Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Masconomet Regional High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Masconomet Regional High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Masconomet (07050000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
77% - Meeting targets92
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage77%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Weighted total---
Percentage of possible points --
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 92

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.8 99.7 -0.1 100.0 2764Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 99.3 98.9 -0.4 100.0 674Exceeded Target
High needs 98.9 98.3 -0.6 100.0 454Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 97.9 -2.1 100.0 364Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.8 99.7 -0.1 100.0 2584Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.3 98.5 0.2 99.8 2764Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 93.8 93.7 -0.1 95.8 671No Change
High needs 91.0 92.8 1.8 93.2 453Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 89.0 91.0 2.0 92.0 363Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.2 98.6 0.4 99.8 2584Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 99.5 1.7 99.2 2674Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 92.3 98.1 5.8 94.4 674Exceeded Target
High needs 92.6 97.7 5.1 94.9 434Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 93.4 97.1 3.7 95.7 344Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.6 99.6 2.0 99.0 2504Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 49.4 50.0 2622Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.3 50.0 621Below Target
High needs 52.7 50.0 413Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 53.6 50.0 323Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.6 50.0 2452Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.0 50.0 2612Below Target
Lowest Performing 43.4 50.0 612Below Target
High needs 45.3 50.0 402Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 47.9 50.0 312Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.4 50.0 2442Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.5 98.8 1.3 98.7 3294Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.8 95.7 2.9 96.0 703Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 34--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 91.4 93.6 2.2 96.0 472Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 98.7 1.0 99.1 3134Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.5 98.6 1.1 98.5 3603Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.5 96.4 2.9 96.3 833Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 93.0 96.6 3.6 96.5 583Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 97.7 98.8 1.1 98.8 3433Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.3 -0.1 1.0 1,1873Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2144Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 69--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1624Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 37--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.1 0.2 -0.1 1.0 1,1003Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.2 8.3 0.9 8.2 1,1473Met Target
Lowest Performing 11.8 10.4 1.4 6.5 672Improved Below Target
High needs 18.7 16.7 2.0 16.0 2392Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 68--
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities 21.4 20.0 1.4 17.5 1752Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 46--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 8.9 8.7 0.2 7.6 1,0433Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 84.6 85.2 0.6 87.8 5663Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 52.6 45.7 -6.9 60.6 1160Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 41--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 40.7 39.3 -1.4 48.2 840Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 22--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 84.7 85.8 1.1 87.7 5143Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles