Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Douglas High School

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Douglas High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Douglas (00770000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
52% - Substantial progress toward targets42.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage55%51%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
52%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage55%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage47%47%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
47%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage47% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage47%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
19

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.5 98.4 0.9 99.0 914Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.0 97.5 1.5 98.8 204Exceeded Target
High needs 92.0 93.2 1.2 94.1 223Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 98.1 98.5 0.4 99.7 834Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.7 89.0 -3.7 94.5 910Declined
Lowest Performing 78.0 69.0 -9.0 82.1 210Declined
High needs 86.1 60.7 -25.4 88.7 210Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 93.1 89.8 -3.3 95.1 830Declined

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.6 92.5 1.9 92.5 833Met Target
Lowest Performing 76.0 75.0 -1.0 79.2 201No Change
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 91.1 92.5 1.4 92.9 773Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 63.7 864Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing- 18--
High needs 50.6 213Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged- 14--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.- 1--
White 64.8 784Exceeded Typical Growth

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 46.8 872Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing- 19--
High needs 29.5 210Very Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged- 14--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.- 1--
White 48.0 792Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 90.5 93.5 3.0 92.6 924Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 76.9 85.7 8.8 80.8 424Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.8 94.4 3.6 93.3 904Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.9 92.4 -1.5 95.8 1050Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.5 82.1 -5.4 90.8 390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.6 91.8 -2.8 96.4 980Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.3 0.3 -2.0 2.1 3824Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 5.8 1.0 -4.8 5.2 1014Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 51--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 66--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 2.4 0.3 -2.1 2.2 3604Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.0 16.1 3.1 10.7 4030Declined
Lowest Performing 4.0 38.1 34.1 0.0 210Declined
High needs 26.1 28.1 2.0 22.3 1210Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 64--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 72--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 12.5 15.5 3.0 10.0 3680Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.4 51.0 3.6 53.9 2062Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 13.2 24.6 11.4 20.6 654Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 36--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 37--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 47.9 51.3 3.4 54.4 1912Improved Below Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles