Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Braintree High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Braintree High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Braintree (00400000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
64% - Substantial progress toward targets74.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage61%66%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
64%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage61%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage62%37%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
47%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage37% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage62%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
81

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 98.9 -0.6 100.0 4194Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 99.0 97.6 -1.4 100.0 1044Exceeded Target
High needs 98.3 96.9 -1.4 100.0 1431No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.3 97.0 -2.3 100.0 661No Change
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 98.1 96.3 -1.8 100.0 801No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 99.2 97.7 -1.5 100.0 754Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 23--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.4 99.2 -0.2 100.0 2984Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.5 97.4 -0.1 99.2 4173Met Target
Lowest Performing 91.5 92.1 0.6 94.2 1042Improved Below Target
High needs 93.8 92.4 -1.4 96.1 1421No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.3 94.9 -0.4 98.1 641No Change
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities 91.7 89.1 -2.6 94.3 800Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 99.7 -0.3 100.0 744Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 23--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.5 97.1 -0.4 99.2 2973Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 96.0 -0.2 97.9 4041No Change
Lowest Performing 85.1 87.6 2.5 88.6 1053Met Target
High needs 90.5 90.1 -0.4 93.1 1341No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.4 92.8 0.4 95.2 592Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 86.5 84.6 -1.9 89.2 781No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 99.2 97.6 -1.6 100.0 734Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.4 96.2 -0.2 98.3 2911No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 51.1 3883Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 40.2 962Typical Growth - Low
High needs 48.4 1222Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.9 532Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 50.2 713Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 50.2 693Typical Growth - High
Afr. Amer./Black- 22--
Hispanic/Latino- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 51.3 2783Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 57.2 3873Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 52.7 973Typical Growth - High
High needs 55.7 1223Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 54.4 523Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 55.8 723Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 64.1 694Exceeded Typical Growth
Afr. Amer./Black- 22--
Hispanic/Latino- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 55.6 2773Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 94.4 -1.8 98.0 4260Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.5 87.0 -5.5 95.9 1620Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.2 83.7 -7.5 95.7 1040Declined
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 91.9 81.3 -10.6 97.6 910Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 100.0 97.9 -2.1 100.0 483Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 24--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 96.1 -1.3 99.2 3343Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.4 98.0 1.6 98.1 3943Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.7 95.4 1.7 97.6 1733Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.8 94.4 2.6 96.1 1252Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 96.2 95.3 -0.9 100.0 863Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 384Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 26--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 96.1 98.7 2.6 97.9 3064Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.0 0.5 -0.5 1.0 1,6554Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.7 1.2 -1.5 2.4 5184Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.0 1.9 -2.1 3.6 2624Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 37--
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 2.0 -0.6 2.3 3054Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 0.5 0.0 -0.5 1.0 2494Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 94--
Hispanic/Latino---- 70--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.9 0.4 -0.5 1.0 1,2274Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.3 57.1 14.8 47.8 214Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.8 12.3 2.5 8.5 1,6870Declined
Lowest Performing 15.8 17.1 1.3 11.0 1050Declined
High needs 17.8 19.6 1.8 15.5 6280Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.9 21.7 -0.2 17.3 2762Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 89--
Students w/ disabilities 17.8 20.6 2.8 14.2 3500Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 3.6 5.6 2.0 0.5 2854Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 90--
Hispanic/Latino---- 88--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 9.8 12.9 3.1 8.4 1,2030Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.0 67.4 -2.6 74.4 8110Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 47.4 45.5 -1.9 54.5 2880Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.6 51.4 2.8 56.3 1482Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 40--
Students w/ disabilities 40.5 30.9 -9.6 47.9 1650Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 87.2 85.7 -1.5 92.4 1263Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 48--
Hispanic/Latino---- 41--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 71.5 65.3 -6.2 76.5 5910Declined


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles