Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Reading Memorial High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Reading Memorial High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Reading (02460000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
62% - Substantial progress toward targets62.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage31%83%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
62%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage31%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage25%51%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
40%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage51% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage25%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
48

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.3 98.9 0.6 99.7 3214Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 93.6 96.9 3.3 95.6 814Exceeded Target
High needs 93.8 95.5 1.7 95.7 783Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.3 91.7 -4.6 98.5 330Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 92.2 94.1 1.9 94.1 593Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 99.5 1.4 99.6 2834Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.6 95.2 0.6 96.3 3203Met Target
Lowest Performing 79.5 83.6 4.1 82.2 814Exceeded Target
High needs 80.8 80.5 -0.3 83.1 771No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.2 78.9 -6.3 88.0 320Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 75.4 75.8 0.4 78.0 592Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.2 96.6 2.4 95.9 2833Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.0 94.4 1.4 94.7 3153Met Target
Lowest Performing 76.4 81.5 5.1 79.9 814Exceeded Target
High needs 81.3 84.0 2.7 83.9 753Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.5 82.3 -6.2 91.3 310Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 77.4 79.9 2.5 80.1 563Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.0 95.4 2.4 94.9 2823Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 46.6 3092Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 29.9 810Very Low Growth
High needs 39.0 741Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.9 311Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 35.9 571Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black- 8--
Hispanic/Latino- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 46.6 2762Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 50.1 3083Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 46.2 812Typical Growth - Low
High needs 47.4 732Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.7 302Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 44.6 572Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black- 7--
Hispanic/Latino- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 50.8 2763Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.7 98.5 0.8 99.5 2684Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.9 94.8 0.9 97.3 772Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 93.0 93.9 0.9 98.7 662Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 98.8 0.7 99.9 2444Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.7 98.3 -0.4 100.0 3493Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 97.1 94.9 -2.2 100.0 990Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.9 92.9 -2.0 99.2 420Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 97.5 94.4 -3.1 100.0 710Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 98.8 -0.1 100.0 3213Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 1,2353Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.7 0.7 0.0 1.0 2773Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 940Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 0.9 1.0 0.1 1.0 2093Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 58--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 32--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.1 -0.1 1.0 1,1084Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.9 7.6 1.7 4.6 1,2643Met Target
Lowest Performing 12.2 8.6 -3.6 7.4 813Met Target
High needs 15.9 17.2 1.3 13.6 3140Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.8 16.7 -2.1 14.2 902Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 16.2 18.7 2.5 12.6 2300Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 67--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 34--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.6 7.4 1.8 4.2 1,1213Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.7 67.1 5.4 66.1 6273Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 27.4 39.0 11.6 34.5 1594Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.0 49.1 24.1 32.7 554Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 25.2 32.2 7.0 32.6 1183Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 35--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 62.7 67.9 5.2 67.7 5573Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles