Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Andover

Districts Schools

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Andover

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Andover (00090000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I District
REGION Coastal	GRADES SERVED PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
Meeting targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
77% - Meeting targets	-

This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-	1	4	-	2	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	-	-	-	1	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	10	12	60.0	8	8	67.5	6	12	47.5	6	8	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	1	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	20.0	6	8	22.5	4	8	22.5	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	3	4	10.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	1	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-	2	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	1	4	10.0	0	4	10.0	3	8	10.0	2	4	10.0
Weighted total		7.6	9.6	-	6.8	7.6	-	5.9	10.7	-	4.9	7.6	-
Percentage of possible points		79%		-	89%		-	55%		-	64%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		84% Weight of non-high school results:70%						60% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		77%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	2	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	67.5	5	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	3	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	5	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	9	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	2	4	-
	Additional indicators total	1	4	10.0	2	8	10.0
Weighted total		8.9	10.3	-	5.5	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		86%		-	51%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		86% Weight of non-high school results:70%			51% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		76%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	506.3	509.2	2.9	508.1	2,878	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	484.4	490.3	5.9	488.8	566	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	491.9	495.7	3.8	493.4	876	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	493.5	496.4	2.9	495.1	247	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	207	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	487.7	490.1	2.4	489.1	601	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Asian	513.9	517.0	3.1	515.7	547	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	69	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	173	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	78	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	505.4	507.9	2.5	507.4	2,000	3	Met Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.6	99.2	0.6	100.0	445	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	96.9	99.3	2.4	98.9	112	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	94.8	97.4	2.6	96.7	125	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	95.1	97.1	2.0	96.9	43	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	93.3	96.6	3.3	95.6	95	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	99.6	98.9	-0.7	100.0	67	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.9	99.3	0.4	100.0	334	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	506.9	507.7	0.8	508.6	2,884	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	482.8	486.2	3.4	485.4	567	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	491.8	493.8	2.0	493.3	878	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	490.6	491.3	0.7	491.7	250	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	208	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	486.8	487.4	0.6	488.3	602	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Asian	522.2	524.0	1.8	524.6	548	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	69	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	176	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	78	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	504.5	504.8	0.3	506.2	2,002	2	Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.6	96.0	-1.6	99.4	443	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	90.5	90.6	0.1	93.3	112	2	Improved Below Target
High needs	91.5	88.0	-3.5	94.0	123	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	91.8	87.8	-4.0	94.5	41	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	88.9	85.1	-3.8	91.8	94	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	99.6	98.5	-1.1	100.0	67	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.8	95.7	-2.1	99.6	333	1	No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	85.0	85.3	0.3	86.8	972	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	68.7	72.3	3.6	71.0	303	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	68.5	67.6	-0.9	70.6	94	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	62	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	64.1	66.6	2.5	66.4	216	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian	91.9	91.9	0.0	94.5	200	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	64	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	85.3	84.7	-0.6	87.1	667	3	Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	94.4	94.0	-0.4	96.2	432	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	84.6	84.9	0.3	86.9	119	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	86.9	83.5	-3.4	89.0	41	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	80.9	81.5	0.6	83.2	92	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	97.9	98.5	0.6	100.0	65	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	94.4	93.7	-0.7	96.2	325	1	No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	53.2	50.0	2,297	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	53.6	50.0	562	3	Met Target
High needs	51.6	50.0	645	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	51.8	50.0	186	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	144	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	50.0	50.0	450	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	9	-	-
Asian	56.2	50.0	430	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	48	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	133	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	62	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-
White	51.9	50.0	1,614	3	Met Target

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	38.9	50.0	393	1	Below Target
Lowest Performing	34.6	50.0	103	1	Below Target
High needs	40.3	50.0	104	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	34.4	50.0	29	1	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	42.0	50.0	81	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	41.7	50.0	60	2	Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	38.8	50.0	300	1	Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	56.7	50.0	2,302	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	54.8	50.0	562	3	Met Target
High needs	53.3	50.0	647	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	51.9	50.0	186	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	146	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	50.5	50.0	450	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	9	-	-
Asian	67.1	50.0	432	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	48	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	135	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	62	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-
White	54.5	50.0	1,615	3	Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	55.9	50.0	394	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	46.8	50.0	104	2	Below Target
High needs	52.8	50.0	104	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	45.8	50.0	29	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	54.8	50.0	81	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	46.4	50.0	60	2	Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	57.4	50.0	301	3	Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	94.3	95.8	1.5	96.3	477	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	82.6	87.2	4.6	86.7	133	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	78.9	89.3	10.4	83.4	56	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	76.2	81.7	5.5	82.1	93	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	62	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	93.7	95.1	1.4	95.8	367	3	Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.2	98.7	0.5	99.8	454	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	96.4	97.5	1.1	99.9	121	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.2	96.5	0.3	100.0	57	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	94.4	97.6	3.2	99.3	84	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	64	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.6	98.6	0.0	100.0	351	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.1	0.3	-0.2	1.0	1,788	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.0	0.8	-0.8	1.0	359	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	1.0	-1.0	1.0	102	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.1	-1.1	1.0	272	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	261	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	34	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	91	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	39	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.1	0.2	-0.1	1.0	1,362	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	89.4	85.2	-4.2	80.6	162	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	162	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	4.6	4.9	-0.3	3.5	3,816	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	6.0	8.6	-2.6	3.9	567	0	Declined
High needs	8.5	9.0	-0.5	6.6	1,172	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.0	15.1	-1.1	11.4	272	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	336	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	9.6	9.2	0.4	7.2	772	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Asian	4.7	3.8	0.9	2.8	731	3	Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	91	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	237	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	109	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	4.1	4.8	-0.7	3.1	2,636	0	Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	9.9	13.3	-3.4	8.8	1,831	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	10.2	9.8	0.4	8.1	112	2	Improved Below Target
High needs	20.1	25.6	-5.5	18.2	422	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.6	31.3	-5.7	23.0	128	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	21.4	26.5	-5.1	19.0	306	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3.4	5.4	-2.0	1.5	296	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	41	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	91	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	39	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.3	14.0	-3.7	9.3	1,364	0	Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	86.2	85.9	-0.3	90.8	865	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	43.9	46.9	3.0	50.9	162	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	69.4	65.4	-4.0	78.5	52	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	32.4	36.1	3.7	37.9	119	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	94.4	95.4	1.0	100.0	131	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	85.9	85.8	-0.1	91.0	662	3	Met Target

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	3,375	3,348	99	Yes	1	3,375	3,352	99	Yes	1	1,438	1,426	99	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	1,040	1,026	99	Yes	1	1,039	1,026	99	Yes	1	441	437	99	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	307	299	97	Yes	1	306	300	98	Yes	1	142	141	99	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	240	238	99	Yes	1	240	239	100	Yes	1	74	73	99	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	709	697	98	Yes	1	709	697	98	Yes	1	318	314	99	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	10	-	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-
Asian	625	624	100	Yes	1	626	625	100	Yes	1	270	268	99	Yes	1
Afr. Amer./Black	81	80	99	Yes	1	81	80	99	Yes	1	25	25	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	212	207	98	Yes	1	211	209	99	Yes	1	97	96	99	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	88	88	100	Yes	1	88	88	100	Yes	1	30	30	100	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
White	2,358	2,338	99	Yes	1	2,358	2,339	99	Yes	1	1,012	1,003	99	Yes	1

School Accountability Information About the Data
School	Accountability classification
Andover High	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Andover West Middle	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Bancroft Elementary	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Doherty Middle	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Henry C Sanborn Elementary	Not requiring assistance or intervention
High Plain Elementary	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Shawsheen School	Insufficient data
South Elementary	Not requiring assistance or intervention
West Elementary	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Wood Hill Middle School	Not requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms