Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hopedale

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Hopedale

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Hopedale (01380000)

TITLE I STATUS
Title I District

REGION
West/Central

GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classification

Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification

Substantial progress toward targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
61% - Substantial progress toward targets	-

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	64%	60%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	61%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-	1	4	-	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	-	-	-	1	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	6	12	67.5	4	8	67.5	9	12	47.5	7	8	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	2	4	-	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5	5	8	22.5	6	8	22.5	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	1	4	-	0	4	-	3	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	4	10.0	1	4	10.0	4	8	10.0	3	4	10.0
Weighted total		5.6	10.3	-	3.9	7.6	-	8.0	10.7	-	5.5	7.6	-
Percentage of possible points		54%		-	51%		-	75%		-	72%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		53% Weight of non-high school results:67%						74% Weight of high school results:33%
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		60%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	0	4	-	2	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	3	12	67.5	6	8	67.5	12	12	47.5	8	8	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	2	4	-	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5	5	8	22.5	8	8	22.5	7	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	3	4	10.0	4	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		3.2	10.3	-	5.5	7.6	-	9.9	10.7	-	7.0	7.6	-
Percentage of possible points		31%		-	72%		-	93%		-	92%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		52% Weight of non-high school results:70%						93% Weight of high school results:30%
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		64%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	62%	-
Weight	-	-
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	-
	-

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics achievement	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Science achievement	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Growth	English language arts growth	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Growth total	-	-	-	-	-	-
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Weighted total		-	-	-	-	-	-
Percentage of possible points		-		-	-		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		-			-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		-

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	2	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	6	12	67.5	12	12	70.0
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5	-	-	-
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	8	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		5.2	10.3	-	10.4	11.6	-
Percentage of possible points		50%		-	90%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		50% Weight of non-high school results:70%			90% Weight of high school results:30%
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		62%

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	507.6	508.6	1.0	508.8	480	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	488.1	491.7	3.6	491.8	97	3	Met Target
High needs	-	-	-	-	155	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	70	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	116	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	507.7	509.3	1.6	509.0	406	3	Met Target

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.6	99.7	0.1	100.0	76	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	98.8	100.0	1.2	100.0	20	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.6	99.6	0.0	100.0	70	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	506.5	505.6	-0.9	507.8	481	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	487.1	487.0	-0.1	489.8	98	1	No Change
High needs	-	-	-	-	156	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	71	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	117	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	506.8	506.7	-0.1	507.9	407	1	No Change

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.9	98.0	-0.9	100.0	76	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	97.5	95.0	-2.5	100.0	20	3	Met Target
High needs	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.8	97.9	-0.9	100.0	70	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	81.0	82.7	1.7	82.8	166	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	51	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	28	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	81.7	83.1	1.4	83.6	136	3	Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	96.4	95.3	-1.1	98.2	74	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	96.5	94.9	-1.6	98.4	68	1	No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	53.0	383	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	51.5	96	3	Typical Growth - High
High needs	-	111	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	51	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	77	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	2	-	-
White	53.4	334	3	Typical Growth - High

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	61.5	72	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing	38.6	20	1	Low Growth
High needs	-	14	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	6	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	61.8	66	4	Exceeded Typical Growth

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	48.5	386	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	46.4	98	2	Typical Growth - Low
High needs	-	113	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	53	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	78	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	2	-	-
White	48.6	336	2	Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	44.1	72	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	37.4	20	1	Low Growth
High needs	-	14	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	6	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	43.3	66	2	Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.8	97.8	0.0	99.6	90	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.8	97.7	-1.1	100.0	87	4	Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.6	97.8	0.2	99.2	89	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.5	98.8	1.3	99.1	80	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.3	0.6	0.3	1.0	319	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	77	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	51	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.3	0.7	0.4	1.0	295	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	6.0	4.3	-1.7	5.0	645	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	7.1	7.1	0.0	5.0	98	1	No Change
High needs	-	-	-	-	216	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	83	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	28	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	159	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	45	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	28	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White	6.1	4.0	-2.1	4.9	548	4	Exceeded Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	10.1	11.6	1.5	8.5	318	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	15.0	10.0	-5.0	9.7	20	3	Met Target
High needs	-	-	-	-	82	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	51	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.3	11.9	1.6	8.5	286	0	Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	66.5	77.0	10.5	70.8	148	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	44	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	68.1	78.9	10.8	72.3	133	4	Exceeded Target

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	566	556	98	Yes	1	566	559	99	Yes	1	246	242	98	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	180	173	180	176	72	69	432	418	97	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	83	77	83	80	38	36	204	193	95	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	24	22	24	24	12	12	60	58	97	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	130	128	130	129	46	44	306	301	98	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	2	2	2	1	1	5	-	-	-	-
Asian	13	13	13	13	11	11	37	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	9	10	9	3	2	23	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	34	34	34	34	13	13	81	81	100	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	21	21	21	21	7	7	49	49	100	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	1	2	2	2	2	6	-	-	-	-
White	484	476	484	478	209	206	1,177	1,160	99	Yes	1

School Accountability Information
About the Data
School	Accountability classification
Hopedale Jr Sr High	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Memorial	Requiring assistance or intervention
Park Street School	Insufficient data

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms