2016 Report Card - Helen Y. Davis Leadership Academy Charter Public School
Helen Y. Davis Leadership Academy Charter Public School (04190305)
Sophia Stephney, Principal Mailing Address: 23 Leonard Street Boston, MA 02122
Phone: (617) 474-7950 FAX: (617) 474-7957 Website: http://www.dlacps.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
81.3
81.3
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
68
68
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
94.1
94.1
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
5.9
5.9
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
13.6 to 1
13.6 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
This organization is currently closed.
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
2016 Accountability Data - Helen Y. Davis Leadership Academy Charter Public School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals Low assessment participation (Less than 95%)
Focus on ELL and former ELL -
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements-At Risk (MRAR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
25
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
56
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
53
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
66
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
53
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
-
Helen Y. Davis Leadership Academy Charter Public School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
82.7
87.4
81.0
-6.4
89.9
91.4
16
218
0
Declined
High needs
82.5
85.0
79.2
-5.8
89.8
91.3
43
161
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
87.4
87.4
80.1
-7.3
88.5
93.7
31
133
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
80.6
80.4
78.6
-1.8
87.1
90.3
66
35
25
No Change
Students w/ disabilities
67.1
68.9
70.1
1.2
80.8
83.6
52
51
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
82.4
86.9
81.3
-5.6
89.7
91.2
50
184
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
84.4
88.9
77.7
-11.2
90.9
92.2
35
28
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
61.9
72.2
64.0
-8.2
77.8
81.0
14
215
0
Declined
High needs
61.4
70.8
61.6
-9.2
77.5
80.7
43
158
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
72.9
72.9
63.1
-9.8
75.2
86.5
30
130
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
72.1
77.7
64.3
-13.4
81.4
86.1
65
35
0
Declined
Students w/ disabilities
47.9
46.2
48.5
2.3
69.6
74.0
46
50
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
61.5
71.3
64.2
-7.1
77.5
80.8
56
181
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
63.3
75.0
62.5
-12.5
78.6
81.7
40
28
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
61.2
57.4
40.2
-17.2
77.4
80.6
4
74
0
Declined
High needs
61.5
56.0
38.9
-17.1
77.5
80.8
4
52
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
56.3
56.3
38.7
-17.6
59.9
78.2
5
42
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
59.9
56.3
40.6
-15.7
76.6
80.0
11
61
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
4.1
3.2
218
0
2.7
10.1
218
0
High needs
5.6
2.5
161
0
3.5
13.0
161
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
6.0
2.3
133
0
1.7
12.0
133
0
EL and Former EL
3.6
2.9
35
0
3.6
8.6
35
0
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
51
0
9.1
25.5
51
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2.3
3.3
184
25
3.4
10.9
184
0
Hispanic/Latino
11.1
3.6
28
0
0.0
7.1
28
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
7.3
6.0
215
0
18.2
26.0
215
0
High needs
7.0
4.4
158
0
18.2
28.5
158
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
6.0
3.8
130
0
15.4
26.9
130
0
EL and Former EL
14.3
5.7
35
0
3.6
25.7
35
0
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
4.0
50
25
48.5
46.0
50
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
6.3
5.5
181
0
18.8
24.9
181
0
Hispanic/Latino
8.1
10.7
28
25
16.2
32.1
28
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
0.0
0.0
74
0
28.2
59.5
74
0
High needs
0.0
0.0
52
0
31.0
59.6
52
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
0.0
0.0
42
0
30.6
54.8
42
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
0.0
0.0
61
0
32.1
57.4
61
0
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
53.5
42.0
-11.5
51.0
No
190
50
Below Target
High needs
54.0
42.0
-12.0
51.0
No
137
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
51.0
42.0
-9.0
51.0
No
113
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
55.0
47.0
-8.0
51.0
No
31
50
Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
65.0
42.0
-23.0
51.0
Yes
42
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
52.0
43.5
-8.5
51.0
No
156
50
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
57.0
30.0
-27.0
51.0
No
28
0
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
63.0
47.0
-16.0
51.0
No
188
50
Below Target
High needs
65.5
49.0
-16.5
51.0
No
136
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
65.5
47.5
-18.0
51.0
No
112
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
83.0
59.0
-24.0
51.0
No
31
75
On Target
Students w/ disabilities
52.0
59.5
7.5
51.0
Yes
42
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
63.0
48.0
-15.0
51.0
No
154
50
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
58.0
43.5
-14.5
51.0
No
28
50
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
White
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
17
-
High needs
-
60.0
17
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
17
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
218
216
99
Yes
216
215
100
Yes
75
74
99
Yes
High needs
161
159
99
Yes
159
158
99
Yes
52
52
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
133
131
98
Yes
131
130
99
Yes
42
42
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
35
33
94
No
35
35
100
Yes
6
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
51
51
100
Yes
51
50
98
Yes
17
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
184
183
99
Yes
182
181
99
Yes
62
61
98
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
28
27
96
Yes
28
28
100
Yes
11
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.