Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Southeastern Regional Vocational Technical

Districts Schools

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Southeastern Regional Vocational Technical

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Southeastern Regional Vocational Technical (08720000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I District
REGION Coastal	GRADES SERVED 09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
71% - Partially meeting targets	-

This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Needs assistance (NA)

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Achievement total	10	12	47.5	8	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	9	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		8.3	10.7	-	6.5	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		78%		-	63%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		71%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-
	Science achievement	2	4	-
	Achievement total	9	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-
	High school completion total	9	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		7.8	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		73%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		73%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.4	98.4	0.0	99.8	358	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	94.4	94.3	-0.1	96.2	88	1	No Change
High needs	97.5	97.8	0.3	99.5	208	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	97.8	98.1	0.3	100.0	154	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	95.8	97.4	1.6	98.6	57	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	94.6	95.9	1.3	97.1	61	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	97.1	97.1	0.0	99.5	122	1	No Change
Hispanic/Latino	98.8	98.4	-0.4	100.0	46	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.3	99.2	-0.1	100.0	156	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	88.1	90.0	1.9	89.8	357	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	56.8	65.1	8.3	59.6	88	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	83.7	85.8	2.1	85.8	208	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	85.2	86.9	1.7	88.3	154	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	78.8	78.6	-0.2	83.3	56	1	No Change
Students w/ disabilities	72.5	81.0	8.5	75.5	62	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	81.1	83.6	2.5	86.3	122	2	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	89.9	83.7	-6.2	92.5	46	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	27	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	92.0	95.8	3.8	93.6	155	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	82.2	85.1	2.9	83.9	342	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	62.6	67.0	4.4	66.9	88	3	Met Target
High needs	78.2	79.6	1.4	81.0	199	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	79.6	82.1	2.5	82.5	145	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	73.7	74.5	0.8	80.0	54	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	71.4	69.6	-1.8	74.4	60	1	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	77.9	79.6	1.7	79.9	113	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	80.4	79.4	-1.0	83.3	45	1	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	85.0	90.3	5.3	86.8	152	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	52.3	50.0	333	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	40.8	50.0	83	2	Below Target
High needs	51.2	50.0	194	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	50.4	50.0	143	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	49.1	50.0	55	2	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	50.5	50.0	57	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	49.8	50.0	106	2	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	49.0	50.0	44	2	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	54.8	50.0	151	3	Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	55.0	50.0	333	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	38.3	50.0	84	1	Below Target
High needs	53.5	50.0	195	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	52.4	50.0	144	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	51.9	50.0	55	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	53.8	50.0	58	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	49.6	50.0	107	2	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	52.7	50.0	44	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	25	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	58.6	50.0	150	3	Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.0	97.3	0.3	99.3	329	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	96.9	96.1	-0.8	100.0	230	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.5	95.5	-1.0	100.0	201	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	97.3	97.7	0.4	100.0	86	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	97.8	97.6	-0.2	100.0	83	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	97.1	94.9	-2.2	99.4	39	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	96.4	97.4	1.0	98.5	194	3	Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.3	97.7	-0.6	100.0	301	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	98.6	97.4	-1.2	100.0	228	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	98.9	97.0	-1.9	100.0	199	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	95.4	97.3	1.9	100.0	74	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	100.0	98.9	-1.1	100.0	93	3	Met Target
Hispanic/Latino	95.0	97.1	2.1	96.7	35	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.2	97.0	-1.2	100.0	168	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.4	0.4	0.0	1.0	1,416	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.5	0.5	0.0	1.0	779	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.6	0.7	-0.1	1.0	553	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.6	0.7	-0.1	1.0	300	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	0.5	0.2	0.3	1.0	461	4	Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino	0.6	0.6	0.0	1.0	165	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	55	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.3	0.6	-0.3	1.0	714	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	14.2	9.8	4.4	13.1	1,444	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	5.6	4.5	1.1	0.0	88	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	17.1	11.9	5.2	14.7	784	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	19.9	14.2	5.7	15.3	499	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	8.9	8.5	0.4	7.8	211	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	17.0	14.2	2.8	13.9	225	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	11.4	10.4	1.0	7.6	491	2	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino	19.3	9.4	9.9	15.2	171	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	73	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	14.9	10.2	4.7	13.7	687	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	56.4	53.5	-2.9	62.1	695	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	37.3	35.4	-1.9	45.8	359	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	38.4	38.1	-0.3	48.8	268	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	25.9	27.1	1.2	31.6	85	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	28.5	24.4	-4.1	35.8	127	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	45.0	41.7	-3.3	52.8	247	0	Declined
Hispanic/Latino	47.9	50.7	2.8	57.2	75	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	64.3	61.1	-3.2	69.6	347	0	Declined

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	359	358	100	Yes	1	358	357	100	Yes	1	359	359	100	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	209	208	100	Yes	1	208	208	100	Yes	1	209	209	100	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	154	154	100	Yes	1	154	154	100	Yes	1	154	154	100	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	57	57	100	Yes	1	56	56	100	Yes	1	57	57	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	62	61	98	Yes	1	62	62	100	Yes	1	62	62	100	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	7	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	123	122	99	Yes	1	122	122	100	Yes	1	123	123	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	46	46	100	Yes	1	46	46	100	Yes	1	46	46	100	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	27	27	100	Yes	1	27	27	100	Yes	1	27	27	100	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	156	156	100	Yes	1	156	155	99	Yes	1	156	156	100	Yes	1

School Accountability Information About the Data
School	Accountability classification
Southeastern Regional Vocational Technical	Not requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms