Massachusetts School and District Profiles

West Bridgewater

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - West Bridgewater

District Information

District:

West Bridgewater (03230000)

Region:

Southeast

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.6	91.1	91.7	0.6	95.7	96.3	65	672	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		82.6	78.4	81.5	3.1	89.9	91.3	71	185	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		84.0	84.0	86.9	2.9	85.3	92.0	81	120	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.9	66.1	68.8	2.7	84.2	86.5	50	73	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		92.8	91.4	92.6	1.2	95.8	96.4	68	601	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.1	84.7	83.8	-0.9	92.5	93.6	49	673	25	No Change
High needs		73.4	71.6	69.1	-2.5	84.5	86.7	46	185	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.0	78.0	75.6	-2.4	79.8	89.0	62	120	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		66.5	58.0	51.4	-6.6	80.5	83.3	21	73	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		87.3	85.8	84.9	-0.9	92.6	93.7	49	602	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.3	86.1	82.7	-3.4	91.4	92.7	53	288	0	Declined
High needs		75.3	74.7	72.6	-2.1	85.6	87.7	71	73	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.5	83.5	77.7	-5.8	84.9	91.8	82	47	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		67.9	55.6	61.7	6.1	81.3	84.0	53	30	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		85.5	86.8	84.0	-2.8	91.5	92.8	53	261	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.0	18.0	672	0	3.2	2.7	672	25
High needs	6.5	7.0	185	0	11.2	8.1	185	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.0	10.8	120	0	6.0	5.0	120	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	73	0	21.1	16.4	73	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	18.8	18.5	601	0	3.0	2.3	601	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	23.0	29.7	673	25	7.9	10.7	673	0
High needs	8.9	15.1	185	25	18.5	25.9	185	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.0	20.8	120	25	10.0	18.3	120	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.3	2.7	73	0	34.7	47.9	73	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	24.0	30.9	602	25	7.1	9.6	602	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.0	15.6	288	25	3.8	6.3	288	0
High needs	4.1	8.2	73	25	12.3	17.8	73	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.4	12.8	47	25	6.4	12.8	47	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	30	0	25.8	30.0	30	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	14.9	15.7	261	0	3.1	4.6	261	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	38.0	0.0	51.0	No	566	25	Below Target
High needs		30.0	34.5	4.5	51.0	Yes	150	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		34.0	34.5	0.5	51.0	Yes	100	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		19.0	32.5	13.5	51.0	Yes	58	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		37.0	38.0	1.0	51.0	No	507	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		27.0	29.0	2.0	51.0	No	563	50	Below Target
High needs		31.0	27.5	-3.5	51.0	No	150	0	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		27.5	29.5	2.0	51.0	No	100	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.5	25.0	-3.5	51.0	No	58	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		26.0	28.0	2.0	51.0	No	505	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	2.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	2.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	2.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.1	97.0	-1.1	80.0	90.0	101	100	Above Target
High needs		96.0	90.9	-5.1	80.0	90.0	33	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		97.9	96.8	-1.1	80.0	90.0	95	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.8	99.0	0.2	85.0	95.0	105	100	Above Target
High needs		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	25	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
White		98.7	98.9	0.2	85.0	95.0	95	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.3	0.2	0.0	0.2	0.2	0.2	97	417	100	Above Target
High needs		1.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.6	94	82	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	59	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	91	27	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		0.3	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.2	0.2	96	388	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	680	672	99	Yes	680	673	99	Yes	296	294	99	Yes
High needs	186	185	99	Yes	186	185	99	Yes	74	74	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	121	120	99	Yes	121	120	99	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	74	73	99	Yes	74	73	99	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	608	601	99	Yes	608	602	99	Yes	267	265	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.