Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Edward M. Kennedy Academy for Health Careers (Horace Mann Charter) (District)

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Edward M. Kennedy Academy for Health Careers (Horace Mann Charter) (District)

District Information

District:

Edward M. Kennedy Academy for Health Careers (Horace Mann Charter) (District) (04520000)

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.7	98.1	97.4	-0.7	97.5	97.9	39	86	75	On Target
High needs		94.5	96.8	96.4	-0.4	96.8	97.3	64	63	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		98.3	98.3	96.9	-1.4	98.4	99.2	65	48	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		95.5	97.4	98.3	0.9	97.4	97.8	88	30	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		89.8	98.6	96.6	-2.0	94.1	94.9	83	44	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.1	86.4	83.7	-2.7	90.7	92.1	19	86	0	Declined
High needs		83.6	83.3	78.6	-4.7	90.4	91.8	32	63	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.9	83.9	82.8	-1.1	85.2	92.0	38	48	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		76.1	80.7	82.3	1.6	86.1	88.1	57	31	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		85.6	91.9	82.6	-9.3	91.6	92.8	67	43	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		69.5	74.4	69.2	-5.2	82.2	84.8	7	78	0	Declined
High needs		67.2	72.4	66.1	-6.3	80.9	83.6	7	56	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	69.6	-5.4	77.1	87.5	13	42	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		65.9	76.2	73.2	-3.0	80.1	83.0	35	28	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		69.8	71.4	65.0	-6.4	82.4	84.9	17	40	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	37.8	20.9	86	0	0.0	0.0	86	25
High needs	31.5	15.9	63	0	0.0	0.0	63	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	35.6	18.8	48	0	0.0	0.0	48	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	35.4	20.0	30	0	0.0	0.0	30	25
Hispanic/Latino	35.1	18.2	44	0	0.0	0.0	44	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.7	24.4	86	0	6.7	8.1	86	0
High needs	24.1	19.0	63	0	9.3	11.1	63	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	24.4	22.9	48	0	8.9	6.3	48	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20.8	12.9	31	0	10.4	9.7	31	0
Hispanic/Latino	27.0	30.2	43	25	2.7	9.3	43	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	1.3	78	25	0.0	3.8	78	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	56	0	0.0	5.4	56	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	42	0	0.0	7.1	42	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.0	3.6	28	25	0.0	0.0	28	25
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	40	0	0.0	7.5	40	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.0	55.0	-9.0	51.0	No	82	75	On Target
High needs		65.5	55.0	-10.5	51.0	No	60	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.0	52.0	-21.0	51.0	No	45	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		60.5	49.0	-11.5	51.0	Yes	27	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		65.5	64.5	-1.0	51.0	No	44	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		29.0	41.0	12.0	51.0	No	82	75	On Target
High needs		31.0	42.0	11.0	51.0	No	60	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		33.0	42.0	9.0	51.0	No	45	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		23.0	27.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	28	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		40.5	47.0	6.5	51.0	No	43	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	23.0	60.0	53.00	0
High needs	23.0	60.0	53.00	0
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	53.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		97.8	93.5	-4.3	80.0	90.0	92	75	On Target
High needs		97.6	93.2	-4.4	80.0	90.0	74	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		96.3	91.8	-4.5	80.0	90.0	49	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	30	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		100.0	100.0	0.0	85.0	95.0	46	100	Above Target
High needs		100.0	100.0	0.0	85.0	95.0	42	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		100.0	100.0	0.0	85.0	95.0	27	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.0	0.9	0.3	0.6	0.0	0.0	80	359	75	On Target
High needs		0.0	1.1	0.5	0.6	0.0	0.0	80	196	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	150	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	45	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	41	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		0.0	0.6	0.0	0.6	0.0	0.0	82	174	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		0.0	0.8	0.7	0.1	0.0	0.0	67	145	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	87	86	99	Yes	86	86	100	Yes	87	87	100	Yes
High needs	64	63	98	Yes	63	63	100	Yes	64	64	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	49	48	98	Yes	48	48	100	Yes	49	49	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	31	30	97	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	44	44	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes	44	44	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.