Scott Morrison, Superintendent Mailing Address: 28 Middleton Road Boxford, MA 01921
Phone: (978) 887-0771 FAX: (978) 887-8042 Website: http://www.tritownschoolunion.com
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our district and its schools including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
281
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
12.5 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
1.9
0.9
All Schools
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
-
0.0
Enrollment and Educator Data (Continued)
Educator Quality Data for High Poverty and Low Poverty Topsfield Public Schools
School
Highly Qualified %
Not Highly Qualified %
Licensed %
Low Poverty
Proctor Elementary
100.0
0.0
100.0
Steward Elementary
100.0
0.0
100.0
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
20
91
0
40
30
20
10
77.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
19
95
0
37
32
21
11
76.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
64
98
6
72
11
8
3
91.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
39
100
3
72
13
10
3
90.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
31
94
10
71
10
6
3
92.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
51
98
8
84
4
4
0
97.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
68
100
6
72
12
7
3
91.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
70
97
6
71
11
9
3
91.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
75
100
9
63
17
5
5
90.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
21
96
10
43
19
19
10
79.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
20
100
10
40
20
20
10
78.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
65
100
28
49
14
6
3
93.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
39
100
33
46
18
0
3
97.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
32
97
19
56
9
13
3
89.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
51
98
33
55
12
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
68
100
28
51
15
3
3
95.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
71
99
27
51
14
6
3
93.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
75
100
7
65
16
7
5
92.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
13
93
0
31
31
23
15
59.6
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
11
92
0
27
27
27
18
54.5
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
74
99
26
53
15
4
3
89.2
66.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
34
97
21
56
9
9
6
86.0
58.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
43
100
30
51
19
0
0
92.4
68.0
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
66
100
30
58
12
0
0
95.5
66.0
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
74
99
27
54
14
3
3
90.5
66.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
77
99
26
53
14
4
3
89.6
66.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
85
99
16
52
22
9
0
85.3
41.0
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
13
93
0
38
31
15
15
67.3
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
11
92
0
27
36
18
18
61.4
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
74
99
8
65
20
4
3
89.5
61.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
34
97
9
68
15
6
3
90.4
63.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
43
100
7
63
26
2
2
89.0
58.0
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
66
100
9
71
18
2
0
94.3
61.0
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
74
99
8
65
22
4
1
90.2
61.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
77
99
8
65
21
4
3
89.6
61.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
85
99
5
54
28
11
2
83.8
64.0
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
29
97
0
38
48
14
0
82.8
37.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
9
90
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
21
95
0
29
52
19
0
78.6
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
82
99
12
59
23
6
0
92.4
51.0
76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
45
100
2
58
33
7
0
91.1
37.0
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
44
98
23
57
16
5
0
94.3
58.0
43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
68
100
16
66
16
1
0
97.1
58.0
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
80
100
14
57
23
6
0
92.8
52.0
74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
89
99
12
57
25
6
0
92.7
51.0
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
98
100
9
65
20
5
0
93.9
49.0
91
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
29
97
0
52
24
14
10
81.0
66.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
10
100
0
60
40
0
0
95.0
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
21
95
0
48
19
19
14
76.2
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
82
99
11
62
17
6
4
91.5
63.0
76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
44
98
11
64
14
7
5
90.3
67.0
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
45
100
9
64
18
7
2
92.2
63.0
44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
68
100
13
69
15
3
0
96.0
64.0
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
79
99
11
65
13
8
4
90.8
64.0
73
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
89
99
10
64
16
7
3
91.3
64.0
83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
98
100
16
59
19
2
3
93.7
67.0
91
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
27
100
4
26
37
26
7
71.3
29.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
24
100
4
17
42
29
8
67.7
28.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92
100
10
64
16
8
2
91.6
42.0
91
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
46
100
7
63
22
7
2
92.4
39.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
52
100
13
63
13
8
2
91.3
42.0
51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
74
100
12
78
9
0
0
99.7
46.0
73
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
91
100
11
65
16
7
1
92.9
42.0
90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
98
100
10
63
17
7
2
91.8
42.0
97
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
84
99
23
56
19
1
1
94.3
53.0
84
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 Math
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
27
100
0
37
22
15
26
65.7
20.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
24
100
0
33
21
17
29
62.5
24.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91
99
15
59
14
4
7
89.6
53.0
90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
46
100
17
63
11
2
7
92.4
58.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
51
98
16
55
16
6
8
86.8
46.0
50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
73
99
22
67
11
0
0
98.3
60.0
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
90
99
18
61
11
4
6
91.4
56.0
89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
97
99
16
59
13
4
7
89.4
53.0
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
85
100
11
54
27
7
1
89.7
52.0
85
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
89
96
1
34
38
20
7
74.7
36.0
67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
21
88
0
48
33
14
5
82.1
--
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
75
96
1
27
40
24
8
71.1
31.0
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
12
100
8
50
33
8
0
91.7
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
312
99
13
62
17
6
2
91.3
50.0
239
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
164
99
7
62
20
8
2
90.2
39.0
119
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
170
98
19
60
15
5
1
92.5
58.0
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
259
100
17
71
11
1
0
97.4
55.0
201
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
313
100
14
62
16
6
2
92.0
52.0
236
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
334
99
13
61
17
6
2
91.4
51.0
255
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
342
99
14
59
20
5
1
91.0
48.0
258
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
90
97
2
43
23
16
16
74.2
52.0
67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
23
96
0
48
30
9
13
78.3
36.0
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
76
97
3
38
22
18
18
70.5
52.0
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
12
100
17
50
17
8
8
85.4
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
312
99
15
59
16
5
4
90.9
59.0
238
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
163
99
18
60
14
4
4
92.6
62.0
118
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
171
99
12
60
18
6
4
89.2
56.0
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Title I
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
258
99
19
66
14
1
0
97.0
61.0
200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
311
99
16
61
15
5
4
91.8
60.0
234
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
334
99
15
60
16
5
4
90.9
59.0
254
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
343
100
10
58
23
6
3
89.9
61.0
259
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Topsfield
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
One or more schools in the district classified into Level 2
This district’s determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This district’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
68
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
52
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
47
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
64
Did Not Meet Target
School Accountability Information
School
School Type
Title I Status
Accountability and Assistance Level
Proctor Elementary
Elementary School
Non-Title I School (NT)
Level 2
Steward Elementary
Elementary School
Title I School (TA)
Level 1
Topsfield: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.0
91.0
91.4
0.4
96.5
97.0
62
335
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
82.2
76.9
74.7
-2.2
89.6
91.1
26
90
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
81.1
74.0
71.1
-2.9
89.0
90.6
59
76
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
94.0
91.3
91.3
0.0
96.5
97.0
57
312
25
No Change
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.6
89.9
90.9
1.0
95.1
95.8
85
335
75
On Target
High needs
77.8
73.9
74.2
0.3
87.1
88.9
77
91
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
76.4
69.3
70.5
1.2
86.2
88.2
86
77
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.7
89.8
90.9
1.1
95.2
95.9
83
312
75
On Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.5
85.1
80.3
-4.8
95.0
95.8
41
90
0
Declined
High needs
77.2
69.5
65.0
-4.5
86.7
88.6
25
30
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
78.4
68.3
62.5
-5.8
87.4
89.2
56
22
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.8
85.5
79.8
-5.7
95.2
95.9
27
83
0
Declined
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
18.4
22.4
335
25
2.6
4.2
335
0
High needs
5.6
5.6
90
0
7.8
14.4
90
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
5.5
3.9
76
0
9.6
17.1
76
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
17.1
22.8
312
25
2.5
4.5
312
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
34.9
44.5
335
25
4.1
6.9
335
0
High needs
13.2
19.8
91
25
14.3
23.1
91
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
8.1
16.9
77
25
17.6
27.3
77
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
34.5
43.9
312
25
4.3
6.7
312
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
22.2
14.4
90
0
3.0
4.4
90
0
High needs
9.4
3.3
30
0
9.4
13.3
30
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
11.5
0.0
22
0
11.5
18.2
22
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
22.6
13.3
83
0
2.2
4.8
83
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
48.0
51.0
3.0
51.0
Yes
255
75
On Target
High needs
45.5
36.0
-9.5
51.0
No
67
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
47.0
30.5
-16.5
51.0
No
54
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
47.5
50.0
2.5
51.0
Yes
239
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
61.0
59.0
-2.0
51.0
Yes
254
75
On Target
High needs
58.0
52.0
-6.0
51.0
Yes
67
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
20
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
49.5
52.0
2.5
51.0
Yes
54
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
61.0
59.0
-2.0
51.0
Yes
238
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
2
-
High needs
-
60.0
2
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
2
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
340
336
99
Yes
340
336
99
Yes
90
90
100
Yes
High needs
95
91
96
Yes
95
92
97
Yes
30
30
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
24
-
-
-
24
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
79
76
96
Yes
79
77
97
Yes
22
22
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
12
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
315
312
99
Yes
315
312
99
Yes
83
83
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.