Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Amherst Regional High

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Amherst Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Amherst-Pelham (06050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Moderate progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
43% - Moderate progress toward targets52.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage75%21%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
43%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage21%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage75%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage35%28%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
31%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage28% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage35%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
50

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 97.2 -0.9 99.5 2241No Change
Lowest Performing 97.1 95.6 -1.5 99.1 511No Change
High needs 93.7 93.2 -0.5 95.6 881No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.6 94.0 1.4 94.8 583Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 91.9 94.6 2.7 93.8 463Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 98.0 -2.0 100.0 254Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino 90.4 92.9 2.5 92.3 393Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.4 99.3 -0.1 100.0 1154Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.0 89.5 -4.5 95.7 2220Declined
Lowest Performing 81.3 63.0 -18.3 84.0 500Declined
High needs 81.9 75.9 -6.0 84.2 870Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 82.8 78.4 -4.4 85.6 580Declined
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities 73.4 65.0 -8.4 76.0 450Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 97.6 92.0 -5.6 99.6 250Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino 77.3 80.1 2.8 80.5 393Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 96.5 -1.2 99.4 1141No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.7 91.7 -4.0 97.4 2100Declined
Lowest Performing 86.8 71.6 -15.2 90.3 510Declined
High needs 87.7 79.4 -8.3 90.3 790Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.2 81.3 -5.9 90.0 520Declined
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 82.3 72.7 -9.6 85.0 440Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 18--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino 83.6 86.5 2.9 86.7 373Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 97.6 -1.0 100.0 1134Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 54.9 1783Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 42.5 442Typical Growth - Low
High needs 56.5 633Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.5 423Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 56.3 373Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 54.1 283Typical Growth - High
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 55.8 1023Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 59.2 1733Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 38.2 411Low Growth
High needs 50.3 603Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.2 392Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 47.5 352Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 56.8 273Typical Growth - High
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 62.0 1004Exceeded Typical Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.2 90.6 -2.6 95.0 2330Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.7 79.1 -6.6 89.1 910Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 86.1 84.4 -1.7 90.6 640Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities 82.9 74.4 -8.5 88.6 390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 96.0 -4.0 100.0 253Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino 84.6 71.9 -12.7 86.4 320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.5 93.3 -1.2 96.3 1350Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 95.7 0.5 96.9 2353Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 91.5 91.8 0.3 95.4 982Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.9 92.4 0.5 96.2 792Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 87.0 95.1 8.1 92.1 414Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 17--
Hispanic/Latino 88.5 88.5 0.0 90.2 261No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.5 95.9 1.4 96.3 1453Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.1 1.0 -0.1 1.0 9233Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 3.2 2.2 -1.0 2.9 3214Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 1.9 -0.1 1.8 2092Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 43--
Students w/ disabilities 5.1 2.5 -2.6 4.6 1614Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 1.1 1.2 0.1 1.0 850Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 65--
Hispanic/Latino 4.6 1.3 -3.3 4.1 1534Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 88--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 0.5 0.4 -0.1 1.0 5294Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 40.0 28.1 -11.9 41.5 320Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 32--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 17.7 18.2 0.5 16.4 9411No Change
Lowest Performing 25.0 31.4 6.4 20.2 510Declined
High needs 28.4 33.4 5.0 26.1 3740Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.6 36.7 4.1 28.0 2100Declined
EL and Former EL---- 93--
Students w/ disabilities 29.0 41.7 12.7 25.4 1920Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 6.7 7.9 1.2 3.6 893Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 68--
Hispanic/Latino 26.2 34.2 8.0 22.4 1580Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 84--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 15.0 13.7 -1.3 13.6 5403Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.7 77.3 -1.4 83.1 4540Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 52.3 50.6 -1.7 59.4 1680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.0 55.0 -1.0 63.7 1091No Change
EL and Former EL---- 40--
Students w/ disabilities 36.1 31.8 -4.3 43.5 880Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 89.1 88.6 -0.5 94.3 444Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 32--
Hispanic/Latino 51.4 50.6 -0.8 57.9 771No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 38--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.8 85.1 -3.7 93.8 2623Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles