Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Berkshire Arts and Technology Charter Public (District)

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Berkshire Arts and Technology Charter Public (District)

District Information

District:

Berkshire Arts and Technology Charter Public (District) (04140000)

Region:

Berkshires +

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.6	93.9	90.9	-3.0	95.7	96.3	47	235	0	Declined
High needs		90.9	92.5	86.0	-6.5	94.7	95.5	64	129	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		93.3	93.3	86.8	-6.5	93.9	96.7	52	100	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		89.0	88.9	78.4	-10.5	93.6	94.5	64	58	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		86.3	89.1	87.5	-1.6	89.7	93.2	62	36	25	No Change
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		93.2	95.6	92.3	-3.3	96.0	96.6	34	176	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.4	80.7	82.7	2.0	87.4	89.2	61	232	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.3	74.6	74.0	-0.6	85.0	87.2	73	127	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		73.8	73.8	76.3	2.5	76.0	86.9	63	99	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.9	70.4	62.5	-7.9	80.7	83.5	72	56	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		67.5	71.2	63.9	-7.3	75.6	83.8	31	36	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		80.1	83.0	86.1	3.1	88.4	90.1	61	174	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.2	78.2	81.6	3.4	86.1	88.1	62	99	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		67.7	75.0	73.0	-2.0	81.2	83.9	71	51	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		75.0	75.0	72.0	-3.0	77.1	87.5	58	41	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		76.1	-	-	-	-	88.1	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		77.9	82.3	86.0	3.7	87.1	89.0	68	73	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.8	25.5	235	25	0.0	4.3	235	0
High needs	13.4	17.1	129	25	0.0	7.0	129	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.9	19.0	100	25	0.0	7.0	100	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	9.3	5.2	58	0	0.0	10.3	58	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	17.9	2.8	36	0	0.0	2.8	36	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	20.0	27.3	176	25	0.0	3.4	176	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.7	38.4	232	25	10.4	13.4	232	0
High needs	16.4	22.8	127	25	15.7	21.3	127	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	20.8	26.3	99	25	14.9	18.2	99	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	7.4	12.5	56	25	24.1	30.4	56	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	17.9	11.1	36	0	17.9	30.6	36	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	28.3	43.7	174	25	8.2	10.3	174	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.9	20.2	99	25	10.3	9.1	99	25
High needs	3.7	17.6	51	25	9.3	17.6	51	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.0	17.1	41	25	10.0	19.5	41	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	8.1	20.5	73	25	6.5	4.1	73	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	56.0	-10.0	51.0	No	205	75	On Target
High needs		74.0	49.0	-25.0	51.0	No	111	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.0	55.0	-17.0	51.0	No	85	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.0	30.0	-32.0	51.0	No	50	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		74.0	61.0	-13.0	51.0	No	29	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		64.0	55.0	-9.0	51.0	No	157	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	59.5	-6.5	51.0	Yes	198	75	On Target
High needs		63.0	51.0	-12.0	51.0	Yes	106	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.0	55.0	-13.0	51.0	Yes	81	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.0	39.5	-22.5	51.0	No	46	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		66.0	42.0	-24.0	51.0	No	27	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		64.0	61.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	152	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	6.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	6.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	6.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	19	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	15	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	17	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.0	62.5	-21.5	85.0	95.0	24	0	Declined
High needs		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	19	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	22	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		2.4	3.3	0.0	3.3	1.4	1.2	95	129	100	Above Target
High needs		3.6	5.8	0.0	5.8	2.1	1.8	91	64	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	46	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	26	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		2.6	3.9	0.0	3.9	1.5	1.3	92	106	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	237	235	99	Yes	235	232	99	Yes	100	99	99	Yes
High needs	131	129	98	Yes	129	127	98	Yes	52	51	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	101	100	99	Yes	100	99	99	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	59	58	98	Yes	57	56	98	Yes	21	20	95	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	36	36	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	15	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	14	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	178	176	99	Yes	177	174	98	Yes	74	73	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.