Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Concord-Carlisle

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Concord-Carlisle

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Concord-Carlisle (06400000)

TITLE I STATUS
Title I District

REGION
Coastal

GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classification

Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification

Meeting or exceeding targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
83% - Meeting or exceeding targets	-

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	71%	91%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	83%
	Meeting or exceeding targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	12	12	47.5	12	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5	5	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	9	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	3	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		9.4	10.7	-	9.6	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		88%		-	93%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		91%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	47.5	7	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5	5	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	6	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		9.0	10.7	-	5.9	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		84%		-	57%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		71%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	56%	72%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	66%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	2	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	5	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	1	4	-
	Additional indicators total	1	8	10.0
Weighted total		7.7	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		72%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		72%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-
	Achievement total	7	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	4	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	1	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	4	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	1	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	2	4	-
	Additional indicators total	3	8	10.0
Weighted total		6.0	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		56%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		56%

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.8	99.6	-0.2	100.0	309	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	100.0	98.6	-1.4	100.0	71	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	99.1	98.1	-1.0	100.0	66	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	99.0	97.5	-1.5	100.0	50	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	100.0	98.1	-1.9	100.0	26	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.8	99.8	0.0	100.0	246	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	96.7	98.5	1.8	98.3	309	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	91.2	94.8	3.6	93.3	72	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	89.4	93.2	3.8	91.4	66	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	88.0	91.0	3.0	90.6	50	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	100.0	98.1	-1.9	100.0	26	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.7	98.9	1.2	99.3	246	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.0	99.1	1.1	99.7	294	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	94.5	97.5	3.0	96.8	71	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	93.0	96.0	3.0	95.6	63	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	91.8	94.8	3.0	94.3	48	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	23	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.7	99.5	0.8	100.0	236	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	55.8	269	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	42.2	62	2	Typical Growth - Low
High needs	49.6	53	2	Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	50.0	39	3	Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	53.7	22	3	Typical Growth - High
Afr. Amer./Black	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	56.2	214	3	Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	62.6	268	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing	58.3	63	3	Typical Growth - High
High needs	63.0	53	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	60.7	39	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	65.2	22	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
Afr. Amer./Black	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	62.3	213	4	Exceeded Typical Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	96.6	97.6	1.0	97.7	328	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	90.1	91.5	1.4	93.3	82	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	31	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	87.5	90.2	2.7	91.4	61	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	90.6	93.1	2.5	93.1	29	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	96.9	98.1	1.2	98.3	258	3	Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.4	99.1	-0.3	100.0	322	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	97.2	96.7	-0.5	99.8	91	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	96.6	95.8	-0.8	100.0	72	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	100.0	93.8	-6.2	100.0	32	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.6	99.6	0.0	100.0	262	4	Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.6	0.6	0.0	1.0	1,273	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	1.1	1.9	0.8	1.0	265	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	76	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.4	1.9	0.5	1.3	210	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	0.0	2.7	2.7	1.0	113	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	52	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	57	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	49	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.8	0.3	-0.5	1.0	1,002	4	Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	9.2	11.3	2.1	8.1	1,321	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	16.4	9.7	-6.7	12.4	72	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	17.7	18.5	0.8	14.6	308	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	73	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	29	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	19.1	21.0	1.9	15.2	238	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	6.0	7.2	1.2	4.1	111	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	54	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	61	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	66	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.7	11.2	1.5	8.3	1,028	0	Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	82.7	84.3	1.6	85.4	643	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	58.9	58.8	-0.1	65.5	148	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	39	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	51.9	54.6	2.7	59.1	119	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	92.1	93.3	1.2	95.3	60	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	31	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	83.6	84.8	1.2	86.4	499	3	Met Target

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	310	310	100	Yes	1	310	309	100	Yes	1	313	311	99	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	67	67	67	66	70	68	204	201	99	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	19	19	19	19	19	19	57	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	6	6	6	5	6	5	18	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	50	50	50	50	53	52	153	152	99	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	26	26	26	26	26	25	78	77	99	Yes	1
Afr. Amer./Black	14	14	14	14	14	14	42	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	13	13	13	12	14	13	40	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	11	11	11	11	11	11	33	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	246	246	246	246	248	248	740	740	100	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms