Anne McKenzie, Superintendent Mailing Address: 125 Russell Street Hadley, MA 01035
Phone: (413) 586-0822 FAX: (413) 582-6453 Website: http://www.hadleyschools.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our district and its schools including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
396
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
98.7
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
1.3
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
12.1 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
0.0
0.9
All Schools
High Poverty Schools
Low Poverty Schools
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
-
100.0
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
98.7
-
96.6
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
1.3
-
3.4
Enrollment and Educator Data (Continued)
Educator Quality Data for High Poverty and Low Poverty Hadley Public Schools
School
Highly Qualified %
Not Highly Qualified %
Licensed %
Low Poverty
Hopkins Academy
96.6
3.4
100.0
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
50
100
2
20
44
34
63.5
43.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
10
100
10
50
20
20
82.5
N/A
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
46
98
9
28
48
15
73.4
38.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
84
99
7
26
45
21
70.8
40.0
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
20
100
5
40
50
5
78.8
N/A
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
10
100
10
60
20
10
85.0
N/A
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
12
100
25
42
25
8
85.4
N/A
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
264
99
19
55
19
6
89.6
45.5
214
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
173
99
14
53
26
8
85.7
47.0
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
143
99
24
56
15
5
92.3
47.0
114
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
14
100
14
57
14
14
87.5
N/A
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
316
99
19
54
21
6
88.7
47.0
250
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
331
99
21
54
20
5
89.7
51.0
247
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
49
100
2
14
31
53
51.5
45.5
34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
10
100
0
40
30
30
60.0
N/A
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
47
100
15
17
43
26
66.0
53.5
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
85
100
9
20
33
38
60.6
50.0
59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
19
100
16
26
32
26
67.1
N/A
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
10
100
30
40
20
10
87.5
N/A
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
12
100
33
42
8
17
81.3
N/A
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
268
100
29
33
26
12
82.1
52.0
217
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
173
100
28
34
24
15
80.6
56.0
138
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
146
100
28
33
28
11
81.8
51.5
116
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
14
100
14
29
36
21
66.1
N/A
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
319
100
28
33
26
13
81.2
54.5
254
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
333
99
28
37
24
11
82.0
47.5
248
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
District
State
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Students Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
21
100
0
14
43
43
59.5
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
15
100
0
20
60
20
68.3
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
31
100
0
16
55
29
62.9
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
103
100
16
38
36
11
80.3
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
62
100
19
34
34
13
80.2
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
58
100
12
34
43
10
76.7
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
120
100
16
34
38
12
78.5
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
136
100
15
51
29
4
87.3
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - Hadley
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
One or more schools in the district classified into Level 2
This district’s determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This district’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
55
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
38
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
44
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
56
Did Not Meet Target
School Accountability Information
School
School Type
Title I Status
Accountability and Assistance Level
Hadley Elementary
Elementary School
Title I School (TA)
Level 2
Hopkins Academy
Middle-High School or K-12
Non-Title I School (NT)
Level 2
Hadley: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.4
89.7
88.7
-1.0
94.4
95.2
43
316
25
No Change
High needs
75.7
77.4
70.8
-6.6
85.8
87.9
9
84
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
80.4
80.4
73.4
-7.0
82.0
90.2
9
46
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
65.0
64.2
63.5
-0.7
79.6
82.5
30
50
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
White
91.9
90.6
89.6
-1.0
95.3
96.0
42
264
25
No Change
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
81.9
82.0
81.2
-0.8
89.4
91.0
36
319
25
No Change
High needs
60.0
67.5
60.6
-6.9
76.7
80.0
5
85
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
71.7
71.7
66.0
-5.7
74.1
85.9
13
47
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
50.5
57.2
51.5
-5.7
71.1
75.3
21
49
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
White
84.5
84.1
82.1
-2.0
91.0
92.3
30
268
25
No Change
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
86.6
87.3
78.5
-8.8
92.2
93.3
31
120
0
Declined
High needs
74.4
74.4
62.9
-11.5
85.1
87.2
19
31
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
67.9
-
-
-
-
84.0
-
21
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
White
88.8
89.9
80.3
-9.6
93.5
94.4
30
103
0
Declined
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
20.5
18.7
316
0
4.8
4.4
316
0
High needs
6.8
7.1
84
0
15.5
14.3
84
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
10.1
8.7
46
0
11.6
10.9
46
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
2.0
50
25
27.3
22.0
50
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
White
22.2
19.3
264
0
2.9
4.2
264
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
27.6
27.9
319
0
11.1
11.6
319
0
High needs
12.5
9.4
85
0
25.0
31.8
85
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
14.5
14.9
47
0
17.4
21.3
47
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Students w/ disabilities
6.7
2.0
49
0
40.0
42.9
49
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
White
29.7
28.7
268
0
9.1
10.4
268
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
15.4
15.8
120
0
3.7
10.0
120
0
High needs
0.0
0.0
31
0
9.1
22.6
31
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
White
17.4
15.5
103
0
1.8
8.7
103
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
51.0
47.0
-4.0
51.0
No
250
50
Below Target
High needs
47.0
40.0
-7.0
51.0
No
57
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
53.0
38.0
-15.0
51.0
No
31
25
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
43.5
43.0
-0.5
51.0
No
33
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
White
52.0
45.5
-6.5
51.0
No
214
50
Below Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
47.5
54.5
7.0
51.0
No
254
75
On Target
High needs
40.0
50.0
10.0
51.0
No
59
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
41.0
53.5
12.5
51.0
No
32
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
37.0
45.5
8.5
51.0
No
34
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
9
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
10
-
-
White
49.0
52.0
3.0
51.0
No
217
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
9
-
High needs
-
60.0
9
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
9
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.5
95.5
0.0
80.0
90.0
44
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
12
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
100.0
94.9
-5.1
80.0
90.0
39
75
On Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.6
95.5
-2.1
85.0
95.0
44
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
10
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
5
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
100.0
100.0
0.0
85.0
95.0
39
100
Above Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
1.0
0.6
1.7
-1.1
0.6
0.5
34
179
0
Declined
High needs
4.8
2.6
3.6
-1.0
2.8
2.4
32
28
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
0.6
0.7
1.3
-0.6
0.4
0.3
39
152
0
Declined
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
320
317
99
Yes
320
320
100
Yes
123
123
100
Yes
High needs
86
85
99
Yes
86
86
100
Yes
33
33
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
47
46
98
Yes
47
47
100
Yes
17
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
11
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
50
50
100
Yes
49
49
100
Yes
21
21
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
21
-
-
-
20
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
12
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
White
267
264
99
Yes
268
268
100
Yes
104
104
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.