Albert G Ganem, Superintendent Mailing Address: 215 Main Street Boylston, MA 01505-2023
Phone: (508) 869-2837 FAX: (508) 869-0023 Website: http://www.bbrsd.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our district and its schools including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
252
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
12.8 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
0.0
0.9
All Schools
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
-
0.0
Enrollment and Educator Data (Continued)
Educator Quality Data for High Poverty and Low Poverty Berlin-Boylston Public Schools
School
Highly Qualified %
Not Highly Qualified %
Licensed %
Low Poverty
Tahanto Regional High
100.0
0.0
100.0
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
37
100
5
46
41
8
77.7
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
16
100
19
50
25
6
84.4
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
52
98
8
54
33
6
82.2
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
149
99
26
51
21
2
90.6
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
92
100
28
51
18
2
91.6
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
70
99
24
50
24
1
89.6
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
10
91
10
80
10
0
95.0
N/A
N/A
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
162
99
27
51
21
2
90.7
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
167
99
27
53
17
3
92.7
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 6 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
0
52
39
4
4
88.0
67.0
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
15
100
0
47
40
7
7
86.7
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
78
99
13
65
18
3
1
95.2
69.0
73
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
50
100
8
68
20
2
2
95.5
70.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
34
97
21
62
15
3
0
95.6
57.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
69
99
16
70
13
1
0
97.5
68.0
63
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
78
99
14
67
15
3
1
96.2
68.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
84
99
13
65
18
2
1
95.5
68.0
78
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
85
99
18
55
22
5
0
93.6
65.0
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
23
100
4
39
30
26
0
77.2
54.0
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
15
100
7
40
27
27
0
75.0
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
78
99
13
53
23
12
0
89.1
57.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
50
100
12
58
22
8
0
91.0
59.0
47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
34
97
12
47
26
15
0
87.5
56.0
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
69
99
13
57
23
7
0
92.8
59.0
62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
78
99
13
54
24
9
0
90.1
57.0
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
84
99
12
54
24
11
0
89.6
57.0
77
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
85
99
12
47
31
8
2
86.3
56.0
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 7 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
24
96
0
33
38
25
4
83.3
18.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
11
100
0
55
36
9
0
93.2
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
13
100
0
15
38
38
8
73.1
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
76
100
16
55
17
11
1
93.1
24.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
43
98
9
58
16
14
2
91.3
24.0
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
42
100
31
45
17
7
0
95.2
27.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
9
90
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
72
99
24
58
13
6
0
96.9
25.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
74
99
23
51
14
11
1
93.2
26.0
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
85
99
20
52
16
11
1
93.2
25.0
81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
82
100
13
45
29
11
1
89.3
43.0
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 7 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
24
96
4
17
50
17
13
61.5
43.0
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
11
100
9
36
55
0
0
86.4
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
13
100
0
0
46
31
23
44.2
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
76
100
9
41
39
7
4
80.6
47.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
43
98
12
40
35
7
7
78.5
41.0
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
42
100
12
40
38
7
2
81.5
52.0
41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
9
90
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
72
99
14
47
35
3
1
86.5
44.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
74
99
12
41
34
8
5
79.1
48.0
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
85
99
12
40
36
7
5
80.0
45.0
81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
82
100
4
44
39
11
2
75.3
38.0
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 8 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
31
100
3
45
32
10
10
79.8
60.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
24
100
0
38
38
13
13
75.0
60.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
74
97
7
53
28
9
3
88.2
56.0
74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
48
100
8
52
31
6
2
89.6
60.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
31
94
10
48
23
13
6
85.5
49.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
55
96
13
56
24
7
0
93.6
53.0
55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
71
97
8
51
30
10
1
89.1
53.0
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
79
98
9
51
28
9
4
88.0
56.0
79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
82
96
10
68
11
9
2
90.5
57.0
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 8 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
31
100
0
32
45
19
3
88.7
29.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
8
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
24
100
0
21
50
25
4
86.5
22.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
76
100
4
54
33
8
1
95.4
32.0
76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
48
100
6
38
46
10
0
94.8
28.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
33
100
6
73
12
6
3
96.2
50.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
57
100
9
65
25
2
0
99.1
39.0
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
73
100
7
52
33
8
0
96.6
34.0
73
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
81
100
6
52
32
9
1
95.4
34.0
81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
82
96
12
54
24
7
2
95.7
34.0
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
78
99
0
38
41
17
4
86.9
33.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
25
100
0
52
36
8
4
89.0
32.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
52
100
0
27
44
23
6
83.2
33.0
50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
230
100
11
58
23
7
1
94.6
41.0
221
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
141
99
8
55
28
9
1
94.0
39.0
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
109
99
20
59
15
6
1
95.6
47.0
104
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
9
90
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
198
99
17
64
16
3
0
97.7
43.0
190
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
225
99
15
57
20
7
1
95.3
44.0
216
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
11
92
9
55
27
9
0
97.7
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
250
99
13
56
22
7
1
94.7
43.0
240
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
249
98
14
51
25
8
1
92.9
44.0
243
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
78
99
4
35
37
17
8
73.4
57.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
25
100
8
44
32
8
8
83.0
58.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
52
100
2
29
37
21
12
67.3
57.0
50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
6
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
228
99
10
49
30
9
2
86.0
53.0
218
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
141
99
11
50
29
7
3
86.7
54.0
135
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
107
97
11
45
30
11
3
84.6
52.0
102
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
9
90
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
196
98
13
53
28
6
1
90.7
51.0
187
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
223
98
11
48
29
9
2
86.1
51.0
213
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Former ELL
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
11
92
0
36
45
0
18
70.5
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
248
98
11
48
29
9
3
85.8
53.0
237
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
249
98
8
53
27
9
2
84.1
52.0
243
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Berlin-Boylston
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
87
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
82
Met Target
High needs
71
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
69
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
78
Met Target
Berlin-Boylston: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.3
94.6
95.9
1.3
97.8
98.2
84
331
75
On Target
High needs
87.0
86.7
89.3
2.6
92.4
93.5
74
98
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
88.5
88.5
91.7
3.2
89.5
94.3
77
33
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
83.3
82.8
85.9
3.1
90.3
91.7
88
64
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
96.5
95.5
95.8
0.3
98.0
98.3
76
303
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
84.5
87.6
87.9
0.3
91.0
92.3
80
331
75
On Target
High needs
63.9
70.4
75.3
4.9
78.9
82.0
78
100
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
76.4
76.4
85.6
9.2
78.4
88.2
91
33
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
57.1
60.4
68.2
7.8
75.0
78.6
87
66
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
84.8
88.6
87.9
-0.7
91.1
92.4
69
303
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
88.7
92.7
90.7
-2.0
93.4
94.4
93
162
100
Above Target
High needs
76.5
80.3
82.2
1.9
86.3
88.3
90
52
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
72.1
-
-
-
-
86.1
-
37
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
89.5
93.4
90.6
-2.8
93.9
94.8
85
149
100
Above Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
29.5
30.8
331
0
1.5
0.9
331
25
High needs
2.1
12.2
98
25
4.3
3.1
98
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
5.4
21.2
33
25
5.4
3.0
33
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
7.8
64
25
6.6
4.7
64
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
29.7
29.7
303
0
1.0
1.0
303
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
40.0
39.9
331
0
6.6
6.0
331
0
High needs
12.9
18.0
100
25
17.2
16.0
100
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
27.0
33.3
33
25
16.2
6.1
33
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
3.3
7.6
66
25
23.3
24.2
66
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
40.3
38.6
303
0
5.2
5.6
303
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
26.9
26.5
162
0
2.4
1.9
162
25
High needs
3.0
7.7
52
25
9.1
5.8
52
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
37
-
-
-
37
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
27.7
25.5
149
0
1.9
2.0
149
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
51.0
49.5
-1.5
51.0
Yes
316
75
On Target
High needs
52.5
43.0
-9.5
51.0
No
95
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
36.5
35.5
-1.0
51.0
Yes
32
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
56.0
47.5
-8.5
51.0
No
62
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
52.0
48.0
-4.0
51.0
No
289
50
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
54.0
57.0
3.0
51.0
No
313
75
On Target
High needs
53.0
60.0
7.0
51.0
Yes
95
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
49.0
63.5
14.5
51.0
Yes
32
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
53.0
60.0
7.0
51.0
Yes
62
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
53.0
57.0
4.0
51.0
No
286
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
4
-
High needs
-
60.0
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
4
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.5
98.3
6.8
80.0
90.0
59
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
20
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
11
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
92.9
98.2
5.3
80.0
90.0
57
100
Above Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.5
91.5
1.0
85.0
95.0
71
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
23
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
90.0
92.9
2.9
85.0
95.0
70
75
On Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
0.7
2.5
0.3
2.2
0.4
0.4
80
297
75
On Target
High needs
1.7
4.9
0.0
4.9
1.0
0.9
91
49
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
7.1
0.0
7.1
0.0
0.0
88
33
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
0.7
2.2
0.4
1.8
0.4
0.4
67
278
75
On Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
337
332
99
Yes
337
332
99
Yes
165
164
99
Yes
High needs
103
99
96
Yes
103
101
98
Yes
54
53
98
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
34
33
97
Yes
34
33
97
Yes
16
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
67
64
96
Yes
67
66
99
Yes
38
38
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
11
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
308
304
99
Yes
308
304
99
Yes
152
151
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.