Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public (District)

District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public (District)


District Information
District:Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public (District) (04500000)
Region:Pioneer Valley
Title I Status:Yes
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.8, Target = 95 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.8, Target = 95 75 or Higher All Students 91.5 92.2 91.8 -0.4 95.0 95.8 8214475On Target
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 92.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82.9, Target = 92.5 75 or Higher High needs 87.2 82.9 82.9 0.0 92.5 93.6 773825No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79.2, Target = 89.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 79.2, Target = 89.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 81.3 78.6 79.2 0.6 89.1 90.7 873050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.3, Target = 96 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 92.3, Target = 96 75 or Higher White 93.1 93.5 92.3 -1.2 96.0 96.6 6912075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 91.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.7, Target = 91.4 75 or Higher All Students 85.3 85.6 86.7 1.1 91.4 92.7 7914350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.4, Target = 86.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 72.4, Target = 86.7 75 or Higher High needs 77.2 72.0 72.4 0.4 86.7 88.6 673850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.3, Target = 82.5 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 68.3, Target = 82.5 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 70.0 63.8 68.3 4.5 82.5 85.0 863050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87, Target = 92.1 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87, Target = 92.1 75 or Higher White 86.4 87.1 87.0 -0.1 92.1 93.2 6611975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.4, Target = 92.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 88.4, Target = 92.5 75 or Higher All Students 87.1 81.1 88.4 7.3 92.5 93.6 8943100Above Target
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------3--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.2, Target = 94.1 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88.2, Target = 94.1 75 or Higher White 89.8 81.4 88.2 6.8 94.1 94.9 773475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 20.2 20.11440 0.8 2.11440
High needs 4.9 7.93825 2.4 5.3380
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.33025 3.6 6.7300
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.4 20.81200 0.0 1.71200
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.3 30.81430 8.5 7.014325
High needs 9.5 7.9380 19.0 15.83825
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.33025 24.1 20.03025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.5 33.61190 6.0 6.71190
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.1 18.64325 5.4 0.04325
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--3---3-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.6 23.53425 5.7 0.03425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 63.0 59.0 -4.0 51.0No11175On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 49.0 51.0 2.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher White 64.0 59.0 -5.0 51.0No9575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 66.0 58.0 -8.0 51.0No10975On Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 59.0 58.0 -1.0 51.0No3375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher White 65.0 58.0 -7.0 51.0No9375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 80.0 90.0---
High needs --- 80.0 90.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
White --- 80.0 90.0---
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 85.0 95.0---
High needs --- 85.0 95.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
White --- 85.0 95.0---
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14914497Yes14914396Yes464395Yes
High needs423891No423892No16---
Econ. Disadvantaged12---12---3---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities343088No343089No14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino15---15---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12212098Yes12211998Yes363496Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles