Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Medway High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Medway High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Medway (01770000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
74% - Substantial progress toward targets82.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage62%82%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
74%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage82%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage62%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage52%67%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
61%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage67% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage52%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
76

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.4 99.8 0.4 100.0 1524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.6 99.3 1.7 99.2 384Exceeded Target
High needs 97.0 99.1 2.1 98.9 284Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 100.0 0.7 100.0 1274Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.1 98.7 2.6 97.7 1504Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 85.6 94.4 8.8 87.7 364Exceeded Target
High needs 83.9 92.6 8.7 85.9 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.0 98.8 2.8 97.6 1254Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.1 96.6 1.5 96.8 1473Met Target
Lowest Performing 84.1 87.5 3.4 86.4 383Met Target
High needs 81.4 88.0 6.6 84.0 274Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.9 96.3 1.4 96.6 1233Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 45.0 1502Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 35.5 371Low Growth
High needs 51.7 263Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged- 15--
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black- 4--
Hispanic/Latino- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 46.6 1252Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 50.8 1493Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 37.6 361Low Growth
High needs 46.8 262Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged- 15--
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black- 4--
Hispanic/Latino- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 50.9 1243Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.4 97.5 -0.9 99.5 2003Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.6 89.8 -0.8 93.8 490Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 97.3 -1.0 99.7 1833Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 98.4 1.3 98.1 1873Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.0 90.6 -2.4 95.6 320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 98.3 0.9 98.6 1763Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.8 0.5 1.0 7283Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.7 3.0 1.3 1.5 1340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 69--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 82--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 24--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.3 0.6 0.3 1.0 6533Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.5 8.1 -5.4 12.4 7084Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 25.0 18.4 -6.6 21.0 384Exceeded Target
High needs 37.5 23.6 -13.9 34.4 1484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 55--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 93--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 29--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 13.0 7.8 -5.2 11.6 6254Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.7 87.2 -5.5 95.4 3673Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 74.6 63.2 -11.4 81.2 680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 44--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 92.8 86.9 -5.9 95.6 3283Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles