Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Georgetown High School

District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Georgetown High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Georgetown (01050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting or exceeding targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
87% - Meeting or exceeding targets89.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage77%94%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
87%
Meeting or exceeding targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage94%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage77%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage--
Weight--
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
-
-
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage- Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage-

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.8 100.0 0.2 100.0 894Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 99.0 100.0 1.0 100.0 224Exceeded Target
High needs---- 11--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.7 100.0 0.3 100.0 874Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 98.9 1.9 98.6 904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 88.5 96.6 8.1 90.6 224Exceeded Target
High needs---- 11--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.7 98.9 2.2 98.3 884Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.8 98.5 2.7 97.5 844Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 82.3 94.3 12.0 84.6 224Exceeded Target
High needs---- 8--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 3--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.7 98.5 2.8 97.4 824Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 57.6 853Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 46.0 212Typical Growth - Low
High needs- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged- 6--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 57.7 833Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 67.8 864Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing 57.7 213Typical Growth - High
High needs- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged- 6--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 67.6 844Exceeded Typical Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.7 98.2 2.5 96.8 1094Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 33--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.6 98.0 2.4 97.0 1004Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.0 95.7 -2.3 99.0 933Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 21--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.0 95.6 -3.4 100.0 903Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.7 0.5 -0.2 1.0 4014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 75--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 36--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 52--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.8 0.5 -0.3 1.0 3734Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 16.3 8.3 -8.0 15.2 4004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 20.8 0.0 -20.8 16.8 224Exceeded Target
High needs---- 84--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 60--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 16.4 7.8 -8.6 15.0 3714Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.6 58.5 2.9 58.3 2053Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 40--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 30--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 55.8 58.2 2.4 58.6 1893Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles