John S Licorish, Principal Mailing Address: 70 Memorial Pkwy Randolph, MA 02368
Phone: (781) 961-6220 FAX: (781) 961-6235 Website: http://randolph.k12.ma.us/rhs
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
25
100
0
12
52
36
49.0
N/A
N/A
143
97
1
6
34
60
46.7
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
19
100
16
21
53
11
71.1
N/A
N/A
98
99
4
18
49
29
59.4
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
58
100
14
28
45
14
70.3
N/A
N/A
279
99
5
19
41
35
59.1
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
75
100
13
25
48
13
70.3
N/A
N/A
362
99
4
18
44
34
59.6
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
80
100
13
36
41
10
76.6
N/A
N/A
308
99
5
20
45
30
62.4
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
23
100
74
22
4
0
98.9
N/A
N/A
90
100
22
46
29
3
88.1
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
13
100
31
15
46
8
75.0
N/A
N/A
66
100
8
17
45
30
58.0
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26
100
8
46
19
27
76.0
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
71
99
8
30
48
14
72.2
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
70
100
19
23
47
11
73.2
N/A
N/A
316
99
6
26
43
25
66.9
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
60
100
35
37
25
3
87.5
N/A
N/A
245
100
12
27
40
21
69.1
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
40
98
0
5
50
45
47.5
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
35
100
29
17
49
6
75.7
N/A
N/A
136
99
9
20
47
24
64.0
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
130
100
26
29
37
8
79.8
N/A
N/A
561
99
9
26
42
24
67.9
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
130
98
17
48
28
6
87.1
N/A
N/A
565
99
6
28
40
25
67.6
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Randolph High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals Low assessment participation (Less than 95%)
Focus on Students w/disabilities -Economically disadvantaged -High needs -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
35
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
68
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
66
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
63
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
-
Randolph High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.1
96.9
91.7
-5.2
97.6
97.6
11
133
0
Declined
High needs
93.5
95.3
87.5
-7.8
96.8
96.8
10
76
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
93.4
95.0
86.6
-8.4
94.5
96.7
7
58
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
86.5
-
-
-
-
93.3
-
23
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
90.9
90.4
77.3
-13.1
95.5
95.5
7
22
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
95.0
98.5
97.9
-0.6
97.5
97.5
30
24
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
93.9
95.9
91.3
-4.6
97.0
97.0
22
78
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
86.6
87.0
82.3
-4.7
93.3
93.3
18
134
0
Declined
High needs
82.5
82.2
73.1
-9.1
91.3
91.3
16
79
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
75.3
85.5
73.4
-12.1
79.4
87.7
15
61
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
87.5
-
-
-
-
93.8
-
21
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
59.4
64.7
60.0
-4.7
79.7
79.7
17
25
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
95.2
95.6
99.0
3.4
97.6
97.6
65
24
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
81.9
79.8
80.3
0.5
91.0
91.0
47
80
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
81.4
87.1
79.8
-7.3
90.7
90.7
14
130
0
Declined
High needs
79.1
82.8
70.3
-12.5
89.6
89.6
9
75
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
76.5
83.3
70.3
-13.0
80.4
88.3
10
58
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
63.1
73.5
49.0
-24.5
81.6
81.6
4
25
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
92.4
93.4
98.9
5.5
96.2
96.2
71
23
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
78.0
81.9
76.6
-5.3
89.0
89.0
37
80
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
31.7
33.8
133
0
0.0
4.5
133
0
High needs
20.9
17.1
76
0
0.0
6.6
76
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
27.7
19.0
58
0
0.0
8.6
58
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.9
0.0
22
0
0.0
9.1
22
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
52.9
70.8
24
25
0.0
0.0
24
25
Afr. Amer./Black
17.6
25.6
78
25
0.0
3.8
78
0
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
36.1
41.0
134
25
9.7
15.7
134
0
High needs
24.4
26.6
79
0
14.4
25.3
79
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
32.8
27.9
61
0
12.5
26.2
61
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.9
4.0
25
25
32.4
40.0
25
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
61.8
91.7
24
25
2.9
0.0
24
25
Afr. Amer./Black
20.5
32.5
80
25
16.4
17.5
80
0
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
16.9
26.2
130
25
3.1
7.7
130
0
High needs
8.8
13.3
75
25
5.0
13.3
75
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
13.0
13.8
58
0
7.4
13.8
58
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
25
0
6.1
36.0
25
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
29.4
73.9
23
25
0.0
0.0
23
25
Afr. Amer./Black
4.8
12.5
80
25
4.8
10.0
80
0
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
55.5
58.0
2.5
51.0
No
97
75
On Target
High needs
54.5
56.5
2.0
51.0
No
48
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
55.0
43.0
-12.0
51.0
No
35
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
64.0
63.0
-1.0
51.0
Yes
22
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
58.0
56.5
-1.5
51.0
No
56
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
71.0
76.0
5.0
51.0
No
99
100
Above Target
High needs
70.0
75.5
5.5
51.0
No
50
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
71.0
70.0
-1.0
51.0
No
37
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
77.0
86.5
9.5
51.0
Yes
22
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
66.0
68.5
2.5
51.0
No
58
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
53.0
60.0
43
0
High needs
53.0
60.0
43
0
EL and Former EL
53.0
60.0
43
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
86.1
81.6
-4.5
80.0
90.0
201
75
On Target
High needs
83.0
78.5
-4.5
80.0
90.0
149
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
67.7
73.3
5.6
80.0
90.0
30
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
43.2
69.0
25.8
80.0
90.0
42
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Asian
97.3
90.6
-6.7
80.0
90.0
32
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
86.8
81.0
-5.8
80.0
90.0
116
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
24
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
23
-
-
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
79.3
89.3
10.0
85.0
95.0
187
75
On Target
High needs
75.0
87.4
12.4
85.0
95.0
135
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
96.7
83.9
-12.8
85.0
95.0
31
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
23
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Asian
96.9
97.3
0.4
85.0
95.0
37
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
77.2
89.5
12.3
85.0
95.0
114
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
22
-
-
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
4.0
1.7
1.2
0.5
2.0
2.0
48
694
75
On Target
High needs
4.7
2.1
1.0
1.1
2.4
2.4
71
408
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
1.6
1.6
1.5
0.1
1.5
0.8
63
266
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
3.6
1.4
1.4
0.0
1.8
1.8
77
70
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
4.7
3.7
0.7
3.0
2.4
2.4
76
143
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Asian
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.0
0.4
0.4
18
119
25
No Change
Afr. Amer./Black
3.6
2.2
0.8
1.4
1.8
1.8
55
393
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
79
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
78
-
-
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
155
148
95
Yes
152
148
97
Yes
156
156
100
Yes
High needs
94
87
93
No
91
89
98
Yes
94
94
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
74
68
92
No
72
70
97
Yes
75
75
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
28
28
100
Yes
25
25
100
Yes
26
26
100
Yes
Students w/ disabilities
28
24
91
No
28
27
96
Yes
28
28
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
27
27
100
Yes
27
27
100
Yes
27
27
100
Yes
Afr. Amer./Black
90
84
95
Yes
91
88
97
Yes
92
92
100
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
20
20
100
Yes
18
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
9
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
