Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pembroke

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Pembroke

District Information

District:

Pembroke (02310000)

Region:

Southeast

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.0	92.3	92.1	-0.2	95.3	96.0	68	1684	25	No Change
High needs		81.2	81.7	81.2	-0.5	89.0	90.6	69	395	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.8	87.8	87.0	-0.8	88.8	93.9	83	215	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		74.1	71.6	72.7	1.1	84.9	87.1	64	226	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
White		92.1	92.4	92.2	-0.2	95.4	96.1	64	1625	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.9	86.1	89.0	2.9	92.9	94.0	73	1681	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		73.6	71.5	75.5	4.0	84.6	86.8	82	393	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.8	77.8	81.9	4.1	79.7	88.9	87	213	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.3	61.3	66.8	5.5	78.0	81.2	79	225	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
White		88.0	86.2	88.9	2.7	93.0	94.0	68	1623	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.5	82.9	84.1	1.2	92.1	93.3	59	757	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.1	70.1	71.2	1.1	84.9	87.1	62	164	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.8	74.8	80.7	5.9	76.9	87.4	87	96	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		63.8	60.1	58.7	-1.4	78.9	81.9	41	83	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White		86.9	83.5	84.0	0.5	92.4	93.5	53	732	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.5	23.6	1684	0	2.7	3.0	1684	0
High needs	8.8	9.6	395	0	8.8	9.4	395	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.9	16.3	215	25	5.1	6.0	215	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.9	1.8	226	0	15.4	14.6	226	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
White	22.6	23.6	1625	0	2.6	3.0	1625	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	31.3	39.6	1681	25	7.0	5.8	1681	25
High needs	11.8	16.8	393	25	18.6	15.5	393	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.7	25.4	213	25	13.4	10.3	213	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.0	4.9	225	0	28.0	23.1	225	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
White	31.2	39.3	1623	25	7.0	5.8	1623	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.2	16.9	757	25	6.5	4.8	757	25
High needs	4.8	8.5	164	25	16.8	11.0	164	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.4	11.5	96	25	11.2	5.2	96	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.8	4.8	83	25	27.5	20.5	83	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
White	15.1	16.8	732	25	5.7	4.6	732	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.0	43.0	-16.0	51.0	No	1391	50	Below Target
High needs		53.0	45.0	-8.0	51.0	No	295	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.5	43.5	-7.0	51.0	No	158	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		53.0	46.0	-7.0	51.0	No	165	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
White		59.0	43.0	-16.0	51.0	No	1348	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	49.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	1392	75	On Target
High needs		48.5	48.0	-0.5	51.0	Yes	296	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	49.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	157	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		56.0	46.0	-10.0	51.0	No	165	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
White		53.5	49.0	-4.5	51.0	Yes	1351	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	14.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	14.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	14.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.7	96.0	3.3	80.0	90.0	252	100	Above Target
High needs		83.3	94.1	10.8	80.0	90.0	85	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		82.2	90.3	8.1	80.0	90.0	31	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
White		92.3	95.9	3.6	80.0	90.0	245	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.9	93.1	-1.8	85.0	95.0	247	75	On Target
High needs		91.7	83.3	-8.4	85.0	95.0	84	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		94.3	82.2	-12.1	85.0	95.0	45	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
White		94.7	92.8	-1.9	85.0	95.0	235	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.5	1.0	1.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	53	1009	25	No Change
High needs		0.9	1.8	1.5	0.3	0.5	0.5	64	198	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		2.9	-	-	-	-	1.5	-	105	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.9	2.0	0.9	1.1	0.5	0.5	79	112	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
White		0.6	1.1	1.0	0.1	0.4	0.3	46	979	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	1724	1684	98	Yes	1721	1681	98	Yes	775	769	99	Yes
High needs	414	395	95	Yes	413	393	95	Yes	171	168	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	227	215	95	Yes	226	213	96	Yes	98	97	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	234	226	97	Yes	234	225	96	Yes	89	86	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	11	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
White	1663	1625	98	Yes	1660	1623	98	Yes	749	744	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.