Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Williamstown
District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Williamstown

District Information
District:Williamstown (03410000)
Region:Berkshires +
Title I Status:Yes
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.8, Target = 96.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 94.8, Target = 96.4 75 or Higher All Students 93.9 94.2 94.8 0.6 96.4 97.0 93237100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.4, Target = 88.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 85.4, Target = 88.6 75 or Higher High needs 80.4 85.8 85.4 -0.4 88.6 90.2 887225No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.8, Target = 90 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 86.8, Target = 90 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 89.1 89.1 86.8 -2.3 90.0 94.6 915375On Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.8, Target = 97 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 94.8, Target = 97 75 or Higher White 94.8 94.3 94.8 0.5 97.0 97.4 90192100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.7, Target = 93.6 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94.7, Target = 93.6CPI = 94.7, Target = 93.675 or Higher All Students 89.1 90.4 94.7 4.3 93.6 94.6 93237100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.8, Target = 82 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 86.8, Target = 82CPI = 86.8, Target = 8275 or Higher High needs 69.2 81.6 86.8 5.2 82.0 84.6 9172100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.1, Target = 84.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 90.1, Target = 84.1CPI = 90.1, Target = 84.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 82.6 82.6 90.1 7.5 84.1 91.3 9653100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94, Target = 93.6 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 94, Target = 93.675 or Higher White 89.0 90.6 94.0 3.4 93.6 94.5 8519275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 95.4 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90.5, Target = 95.4 75 or Higher All Students 92.1 89.4 90.5 1.1 95.4 96.1 855875On Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.6, Target = 96.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90.6, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher White 93.5 89.4 90.6 1.2 96.2 96.8 794875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.7 37.62370 2.8 1.323725
High needs 16.7 11.1720 6.9 4.27225
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.4 13.2530 2.2 3.8530
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--20---20-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.6 38.51920 3.0 1.019225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.5 57.823725 4.8 2.523725
High needs 15.3 30.67225 12.5 8.37225
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.2 35.85325 10.9 3.85325
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--20---20-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.5 58.919225 5.0 3.119225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.3 29.3580 3.7 0.05825
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.1 31.3480 4.4 0.04825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 58.0 58.5 0.5 51.0No17475On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 42.0 46.0 4.0 51.0No4950Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-39--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher White 59.0 57.0 -2.0 51.0No14575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 48.0 70.0 22.0 51.0Yes174100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 40.0 61.0 21.0 51.0Yes49100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-39--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 70, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 5175 or Higher White 48.0 70.0 22.0 51.0Yes144100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 80.0 90.0---
High needs --- 80.0 90.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
White --- 80.0 90.0---
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 85.0 95.0---
High needs --- 85.0 95.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
White --- 85.0 95.0---
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students24023799Yes24023799Yes605897Yes
High needs737299Yes737299Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged5353100Yes5353100Yes15---
EL and Former EL5---5---2---
Students w/ disabilities25---25---5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---3---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino12---12---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.21---21---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19419299Yes19419299Yes504896Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles