Lisa Sleboda, Principal Mailing Address: 225 High Street Randolph, MA 02368
Phone: (781) 961-6243 FAX: (781) 961-6286 Website: http://www.randolph.k12.ma.us
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
98.3
99.2
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
330
973
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
11.2 to 1
11.5 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.8
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
2016 Accountability Data - Randolph Community Middle
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 3
Among lowest performing 20% of schools and subgroups
Focus on Students w/disabilities -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
16
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
55
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
55
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
59
Did Not Meet Target
Students w/ disabilities
42
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
75
Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black
53
Did Not Meet Target
Hispanic/Latino
55
Did Not Meet Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
54
Did Not Meet Target
Randolph Community Middle: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
84.0
77.2
80.8
3.6
90.7
92.0
16
633
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
80.0
68.5
73.0
4.5
88.3
90.0
17
369
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
70.9
70.9
75.8
4.9
73.3
85.5
18
258
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
61.3
63.3
65.9
2.6
77.4
80.7
35
74
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
62.0
50.8
61.3
10.5
77.8
81.0
26
157
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
93.6
91.9
93.5
1.6
96.3
96.8
29
100
50
Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
80.6
72.0
76.6
4.6
88.7
90.3
30
332
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
77.5
76.1
80.5
4.4
86.9
88.8
44
86
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
87.5
80.8
81.7
0.9
92.7
93.8
7
90
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
64.3
59.5
62.1
2.6
79.2
82.2
11
630
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
58.6
50.4
52.5
2.1
75.9
79.3
7
368
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
52.0
52.0
54.7
2.7
56.0
76.0
7
257
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
47.6
47.3
49.7
2.4
69.4
73.8
32
74
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
37.7
37.2
40.9
3.7
63.7
68.9
18
156
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
84.8
85.7
86.3
0.6
91.1
92.4
23
100
50
Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
57.1
51.3
54.9
3.6
75.0
78.6
26
329
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
56.7
57.5
59.3
1.8
74.7
78.4
26
86
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
71.0
66.7
65.3
-1.4
83.1
85.5
6
90
25
No Change
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
59.3
63.2
57.8
-5.4
76.3
79.7
15
199
0
Declined
High needs
53.5
55.5
49.6
-5.9
72.9
76.8
12
112
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
59.9
59.9
52.4
-7.5
63.2
80.0
19
73
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
56.0
-
-
-
-
78.0
-
20
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
39.1
44.9
38.6
-6.3
64.5
69.6
14
44
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
78.8
-
86.1
15.3
87.6
89.4
40
27
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
48.7
55.8
48.5
-7.3
70.1
74.4
31
120
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
51.7
65.4
57.0
-8.4
71.8
75.9
54
25
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
72.6
68.0
78.6
10.6
84.0
86.3
53
21
50
Improved Below Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
5.5
7.6
633
25
15.1
10.7
633
25
High needs
3.4
3.5
369
0
22.9
16.5
369
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
3.9
5.0
258
25
21.0
15.1
258
25
EL and Former EL
2.7
0.0
74
0
28.0
25.7
74
0
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
157
0
42.6
27.4
157
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
16.7
20.0
100
25
2.1
3.0
100
0
Afr. Amer./Black
3.3
5.4
332
25
18.7
13.6
332
25
Hispanic/Latino
2.3
2.3
86
0
17.0
9.3
86
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
3.8
7.8
90
25
15.4
11.1
90
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
10.8
11.3
630
0
35.3
32.9
630
0
High needs
6.5
5.2
368
0
46.3
45.7
368
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
7.5
6.6
257
0
42.7
44.7
257
0
EL and Former EL
5.3
4.1
74
0
48.0
48.6
74
0
Students w/ disabilities
0.6
0.0
156
0
69.0
63.5
156
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
36.5
33.0
100
0
6.3
9.0
100
0
Afr. Amer./Black
5.0
5.5
329
25
46.1
42.2
329
0
Hispanic/Latino
4.6
8.1
86
25
35.6
33.7
86
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
12.8
12.2
90
0
24.4
25.6
90
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
1.9
1.0
199
0
21.3
35.7
199
0
High needs
0.8
0.0
112
0
31.1
50.9
112
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
1.1
0.0
73
0
22.7
46.6
73
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
44
0
51.0
72.7
44
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2.8
3.7
27
25
16.7
3.7
27
25
Afr. Amer./Black
0.0
0.0
120
0
27.5
45.8
120
0
Hispanic/Latino
0.0
0.0
25
0
23.1
36.0
25
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
White
0.0
4.8
21
25
16.0
14.3
21
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
39.0
55.0
16.0
51.0
Yes
595
100
Above Target
High needs
38.0
54.0
16.0
51.0
No
333
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
37.0
55.5
18.5
51.0
No
240
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
41.0
55.0
14.0
51.0
No
64
75
On Target
Students w/ disabilities
26.5
48.5
22.0
51.0
No
134
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
47.0
65.0
18.0
51.0
Yes
99
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
36.0
50.5
14.5
51.0
Yes
304
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
42.5
55.0
12.5
51.0
No
81
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
22
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
White
44.0
55.0
11.0
51.0
No
87
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
36.0
47.0
11.0
51.0
No
589
75
On Target
High needs
33.5
46.0
12.5
51.0
No
329
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
33.0
42.0
9.0
51.0
No
238
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
36.0
53.5
17.5
51.0
No
66
100
Above Target
Students w/ disabilities
28.0
42.5
14.5
51.0
No
128
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
36.0
51.0
15.0
51.0
Yes
99
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
36.5
46.0
9.5
51.0
No
301
75
On Target
Hispanic/Latino
37.0
48.0
11.0
51.0
No
80
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
22
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
White
32.5
45.0
12.5
51.0
No
85
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
56.0
60.0
42
0
High needs
56.0
60.0
42
0
EL and Former EL
56.0
60.0
42
0
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
668
663
99
Yes
673
668
99
Yes
212
210
99
Yes
High needs
398
393
99
Yes
403
400
99
Yes
124
122
98
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
281
279
99
Yes
285
282
99
Yes
81
80
99
Yes
EL and Former EL
92
89
97
Yes
95
95
100
Yes
26
26
100
Yes
Students w/ disabilities
159
157
99
Yes
159
157
99
Yes
47
45
96
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
110
108
98
Yes
110
110
100
Yes
30
30
100
Yes
Afr. Amer./Black
351
349
99
Yes
355
351
99
Yes
129
127
98
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
89
89
100
Yes
90
90
100
Yes
25
25
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
23
-
-
-
23
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
White
92
91
99
Yes
92
91
99
Yes
22
22
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
