Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Blackstone Millville RHS

District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Blackstone Millville RHS

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Blackstone-Millville (06220000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
58% - Substantial progress toward targets37.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage68%51%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
58%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage68%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage77%54%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
63%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage54% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage77%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
54

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.9 99.2 2.3 98.4 944Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing---- 19--
High needs 93.1 97.7 4.6 95.2 334Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.9 98.8 1.9 99.0 214Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 99.1 1.7 99.0 824Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.3 91.9 -0.4 94.1 961No Change
Lowest Performing---- 21--
High needs 82.6 82.1 -0.5 85.2 351No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.4 81.5 -3.9 88.0 230Declined
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.4 91.6 -0.8 94.4 831No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.1 92.2 2.1 92.0 873Met Target
Lowest Performing---- 21--
High needs 79.7 87.1 7.4 82.1 294Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.4 92.0 1.6 92.2 753Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 51.8 863Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing- 19--
High needs 54.0 283Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.9 202Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 50.4 753Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 46.6 872Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing- 20--
High needs 45.2 302Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.9 222Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 4--
Students w/ disabilities- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 47.1 752Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 92.6 87.8 -4.8 94.7 980Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.7 75.6 -10.1 89.6 410Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.3 70.4 -14.9 89.4 270Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.9 88.2 -4.7 95.4 930Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.7 93.4 -3.3 98.6 1210Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 98.0 87.8 -10.2 100.0 490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.8 85.3 -12.5 100.0 340Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.5 93.8 -2.7 98.3 1130Declined

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.2 2.2 0.0 2.0 4051No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.3 4.5 2.2 2.1 1320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.5 3.7 1.2 2.3 810Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 61--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.7 2.2 0.5 1.5 3680Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 12.4 12.5 0.1 10.1 4471No Change
Lowest Performing---- 21--
High needs 22.4 20.8 -1.6 18.6 1542Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 28.0 23.7 -4.3 22.9 932Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 64--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 31--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 12.6 12.1 -0.5 10.1 3982Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.0 58.1 7.1 57.5 2173Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 21.1 24.6 3.5 28.5 692Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.6 31.3 0.7 38.4 482Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 52.5 58.0 5.5 59.0 2003Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles