Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gr New Bedford Vocational Technical
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2019
View Next Year
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Gr New Bedford Vocational Technical
Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical (08250000)		TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal		GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
71% - Substantial progress toward targets64.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%67%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		71%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage78%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%68%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		72%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage68% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
89

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 99.2 0.1 100.0 5214Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.0 96.8 -0.2 99.0 1321No Change
High needs 98.7 98.6 -0.1 100.0 2784Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.2 98.9 -0.3 100.0 2444Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 96.7 92.4 -4.3 99.1 330Declined
Students w/ disabilities 95.8 98.6 2.8 97.7 524Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 99.0 96.8 -2.2 100.0 391No Change
Hispanic/Latino 98.6 98.8 0.2 100.0 1414Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 254Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.2 99.6 0.4 100.0 3104Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.8 95.6 0.8 96.5 5213Met Target
Lowest Performing 80.2 83.0 2.8 82.9 1323Met Target
High needs 92.6 94.2 1.6 94.9 2783Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.0 95.1 1.1 96.8 2442Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 84.8 90.2 5.4 88.6 334Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 82.2 82.7 0.5 84.8 522Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 93.9 91.0 -2.9 97.3 390Declined
Hispanic/Latino 94.7 96.5 1.8 97.9 1413Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 88.8 94.0 5.2 90.6 254Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.2 95.8 0.6 96.9 3103Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.3 93.7 2.4 93.0 5103Met Target
Lowest Performing 73.1 79.9 6.8 76.6 1324Exceeded Target
High needs 88.0 91.1 3.1 90.6 2723Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.4 91.6 1.2 93.2 2392Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 32--
Students w/ disabilities 72.3 80.4 8.1 75.0 514Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 90.6 87.5 -3.1 92.3 380Declined
Hispanic/Latino 89.2 92.5 3.3 92.3 1343Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.1 95.0 2.9 94.0 3073Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 52.4 4643Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 35.8 1171Low Growth
High needs 50.6 2503Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.1 2193Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL 53.1 313Typical Growth - High
Students w/ disabilities 46.2 482Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 3--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 53.0 353Typical Growth - High
Hispanic/Latino 51.5 1283Typical Growth - High
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 53.3 2773Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 59.9 4643Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 50.1 1173Typical Growth - High
High needs 61.3 2504Exceeded Typical Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 60.6 2194Exceeded Typical Growth
EL and Former EL 66.8 314Exceeded Typical Growth
Students w/ disabilities 60.6 484Exceeded Typical Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 3--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 66.0 354Exceeded Typical Growth
Hispanic/Latino 64.5 1284Exceeded Typical Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 57.9 2773Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.8 90.9 1.1 91.6 5392Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.5 87.2 -0.3 90.9 2961No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.1 87.4 0.3 91.6 2692Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 76.1 82.5 6.4 81.8 574Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black 92.5 87.5 -5.0 100.0 480Declined
Hispanic/Latino 83.0 86.9 3.9 84.8 1224Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 85.0 95.2 10.2 86.8 214Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.0 92.7 0.7 93.8 3422Improved Below Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.3 91.3 -3.0 96.0 5390Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.5 89.4 -4.1 97.4 3680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.1 88.9 -4.2 97.4 3410Declined
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 91.5 80.3 -11.2 96.6 710Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 93.2 92.5 -0.7 97.7 530Declined
Hispanic/Latino 93.4 86.6 -6.8 95.1 1120Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.8 93.1 -1.7 96.6 3500Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.9 1.4 -0.5 1.7 2,1534Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.5 1.8 -0.7 2.3 1,0364Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.5 2.0 -0.5 2.3 8704Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 3.3 3.0 -0.3 3.0 673Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 2.9 0.0 2.6 2401No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 11--
Asian---- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black 1.6 1.1 -0.5 1.4 1744Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 3.5 1.9 -1.6 3.2 4654Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2.6 1.2 -1.4 2.3 834Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.5 1.4 -0.1 1.4 1,4023Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 34.4 33.3 -1.1 39.9 691No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 34.4 33.3 -1.1 39.9 691No Change
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.9 7.2 1.3 4.6 2,1453Met Target
Lowest Performing 11.9 5.3 -6.6 7.1 1324Exceeded Target
High needs 7.8 10.6 2.8 5.5 1,0690Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.6 11.5 1.9 5.0 8290Declined
EL and Former EL 6.8 10.5 3.7 3.0 1710Declined
Students w/ disabilities 7.8 11.2 3.4 4.2 1780Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 9--
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black 5.1 6.2 1.1 2.1 1783Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 6.9 8.4 1.5 3.1 4883Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9.6 9.7 0.1 8.3 931No Change
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 5.5 6.8 1.3 4.1 1,3563Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.2 49.6 -30.6 84.6 1,0400Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 73.7 44.9 -28.8 80.8 5080Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.6 44.0 -33.6 85.3 4300Declined
EL and Former EL 58.6 60.4 1.8 63.0 532Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 51.9 41.0 -10.9 59.3 1170Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black 80.5 44.2 -36.3 86.1 860Declined
Hispanic/Latino 79.6 53.3 -26.3 86.1 1950Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 83.8 45.9 -37.9 88.2 370Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.0 49.1 -30.9 85.0 7090Declined


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles