Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mashpee High

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Mashpee High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Mashpee (01720000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Moderate progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
40% - Moderate progress toward targets37.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage25%50%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
40%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage50%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage25%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage21%51%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
39%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage51% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage21%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
49

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 97.8 -0.3 99.6 1164Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.6 91.3 -1.3 95.4 261No Change
High needs 94.1 94.4 0.3 96.2 452Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.4 94.7 0.3 96.5 332Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 98.1 -0.5 100.0 934Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.9 94.7 0.8 95.7 1183Met Target
Lowest Performing 77.8 80.6 2.8 81.9 272Improved Below Target
High needs 85.3 87.8 2.5 87.9 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 86.1 86.4 0.3 88.7 352Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 7--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.4 98.4 3.0 97.4 944Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.3 92.3 0.0 94.2 1111No Change
Lowest Performing 75.0 73.1 -1.9 78.2 261No Change
High needs 83.9 81.8 -2.1 86.3 441No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.5 80.3 -8.2 90.8 330Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 6--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.3 95.5 2.2 95.1 893Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 46.2 1142Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 32.9 261Low Growth
High needs 44.7 442Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.4 332Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 2--
Students w/ disabilities- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 6--
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 6--
Hispanic/Latino- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 45.7 922Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 45.8 1152Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 40.4 272Typical Growth - Low
High needs 42.5 462Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.9 352Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 2--
Students w/ disabilities- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 7--
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 6--
Hispanic/Latino- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 47.1 922Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.0 94.0 5.0 91.1 1004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 81.7 87.5 5.8 85.6 404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 81.6 85.7 4.1 85.7 353Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.0 93.7 3.7 92.5 794Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.1 92.7 -1.4 96.0 1090Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.3 86.7 -5.6 95.6 600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.2 85.7 -4.5 93.1 490Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 7--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.9 94.4 -0.5 96.7 901No Change

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.7 0.9 -0.8 1.5 4514Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.6 2.5 -0.1 2.3 1631No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 2.5 0.5 1.8 1220Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 68--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 25--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 25--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.2 0.9 -0.3 1.1 3494Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 24.9 13.4 -11.5 22.6 4614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 18.5 7.4 -11.1 12.7 274Exceeded Target
High needs 38.2 22.3 -15.9 34.4 1754Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.1 25.0 -18.1 38.0 1164Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities---- 63--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 27--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 25--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 22.0 11.8 -10.2 19.5 3464Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.8 68.9 -1.9 77.3 2220Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.3 57.0 5.7 58.7 792Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 58.7 60.0 1.3 66.5 602Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 13--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 72.6 71.5 -1.1 79.1 1650Declined


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles