Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Belmont

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Belmont

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Belmont (00260000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I District
REGION Coastal	GRADES SERVED PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
Meeting targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets	-

This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	12	12	60.0	7	8	67.5	10	12	47.5	7	8	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	20.0	6	8	22.5	4	8	22.5	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	3	4	10.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-	1	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	3	4	10.0	1	4	10.0	7	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		9.0	9.6	-	6.2	7.6	-	8.2	10.7	-	5.6	7.6	-
Percentage of possible points		94%		-	82%		-	77%		-	74%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		88% Weight of non-high school results:70%						76% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		84%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	10	12	67.5	9	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	6	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	2	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	4	10.0	2	8	10.0
Weighted total		8.5	10.3	-	6.6	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		83%		-	62%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		83% Weight of non-high school results:70%			62% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		77%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	512.1	515.6	3.5	513.9	2,200	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	489.3	494.5	5.2	493.7	405	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	497.5	500.7	3.2	499.0	592	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	500.4	501.0	0.6	502.0	203	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	248	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	488.6	490.0	1.4	490.0	265	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	518.6	522.4	3.8	520.4	411	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	77	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	112	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	149	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White	512.1	515.6	3.5	514.1	1,446	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.6	99.0	0.4	100.0	342	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	98.6	100.0	1.4	100.0	77	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	92.9	95.4	2.5	94.8	76	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	89.6	95.2	5.6	91.4	42	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	93.5	92.4	-1.1	95.8	33	1	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	99.2	98.2	-1.0	100.0	57	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.8	99.4	0.6	100.0	241	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	515.8	516.4	0.6	517.5	2,201	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	490.6	493.3	2.7	493.2	406	3	Met Target
High needs	500.9	502.9	2.0	502.4	595	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	500.8	500.7	-0.1	501.9	204	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	250	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	490.5	490.7	0.2	492.0	266	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	527.7	528.3	0.6	530.1	412	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	77	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	112	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	149	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White	514.5	515.4	0.9	516.2	1,446	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.1	97.4	-0.7	99.9	340	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	97.6	94.5	-3.1	100.0	77	3	Met Target
High needs	89.5	90.2	0.7	92.0	74	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	89.0	91.7	2.7	91.7	42	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	83.9	85.9	2.0	86.8	32	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	98.3	98.2	-0.1	100.0	56	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.2	98.0	-0.2	100.0	240	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	91.5	90.5	-1.0	93.3	723	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	78.2	79.2	1.0	80.5	201	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	80.5	76.7	-3.8	82.6	73	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	70	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	71.4	70.1	-1.3	73.7	97	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	97.0	96.8	-0.2	99.6	131	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	37	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	48	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	91.7	90.8	-0.9	93.5	480	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.9	97.3	1.4	97.7	311	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	81.1	87.3	6.2	83.4	61	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	31	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	75.8	82.0	6.2	78.1	32	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	96.5	97.2	0.7	99.1	45	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	96.9	98.2	1.3	98.7	224	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	57.8	50.0	1,686	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	51.3	50.0	404	3	Met Target
High needs	52.9	50.0	427	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	50.2	50.0	160	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	155	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	47.7	50.0	193	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	61.4	50.0	305	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	64	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	87	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	118	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-
White	57.8	50.0	1,107	3	Met Target

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	44.6	50.0	282	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	31.2	50.0	69	1	Below Target
High needs	46.6	50.0	49	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	48.5	50.0	27	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	44.0	50.0	25	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	51.8	50.0	41	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	44.4	50.0	204	2	Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	58.8	50.0	1,686	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	53.8	50.0	403	3	Met Target
High needs	56.2	50.0	427	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	55.1	50.0	160	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	156	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	50.8	50.0	193	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	64.6	50.0	306	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	64	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	87	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	118	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-
White	57.9	50.0	1,106	3	Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	47.4	50.0	282	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	37.9	50.0	69	1	Below Target
High needs	48.5	50.0	49	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	43.5	50.0	27	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	52.0	50.0	25	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	51.5	50.0	41	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	48.8	50.0	204	2	Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	96.3	96.6	0.3	98.3	297	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	91.5	88.3	-3.2	95.6	60	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	93.0	91.4	-1.6	97.5	35	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	82.8	73.9	-8.9	88.7	23	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	98.4	95.6	-2.8	100.0	45	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.4	98.0	2.6	97.5	205	4	Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.3	97.2	-0.1	98.9	320	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	94.2	95.1	0.9	97.7	82	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	98.0	94.8	-3.2	100.0	57	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	91.7	93.1	1.4	96.6	29	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	98.0	98.4	0.4	100.0	63	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.5	96.8	-1.7	100.0	217	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.1	0.2	-0.1	1.0	1,264	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.0	0.6	-0.6	1.0	181	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	1.2	-1.2	1.0	82	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.4	-1.4	1.0	72	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	212	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	58	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	44	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	66	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	0.1	0.1	0.0	1.0	883	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	86.3	85.8	-0.5	80.6	190	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	190	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	4.7	4.0	0.7	3.6	3,012	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	6.8	6.9	-0.1	4.7	406	1	No Change
High needs	8.5	5.9	2.6	6.6	829	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.1	11.1	1.0	9.5	208	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	461	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	13.3	7.3	6.0	10.9	331	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian	3.3	1.8	1.5	1.4	609	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	95	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	139	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	228	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
White	4.6	3.9	0.7	3.6	1,933	3	Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	5.6	5.4	0.2	4.5	1,346	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	2.8	5.2	-2.4	0.7	77	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	14.8	13.5	1.3	12.9	252	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	17.6	13.9	3.7	15.0	101	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	76	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	21.0	19.8	1.2	18.6	121	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	2.3	3.0	-0.7	0.4	234	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	57	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	51	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	61	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	5.7	5.0	0.7	4.7	941	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	88.9	85.8	-3.1	93.5	632	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	53.5	44.6	-8.9	60.5	92	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	69.4	43.5	-25.9	78.5	46	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	31	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	18.9	23.1	4.2	24.4	39	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	94.0	93.0	-1.0	100.0	115	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	90.4	86.9	-3.5	95.5	442	3	Met Target

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	2,587	2,576	100	Yes	1	2,585	2,576	100	Yes	1	1,082	1,081	100	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	710	702	99	Yes	1	708	704	99	Yes	1	293	292	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	255	253	99	Yes	1	255	254	100	Yes	1	120	120	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	303	300	99	Yes	1	302	302	100	Yes	1	102	102	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	305	301	99	Yes	1	304	301	99	Yes	1	134	133	99	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	0	-	-	-	-
Asian	492	490	100	Yes	1	491	491	100	Yes	1	195	195	100	Yes	1
Afr. Amer./Black	90	90	100	Yes	1	90	90	100	Yes	1	39	39	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	132	130	98	Yes	1	132	130	98	Yes	1	55	54	98	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	165	165	100	Yes	1	165	165	100	Yes	1	63	63	100	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	3	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
White	1,703	1,696	100	Yes	1	1,702	1,695	100	Yes	1	729	729	100	Yes	1

School Accountability Information About the Data
School	Accountability classification
Belmont High	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Daniel Butler	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Mary Lee Burbank	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Roger E Wellington	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Winn Brook	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Winthrop L Chenery Middle	Not requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms