Diman Regional Vocational Technical High (08210605)
Andrew Rebello, Principal Mailing Address: 251 Stonehaven Rd Fall River, MA 02723
Phone: (508) 678-2891 FAX: (508) 679-6423 Website: http://www.dimanregional.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
34
97
0
44
50
6
77.9
N/A
N/A
34
97
0
44
50
6
77.9
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
132
99
29
52
17
2
92.8
N/A
N/A
132
99
29
52
17
2
92.8
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
148
98
26
51
22
2
91.0
N/A
N/A
148
98
26
51
22
2
91.0
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
28
97
18
54
25
4
86.6
N/A
N/A
28
97
18
54
25
4
86.6
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
15
100
40
47
13
0
95.0
N/A
N/A
15
100
40
47
13
0
95.0
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
268
99
33
52
14
1
94.5
N/A
N/A
268
99
33
52
14
1
94.5
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
170
99
31
54
14
1
94.1
N/A
N/A
170
99
31
54
14
1
94.1
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
152
99
32
51
16
1
93.6
N/A
N/A
152
99
32
51
16
1
93.6
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
21
100
14
57
24
5
86.9
N/A
N/A
21
100
14
57
24
5
86.9
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
322
99
32
52
15
1
93.9
N/A
N/A
322
99
32
52
15
1
93.9
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
330
100
23
57
16
3
92.7
N/A
N/A
330
100
23
57
16
3
92.7
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Diman Regional Vocational Technical High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
54
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
84
Met Target
High needs
79
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
73
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
83
Met Target
Diman Regional Vocational Technical High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
95.0
98.2
98.7
0.5
97.5
97.5
62
335
100
Above Target
High needs
92.4
95.9
97.2
1.3
96.2
96.2
72
154
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
98.8
96.5
97.5
1.0
99.0
99.4
73
138
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
78.0
83.6
91.9
8.3
89.0
89.0
50
34
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
91.3
92.7
93.8
1.1
95.7
95.7
60
28
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
95.3
98.5
99.2
0.7
97.7
97.7
64
280
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.8
91.6
91.7
0.1
95.4
95.4
46
334
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
88.5
85.9
87.5
1.6
94.3
94.3
70
154
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
87.4
88.8
91.1
2.3
89.5
93.7
78
137
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
77.0
63.6
62.9
-0.7
88.5
88.5
22
35
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
86.3
82.6
82.5
-0.1
93.2
93.2
59
30
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.3
92.4
92.3
-0.1
95.7
95.7
31
277
25
No Change
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
88.0
92.7
93.9
1.2
94.0
94.0
58
322
75
On Target
High needs
84.0
86.7
91.0
4.3
92.0
92.0
82
148
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
86.9
88.6
92.8
4.2
89.1
93.5
88
132
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
61.0
65.8
77.9
12.1
80.5
80.5
54
34
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
85.2
91.3
86.6
-4.7
87.7
92.6
78
28
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
88.3
93.6
94.5
0.9
94.2
94.2
52
268
75
On Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
33.1
28.7
335
0
0.3
0.9
335
0
High needs
21.2
23.4
154
25
0.7
1.9
154
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
24.0
26.1
138
0
0.8
2.2
138
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
34
0
3.1
5.9
34
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Hispanic/Latino
16.7
25.0
28
25
0.0
7.1
28
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
33.7
28.2
280
0
0.3
0.4
280
0
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
45.3
42.5
334
0
3.2
3.0
334
0
High needs
34.7
36.4
154
0
7.5
6.5
154
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
39.5
40.9
137
0
4.7
2.9
137
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
2.9
35
25
27.3
25.7
35
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Hispanic/Latino
26.1
20.0
30
0
8.7
10.0
30
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
47.1
45.1
277
0
2.7
2.5
277
0
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
23.3
31.7
322
25
3.0
1.2
322
25
High needs
18.0
25.7
148
25
6.5
2.0
148
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
19.5
28.8
132
25
5.7
2.3
132
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Students w/ disabilities
3.3
0.0
34
0
23.3
5.9
34
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Hispanic/Latino
10.0
17.9
28
25
5.0
3.6
28
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
24.4
33.2
268
25
2.1
1.1
268
25
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
47.0
48.0
1.0
51.0
Yes
294
75
On Target
High needs
45.0
50.0
5.0
51.0
Yes
139
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
45.0
48.5
3.5
51.0
Yes
126
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
34.0
62.5
28.5
51.0
Yes
28
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
45.0
43.0
-2.0
51.0
Yes
27
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
47.0
50.0
3.0
51.0
Yes
242
75
On Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
51.0
55.0
4.0
51.0
No
291
75
On Target
High needs
46.0
55.0
9.0
51.0
Yes
137
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
45.0
56.0
11.0
51.0
Yes
125
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
70.5
61.0
-9.5
51.0
No
27
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
39.0
55.0
16.0
51.0
No
27
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
51.0
55.0
4.0
51.0
No
239
75
On Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
19
-
High needs
-
60.0
19
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
19
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
96.3
97.0
0.7
80.0
90.0
337
100
Above Target
High needs
96.2
96.0
-0.2
80.0
90.0
201
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
88.5
88.9
0.4
80.0
90.0
45
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
9
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
9
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
13
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
White
95.8
97.2
1.4
80.0
90.0
285
100
Above Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.9
96.6
-1.3
85.0
95.0
349
100
Above Target
High needs
97.1
96.6
-0.5
85.0
95.0
235
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
4
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
100.0
90.4
-9.6
85.0
95.0
52
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
11
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
6
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
97.9
96.2
-1.7
85.0
95.0
312
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.5
0.5
73
1407
75
On Target
High needs
1.3
1.0
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.7
81
534
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.4
77
447
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
3.5
2.0
1.4
0.6
1.8
1.8
60
140
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
0.0
1.2
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
86
103
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
67
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
1.1
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.6
0.6
66
1185
75
On Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
339
335
99
Yes
339
334
99
Yes
339
336
99
Yes
High needs
158
154
97
Yes
158
154
97
Yes
158
155
98
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
140
138
99
Yes
140
137
98
Yes
140
138
99
Yes
EL and Former EL
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
36
34
96
Yes
36
35
97
Yes
36
35
97
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Asian
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
31
28
95
Yes
31
30
97
Yes
31
30
97
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
16
-
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
281
280
100
Yes
281
277
99
Yes
281
279
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
Massachusetts 
