Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Algonquin Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Algonquin Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Northboro-Southboro (07300000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
66% - Substantial progress toward targets86

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage46%79%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
66%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage79%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage46%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage33%80%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
61%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage80% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage33%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
76

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.6 99.4 0.8 99.9 3864Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.3 98.9 1.6 98.9 924Exceeded Target
High needs 93.8 97.1 3.3 95.7 864Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.7 98.4 2.7 97.4 324Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities 91.5 97.6 6.1 93.6 524Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 98.6 100.0 1.4 100.0 454Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 95.5 94.0 -1.5 99.8 211No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.0 99.6 0.6 100.0 3004Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.5 97.3 1.8 97.1 3853Met Target
Lowest Performing 86.6 92.7 6.1 88.7 924Exceeded Target
High needs 80.1 89.0 8.9 82.1 864Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.0 90.6 2.6 90.3 323Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities 71.4 84.6 13.2 74.0 524Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 97.2 100.0 2.8 98.7 454Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 85.2 92.9 7.7 88.5 214Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.3 97.2 0.9 97.9 2993Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.7 97.3 0.6 98.4 3703Met Target
Lowest Performing 88.4 89.9 1.5 90.7 923Met Target
High needs 85.4 89.3 3.9 88.0 774Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.9 95.2 4.3 92.9 264Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 23--
Students w/ disabilities 80.0 86.5 6.5 82.5 484Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 99.3 97.7 -1.6 100.0 434Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.1 97.9 0.8 98.8 2884Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 62.6 3534Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing 40.9 802Typical Growth - Low
High needs 54.8 723Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 63.6 274Exceeded Typical Growth
EL and Former EL- 19--
Students w/ disabilities 47.7 482Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 2--
Asian 76.6 414Exceeded Typical Growth
Afr. Amer./Black- 5--
Hispanic/Latino- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 62.3 2774Exceeded Typical Growth

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 53.9 3513Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 49.1 792Typical Growth - Low
High needs 56.5 713Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.4 263Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 58.8 473Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 2--
Asian 61.9 414Exceeded Typical Growth
Afr. Amer./Black- 5--
Hispanic/Latino- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 52.9 2753Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 95.3 -2.8 99.2 3623Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.6 84.8 -9.8 97.8 920Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.9 83.0 -10.9 97.5 470Declined
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities 88.2 77.8 -10.4 92.1 540Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 94.6 -5.4 100.0 370Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 98.0 95.2 -2.8 99.4 2933Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.3 98.6 1.3 98.3 3603Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 91.4 95.9 4.5 94.0 744Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.2 95.9 5.7 93.8 494Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 91.8 91.2 -0.6 95.3 340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 344Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 97.5 98.7 1.2 98.7 2973Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 1,4633Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.8 1.0 0.2 1.0 3023Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.3 3.0 1.7 1.2 1010Declined
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities 0.6 1.5 0.9 1.0 1970Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1574Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 2.4 2.4 1.0 830Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 42--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.0 1,1563Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.3 13.1 1.8 10.2 1,4480Declined
Lowest Performing 12.6 9.8 -2.8 8.6 922Improved Below Target
High needs 23.3 25.3 2.0 20.2 3120Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.2 27.3 0.1 23.0 881No Change
EL and Former EL---- 85--
Students w/ disabilities 27.3 26.1 -1.2 23.4 1882Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian 6.3 7.5 1.2 4.4 1593Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 20--
Hispanic/Latino 19.3 22.7 3.4 15.3 750Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 49--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 11.1 13.2 2.1 9.7 1,1350Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.2 65.0 -1.2 68.9 7090Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 28.6 28.2 -0.4 35.2 1491No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.8 41.1 8.3 40.5 563Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 36--
Students w/ disabilities 13.6 14.6 1.0 20.8 892Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 85.1 81.4 -3.7 88.3 703Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 43.2 41.0 -2.2 49.5 390Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 23--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 65.1 64.2 -0.9 67.9 5641No Change


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles