86	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	33.0	39.0	195	25	5.0	2.6	195	25
High needs	22.2	23.2	69	0	9.7	7.2	69	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.5	30.8	39	25	4.3	5.1	39	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	14.7	12.8	39	0	17.6	12.8	39	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	19.2	36.7	30	25	3.8	3.3	30	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	40.1	43.3	134	0	3.6	2.2	134	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	30.3	32.1	196	0	14.4	12.2	196	25
High needs	17.8	17.1	70	0	20.5	21.4	70	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	23.4	22.5	40	0	14.9	15.0	40	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.6	7.5	40	25	27.8	32.5	40	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	19.2	26.7	30	25	15.4	10.0	30	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	36.2	37.8	135	0	10.1	11.1	135	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.4	20.5	122	0	9.5	12.3	122	0
High needs	10.4	11.4	44	0	16.7	27.3	44	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32.2	25.6	86	0	6.9	8.1	86	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	54.0	6.0	51.0	No	165	75	On Target
High needs		41.0	41.0	0.0	51.0	No	59	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	31.0	-16.0	51.0	No	33	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		43.0	29.0	-14.0	51.0	No	34	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		53.0	57.0	4.0	51.0	No	116	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	48.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	161	75	On Target
High needs		50.0	51.0	1.0	51.0	No	58	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.0	47.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	33	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.5	54.0	-0.5	51.0	No	33	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		54.0	51.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	114	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	-	-
High needs	-	60.0	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.4	86.7	4.3	80.0	90.0	60	75	On Target
High needs		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	22	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
White		83.0	89.4	6.4	80.0	90.0	47	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.0	85.3	-9.7	85.0	95.0	68	75	On Target
High needs		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	20	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		92.3	84.9	-7.4	85.0	95.0	53	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		5.1	1.5	2.2	-0.7	3.0	2.6	29	271	75	On Target
High needs		10.3	1.4	5.1	-3.7	6.0	5.2	20	78	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		2.8	-	-	-	-	1.4	-	36	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		7.1	2.8	5.7	-2.9	4.1	3.6	19	53	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		10.3	-	-	-	-	5.2	-	30	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		3.8	1.4	2.9	-1.5	2.2	1.9	15	205	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	197	195	99	Yes	197	196	99	Yes	130	128	98	Yes
High needs	70	69	99	Yes	70	70	100	Yes	46	46	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	40	39	98	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	24	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	40	39	98	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	27	27	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	30	30	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	136	134	99	Yes	136	135	99	Yes	91	89	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.