Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Plainville
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Plainville

District Information
District:Plainville (02380000)
Region:Southeast
Title I Status:Yes
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.7, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.7, Target = 93.1 88.2 85.7 86.7 1.0 93.1 94.1 3141250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 70.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 70.4, Target = 85.4 75.0 68.8 70.4 1.6 85.4 87.5 813050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.9, Target = 75.4CPI = 78.9, Target = 75.4CPI = 78.9, Target = 75.4 73.2 73.2 78.9 5.7 75.4 86.6 2964100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------22--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.1, Target = 80.2CPI = 60.1, Target = 80.2CPI = 60.1, Target = 80.2 66.0 60.4 60.1 -0.3 80.2 83.0 187925No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------21--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 86.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 86.9, Target = 93.6 89.1 85.6 86.9 1.3 93.6 94.6 2534750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 90.3CPI = 83.8, Target = 90.3CPI = 83.8, Target = 90.3 83.3 82.7 83.8 1.1 90.3 91.7 4941050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.5, Target = 81.3CPI = 65.5, Target = 81.3CPI = 65.5, Target = 81.3 67.9 62.4 65.5 3.1 81.3 84.0 2412950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.6, Target = 69.8CPI = 72.6, Target = 69.8CPI = 72.6, Target = 69.8 67.1 67.1 72.6 5.5 69.8 83.6 4063100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------22--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.8, Target = 75.2CPI = 53.8, Target = 75.2CPI = 53.8, Target = 75.2 57.5 53.9 53.8 -0.1 75.2 78.8 317825No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------21--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.2, Target = 90.6CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.6CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.6 83.9 82.8 84.2 1.4 90.6 92.0 4434650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.6, Target = 92.4CPI = 79.6, Target = 92.4CPI = 79.6, Target = 92.4 87.0 84.0 79.6 -4.4 92.4 93.5 36970Declined
High needsCPI = 69.4, Target = 84.1CPI = 69.4, Target = 84.1CPI = 69.4, Target = 84.1 72.7 66.2 69.4 3.2 84.1 86.4 533150Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities  71.3---- 85.7-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.5, Target = 93.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 93.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 93.4 88.7 84.9 80.5 -4.4 93.4 94.4 31860Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.5 10.44120 5.5 6.34120
High needs 5.1 1.51300 15.4 18.51300
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.5 3.1640 14.0 10.96425
EL and Former EL--22---22-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0790 22.1 27.8790
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--21---21-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.9 9.83470 5.7 5.83470
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.2 31.541025 9.9 8.041025
High needs 6.0 14.712925 27.4 21.712925
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.3 19.06325 22.8 14.36325
EL and Former EL--22---22-
Students w/ disabilities 1.3 2.67825 33.8 29.57825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--21---21-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.5 31.234625 9.5 7.234625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.2 6.2970 9.3 5.29725
High needs 2.9 3.23125 20.6 9.73125
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.2 5.8860 9.1 4.78625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 56.0 60.0 4.0 51.0No283100Above Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 55.0 50.0 -5.0 51.0No7250Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 61.0 54.0 -7.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 50.0 51.0 1.0 51.0No4975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 56.0 60.0 4.0 51.0No247100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 64.0 61.0 -3.0 51.0No279100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 56.0 56.0 0.0 51.0Yes7075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 64.0 55.5 -8.5 51.0Yes3275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 43.0 57.0 14.0 51.0No4775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 64.0 60.0 -4.0 51.0No245100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 80.0 90.0---
High needs --- 80.0 90.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
White --- 80.0 90.0---
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 85.0 95.0---
High needs --- 85.0 95.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
White --- 85.0 95.0---
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students42341498Yes42341297Yes9898100Yes
High needs13413299Yes13413198Yes3232100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged666598Yes666497Yes13---
EL and Former EL24---24---6---
Students w/ disabilities828098Yes827996Yes2121100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2-------
Asian22---22---3---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---1---
Hispanic/Latino23---23---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White35734897Yes35734797Yes8686100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles