Juliette A Miller, Principal Mailing Address: 232 Pearl Street Stoughton, MA 02072-2397
Phone: (781) 344-7001 FAX: (781) 341-6041 Website: http://www.stoughtonschools.org
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
35
100
3
29
63
6
74.3
N/A
N/A
147
99
2
16
46
37
54.9
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
53
100
2
11
47
40
48.6
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
56
100
29
48
18
5
90.2
N/A
N/A
259
99
10
26
41
22
67.7
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
83
100
20
41
33
6
83.7
N/A
N/A
366
99
8
24
43
24
64.9
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
62
100
24
48
23
5
89.1
N/A
N/A
199
100
10
25
42
23
65.5
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
11
100
64
27
9
0
95.5
N/A
N/A
53
100
23
36
38
4
82.1
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
13
100
31
46
8
15
84.6
N/A
N/A
68
100
13
28
38
21
68.4
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
100
23
27
32
18
73.9
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
170
100
42
42
15
1
93.8
N/A
N/A
537
99
19
40
32
9
81.2
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
135
100
30
41
26
3
88.1
N/A
N/A
473
99
15
34
38
13
76.0
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
122
100
48
45
6
2
96.9
N/A
N/A
410
100
18
36
32
13
77.1
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
100
0
5
21
74
31.6
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
35
100
26
46
20
9
84.3
N/A
N/A
119
99
11
29
40
20
67.6
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
257
100
39
43
16
2
92.3
N/A
N/A
883
99
16
35
35
13
76.5
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
230
100
39
45
14
3
93.3
N/A
N/A
809
100
17
33
37
12
77.7
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Stoughton High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
47
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
80
Met Target
High needs
63
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
60
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
65
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
82
Met Target
Stoughton High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.1
98.5
97.8
-0.7
98.6
98.6
43
269
100
Above Target
High needs
93.9
96.3
94.4
-1.9
97.0
97.0
44
89
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
97.5
98.4
96.3
-2.1
97.9
98.8
57
61
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
88.6
90.9
87.9
-3.0
94.3
94.3
30
35
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
95.5
97.2
97.0
-0.2
97.8
97.8
63
66
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
97.7
98.6
98.6
0.0
98.9
98.9
46
173
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.6
91.0
91.6
0.6
94.8
94.8
44
269
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
80.7
80.4
80.9
0.5
90.4
90.4
38
89
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
89.8
85.5
89.3
3.8
91.5
94.9
73
61
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
70.9
58.3
62.9
4.6
85.5
85.5
22
35
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
82.5
87.2
87.5
0.3
91.3
91.3
71
66
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92.4
91.9
93.5
1.6
96.2
96.2
41
173
50
Improved Below Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.0
93.3
92.3
-1.0
95.5
95.5
49
257
25
No Change
High needs
83.8
85.9
83.7
-2.2
91.9
91.9
51
83
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
93.1
88.6
90.2
1.6
94.3
96.6
77
56
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
77.8
70.2
74.3
4.1
88.9
88.9
42
35
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
86.1
91.1
89.1
-2.0
93.1
93.1
88
62
25
No Change
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
92.9
93.5
93.8
0.3
96.5
96.5
47
170
50
Improved Below Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
42.4
49.8
269
25
0.4
1.1
269
0
High needs
23.6
30.3
89
25
1.1
3.4
89
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
33.3
42.6
61
25
0.0
3.3
61
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Students w/ disabilities
3.0
5.7
35
25
3.0
5.7
35
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Afr. Amer./Black
37.8
36.4
66
0
2.2
0.0
66
25
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
42.8
53.8
173
25
0.0
0.6
173
0
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
57.1
53.2
269
0
7.1
5.9
269
25
High needs
30.7
33.7
89
0
17.0
16.9
89
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
40.3
44.3
61
0
12.9
8.2
61
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Students w/ disabilities
6.1
5.7
35
0
45.5
37.1
35
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Afr. Amer./Black
35.6
30.3
66
0
8.9
9.1
66
0
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
63.5
61.8
173
0
6.6
4.6
173
25
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
38.7
38.5
257
0
2.2
1.6
257
25
High needs
18.8
20.5
83
0
5.9
3.6
83
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
25.4
28.6
56
25
5.1
3.6
56
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
2.9
35
25
16.1
0.0
35
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Afr. Amer./Black
23.8
24.2
62
0
2.4
3.2
62
0
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
42.9
42.4
170
0
2.5
0.0
170
25
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
53.0
54.0
1.0
51.0
No
242
75
On Target
High needs
60.0
52.5
-7.5
51.0
No
74
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
61.0
58.0
-3.0
51.0
No
50
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
46.0
48.5
2.5
51.0
No
26
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
50.0
47.0
-3.0
51.0
No
57
50
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
51.5
59.0
7.5
51.0
Yes
159
75
On Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
48.5
44.0
-4.5
51.0
No
238
50
Below Target
High needs
52.0
38.0
-14.0
51.0
No
71
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
62.0
35.0
-27.0
51.0
Yes
49
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
18.0
43.0
25.0
51.0
No
24
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
42.5
46.0
3.5
51.0
No
55
50
Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
49.0
44.0
-5.0
51.0
Yes
157
75
On Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
12
-
High needs
-
60.0
12
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
12
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.1
92.9
-1.2
80.0
90.0
253
75
On Target
High needs
89.0
88.3
-0.7
80.0
90.0
128
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
6
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
85.7
83.3
-2.4
80.0
90.0
42
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
84.6
96.1
11.5
80.0
90.0
51
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
White
96.2
91.9
-4.3
80.0
90.0
173
75
On Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
92.3
95.9
3.6
85.0
95.0
220
100
Above Target
High needs
84.7
93.0
8.3
85.0
95.0
100
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
19
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
13
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
82.8
87.2
4.4
85.0
95.0
39
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
11
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
White
95.6
97.4
1.8
85.0
95.0
156
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
2.5
1.5
1.4
0.1
1.3
1.3
44
1039
25
No Change
High needs
3.1
3.3
3.0
0.3
1.6
1.6
37
328
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
4.5
4.5
4.3
0.2
4.1
2.3
27
211
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.4
4.6
2.3
2.3
1.2
1.2
43
130
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1.5
2.0
1.4
0.6
0.8
0.8
44
214
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
60
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
2.6
1.4
1.3
0.1
1.3
1.3
35
710
75
On Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
280
278
99
Yes
280
279
100
Yes
280
280
100
Yes
High needs
97
95
98
Yes
96
95
99
Yes
96
96
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
69
67
97
Yes
68
67
99
Yes
68
68
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
11
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
38
37
97
Yes
38
37
97
Yes
38
38
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
13
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
73
72
99
Yes
72
72
100
Yes
72
72
100
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
176
175
99
Yes
177
176
99
Yes
177
177
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.