Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lexington

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lexington

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Lexington (01550000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I District
REGION Coastal	GRADES SERVED PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
Meeting targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
95% - Meeting targets	-

This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	12	12	60.0	8	8	67.5	12	12	40.0	8	8	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	4	4	-	3	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	20.0	6	8	22.5	7	8	20.0	5	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	3	4	10.0	-	-	-	3	4	10.0	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	4	10.0	4	4	10.0	7	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		9.3	9.6	-	7.2	7.6	-	9.4	10.0	-	6.9	7.6	-
Percentage of possible points		97%		-	95%		-	94%		-	91%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		96% Weight of non-high school results:70%						93% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		95%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Achievement total	10	12	67.5	9	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	6	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	10	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	4	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		8.1	10.3	-	8.0	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		79%		-	75%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		79% Weight of non-high school results:70%			75% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		78%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	515.3	518.4	3.1	517.1	3,527	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	493.6	499.7	6.1	498.0	659	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	500.3	503.8	3.5	501.8	1,072	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	501.2	502.6	1.4	502.8	226	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	507.3	507.9	0.6	509.1	520	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	495.1	495.6	0.5	496.5	516	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	519.6	523.2	3.6	521.4	1,378	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	151	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	117	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	516.3	519.7	3.4	518.1	231	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	514.0	516.8	2.8	516.0	1,647	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.1	99.2	0.1	100.0	587	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	98.6	100.0	1.4	100.0	136	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	95.0	96.9	1.9	96.9	146	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.1	98.9	2.8	97.9	47	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	100.0	97.8	-2.2	100.0	46	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	92.4	95.1	2.7	94.7	71	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	99.9	99.6	-0.3	100.0	240	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	95.7	100.0	4.3	97.2	33	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.8	98.9	0.1	100.0	270	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	519.0	518.3	-0.7	520.7	3,529	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	492.5	496.7	4.2	495.1	657	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	504.2	505.7	1.5	505.7	1,073	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	502.8	499.3	-3.5	503.9	226	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	515.2	513.8	-1.4	517.0	521	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	496.5	494.8	-1.7	498.0	516	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	527.8	527.5	-0.3	530.2	1,380	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	150	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	118	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	519.6	517.7	-1.9	521.3	232	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	515.2	514.2	-1.0	516.9	1,646	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.6	98.7	0.1	100.0	586	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	97.4	98.0	0.6	100.0	136	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	93.4	94.7	1.3	95.9	146	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	93.2	92.6	-0.6	95.9	47	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	97.7	100.0	2.3	100.0	45	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	90.9	89.9	-1.0	93.8	72	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	100.0	99.9	-0.1	100.0	236	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	95.7	97.7	2.0	97.5	33	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.5	98.0	-0.5	100.0	273	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	90.4	90.1	-0.3	92.2	1,222	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	77.1	78.0	0.9	79.4	329	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	75.4	77.8	2.4	77.5	63	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	84.9	79.1	-5.8	87.7	154	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	70.6	73.1	2.5	72.9	167	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	94.4	91.9	-2.5	97.0	481	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	47	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	38	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	92.1	91.4	-0.7	93.9	70	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	90.0	91.5	1.5	91.8	585	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.0	98.1	0.1	99.8	546	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	89.7	93.1	3.4	92.0	131	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	89.4	92.9	3.5	91.5	39	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	96.0	97.0	1.0	98.8	41	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	85.6	89.2	3.6	87.9	67	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	99.9	99.3	-0.6	100.0	227	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	94.3	99.1	4.8	96.1	27	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.4	97.5	0.1	99.2	255	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	61.4	50.0	2,720	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	56.8	50.0	654	3	Met Target
High needs	55.9	50.0	741	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	54.3	50.0	162	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	59.2	50.0	339	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	52.4	50.0	370	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	64.3	50.0	1,046	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	123	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	81	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	65.0	50.0	170	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-
White	59.7	50.0	1,298	3	Met Target

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	52.6	50.0	493	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	40.2	50.0	118	2	Below Target
High needs	53.7	50.0	106	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	55.4	50.0	36	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	63.2	50.0	27	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	49.4	50.0	55	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	54.4	50.0	204	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	59.0	50.0	27	3	Met Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	51.3	50.0	228	3	Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	59.9	50.0	2,725	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	58.3	50.0	653	3	Met Target
High needs	57.7	50.0	740	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	55.1	50.0	160	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	59.7	50.0	340	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	55.0	50.0	370	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	64.4	50.0	1,049	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	122	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	81	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	60.6	50.0	170	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-
White	57.8	50.0	1,301	3	Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	60.0	50.0	495	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	54.7	50.0	117	3	Met Target
High needs	57.0	50.0	108	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	51.5	50.0	36	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	65.0	50.0	28	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	58.0	50.0	56	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	61.6	50.0	205	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	64.0	50.0	27	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	58.7	50.0	229	3	Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	96.1	98.5	2.4	98.1	529	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	87.8	93.3	5.5	91.9	120	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	88.0	90.9	2.9	92.5	77	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	83.3	90.2	6.9	89.2	61	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	96.4	100.0	3.6	99.5	182	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.5	97.6	2.1	97.6	286	3	Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.8	98.7	-0.1	100.0	545	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	97.4	97.3	-0.1	100.0	148	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	98.3	97.4	-0.9	100.0	75	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	96.8	97.6	0.8	100.0	84	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	98.6	98.8	0.2	100.0	165	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.6	98.4	-0.2	100.0	312	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.2	0.1	0.1	1.0	2,185	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.5	0.8	-0.3	1.0	394	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.9	0.8	0.1	1.0	122	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	63	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.9	-0.9	1.0	217	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	0.1	0.0	0.1	1.0	792	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	77	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	79	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	92	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.2	0.3	-0.1	1.0	1,145	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	90.4	86.9	-3.5	80.6	312	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	90.4	86.9	-3.5	80.6	312	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.0	84.4	-12.6	61.1	32	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	97.0	84.4	-12.6	61.1	32	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	2.5	2.6	-0.1	1.4	4,696	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	3.0	3.0	0.0	0.9	659	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	3.8	4.5	-0.7	1.9	1,424	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.9	7.9	-1.0	4.3	253	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	2.3	2.3	0.0	0.0	826	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	4.5	6.1	-1.6	2.1	654	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian	1.5	2.0	-0.5	0.0	1,876	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	199	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	159	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	2.1	1.9	0.2	1.0	315	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	2.7	2.9	-0.2	1.7	2,143	4	Exceeded Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	3.9	4.4	-0.5	2.8	2,307	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	4.8	2.2	2.6	2.7	136	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	8.9	11.2	-2.3	7.0	528	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	10.4	10.5	-0.1	7.8	133	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	3.9	9.7	-5.8	0.5	145	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	12.2	12.9	-0.7	9.8	318	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian	1.5	2.6	-1.1	0.0	818	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	80	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	89	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5.2	5.3	-0.1	4.1	114	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	4.9	5.0	-0.1	3.9	1,203	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	84.4	86.3	1.9	89.0	1,106	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	42.8	55.1	12.3	49.8	205	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	60.0	48.6	-11.4	69.1	70	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	77.8	82.3	4.5	83.4	62	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	26.9	44.4	17.5	32.4	117	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	92.4	95.4	3.0	98.8	373	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	37	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	43	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	79.1	95.6	16.5	83.7	45	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	82.8	82.4	-0.4	87.9	608	1	No Change

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	4,177	4,163	100	Yes	1	4,176	4,164	100	Yes	1	1,828	1,822	100	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	1,274	1,267	99	Yes	1	1,274	1,268	100	Yes	1	492	490	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	284	284	100	Yes	1	284	284	100	Yes	1	111	111	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	617	615	100	Yes	1	617	615	100	Yes	1	215	215	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	594	589	99	Yes	1	595	590	99	Yes	1	241	239	99	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	3	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Asian	1,653	1,648	100	Yes	1	1,650	1,645	100	Yes	1	730	727	100	Yes	1
Afr. Amer./Black	177	177	100	Yes	1	177	176	99	Yes	1	71	71	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	140	139	99	Yes	1	140	140	100	Yes	1	58	58	100	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	264	264	100	Yes	1	265	265	100	Yes	1	103	103	100	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
White	1,939	1,931	100	Yes	1	1,940	1,934	100	Yes	1	864	861	100	Yes	1

School Accountability Information About the Data
School	Accountability classification
Bowman	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Bridge	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Fiske	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Harrington	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Jonas Clarke Middle	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Joseph Estabrook	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Lexington Children's Place	Insufficient data
Lexington High	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Maria Hastings	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Wm Diamond Middle	Not requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms