Brenda C Darling, Principal Mailing Address: 45 Amherst Rd Pelham, MA 01002
Phone: (413) 362-1100 FAX: (413) 253-4108 Website: http://arps.org/pe Organization Description: Pelham District - Pelham Elementary School -Principal Micki Darling
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
53
53
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
11.0 to 1
11.0 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
5
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
14
100
50
36
7
7
0
96.4
--
--
14
100
50
36
7
7
0
96.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
6
--
--
6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
12
100
42
42
8
0
8
93.8
--
--
12
100
42
42
8
0
8
93.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
13
100
62
38
0
0
0
100.0
--
--
13
100
62
38
0
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
14
100
50
36
7
7
0
96.4
--
--
14
100
50
36
7
7
0
96.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
18
100
44
33
6
11
6
90.3
--
--
18
100
44
33
6
11
6
90.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
7
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
--
4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
5
--
--
5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
--
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
14
100
57
36
7
0
0
100.0
--
--
14
100
57
36
7
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
6
--
--
6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
12
100
42
42
8
0
8
93.8
--
--
12
100
42
42
8
0
8
93.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
13
100
62
31
8
0
0
100.0
--
--
13
100
62
31
8
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
14
100
57
36
7
0
0
100.0
--
--
14
100
57
36
7
0
0
100.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
18
100
50
33
11
0
6
95.8
--
--
18
100
50
33
11
0
6
95.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
6
--
5
6
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
2
3
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
4
--
4
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
10
100
20
60
20
0
0
87.5
--
10
10
100
20
60
20
0
0
87.5
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
6
--
6
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
7
--
6
7
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
9
--
8
9
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
10
100
20
60
20
0
0
90.0
--
10
10
100
20
60
20
0
0
90.0
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
13
100
23
54
23
0
0
88.5
--
12
13
100
23
54
23
0
0
88.5
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
6
--
4
6
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
1
3
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
4
--
3
4
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
10
100
10
80
0
0
10
92.5
--
9
10
100
10
80
0
0
10
92.5
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
6
--
6
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
7
--
5
7
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
9
--
8
9
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
10
100
10
80
0
0
10
92.5
--
10
10
100
10
80
0
0
10
92.5
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
13
100
15
62
8
0
15
86.5
--
11
13
100
15
62
8
0
15
86.5
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
100
--
8
9
100
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
3
4
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
--
1
2
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
--
--
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
16
100
6
56
38
0
0
93.8
--
15
16
100
6
56
38
0
0
93.8
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
14
100
0
71
29
0
0
96.4
--
12
14
100
0
71
29
0
0
96.4
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
5
--
5
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
12
100
8
83
8
0
0
100.0
--
10
12
100
8
83
8
0
0
100.0
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
15
100
7
67
27
0
0
95.3
--
14
15
100
7
67
27
0
0
95.3
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
19
100
5
63
32
0
0
93.8
--
17
19
100
5
63
32
0
0
93.8
--
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
100
--
8
9
100
--
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
3
4
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
--
1
2
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
--
--
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
16
100
13
56
19
13
0
90.6
--
15
16
100
13
56
19
13
0
90.6
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
14
100
7
64
14
14
0
91.1
--
12
14
100
7
64
14
14
0
91.1
--
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
5
--
5
5
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
12
100
17
67
17
0
0
97.9
--
10
12
100
17
67
17
0
0
97.9
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
15
100
13
60
27
0
0
90.6
--
14
15
100
13
60
27
0
0
90.6
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
19
100
11
58
21
11
0
87.5
--
17
19
100
11
58
21
11
0
87.5
--
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
4
--
3
4
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
4
--
3
4
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
2
--
1
2
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
6
--
6
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
5
--
4
5
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
10
92
40
30
30
0
0
90.9
--
9
10
92
40
30
30
0
0
90.9
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
11
92
36
36
27
0
0
91.7
--
10
11
92
36
36
27
0
0
91.7
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
17
94
18
59
24
0
0
98.5
--
15
17
94
18
59
24
0
0
98.5
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 6 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
3
--
3
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
3
--
3
3
--
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
6
--
6
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
4
--
4
4
--
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
7
--
7
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
9
83
--
9
9
83
--
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
10
85
40
20
30
10
0
90.9
--
10
10
85
40
20
30
10
0
90.9
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
18
100
39
50
11
0
0
98.6
--
16
18
100
39
50
11
0
0
98.6
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
26
100
8
38
42
8
4
82.1
--
16
26
100
8
38
42
8
4
82.1
--
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
12
100
17
42
25
8
8
81.3
--
6
12
100
17
42
25
8
8
81.3
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
20
100
0
30
55
10
5
77.3
--
14
20
100
0
30
55
10
5
77.3
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
--
2
3
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
--
2
5
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
2
5
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
47
98
28
49
21
2
0
93.8
54.0
32
47
98
28
49
21
2
0
93.8
54.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
32
100
22
53
19
6
0
93.2
55.0
24
32
100
22
53
19
6
0
93.2
55.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
29
97
31
41
24
0
3
89.2
--
15
29
97
31
41
24
0
3
89.2
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
41
98
39
56
5
0
0
98.8
50.0
25
41
98
39
56
5
0
0
98.8
50.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
49
98
29
49
20
2
0
93.6
50.0
33
49
98
29
49
20
2
0
93.6
50.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
61
98
26
48
21
3
2
91.3
52.0
39
61
98
26
48
21
3
2
91.3
52.0
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
59
98
25
59
14
0
2
95.2
62.0
42
59
98
25
59
14
0
2
95.2
62.0
42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
25
96
12
44
24
12
8
81.5
--
15
25
96
12
44
24
12
8
81.5
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
12
100
17
25
25
17
17
77.1
--
5
12
100
17
25
25
17
17
77.1
--
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
19
95
5
42
26
16
11
77.4
--
13
19
95
5
42
26
16
11
77.4
--
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
--
2
3
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
1
--
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
4
--
2
4
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
2
5
--
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
47
98
30
49
15
4
2
94.3
55.0
31
47
98
30
49
15
4
2
94.3
55.0
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
32
100
25
50
16
6
3
92.4
50.0
24
32
100
25
50
16
6
3
92.4
50.0
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
28
94
32
39
18
4
7
87.9
--
14
28
94
32
39
18
4
7
87.9
--
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
41
98
39
46
12
0
2
97.0
53.0
25
41
98
39
46
12
0
2
97.0
53.0
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
48
96
31
50
15
2
2
93.5
53.0
33
48
96
31
50
15
2
2
93.5
53.0
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
60
97
28
45
17
5
5
90.3
53.0
38
60
97
28
45
17
5
5
90.3
53.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
60
100
25
53
20
2
0
92.9
65.0
44
60
100
25
53
20
2
0
92.9
65.0
44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Pelham Elementary
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
2016 Level held harmless
This school's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets Requirements (MR)
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
82
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
71
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
93
Met Target
Pelham Elementary: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.5
95.2
91.3
-3.9
93.9
94.8
76
63
0
Declined
High needs
81.5
-
82.1
4.8
89.2
90.8
79
28
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
89.3
94.1
93.8
-0.3
93.8
94.7
84
48
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.0
92.9
90.3
-2.6
93.6
94.5
72
62
0
Declined
High needs
82.4
-
81.5
-1.8
89.7
91.2
73
27
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
90.3
93.6
94.3
0.7
94.3
95.2
87
48
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.3
-
-
-
-
94.7
-
20
-
-
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
29.0
33.3
63
25
1.6
1.6
63
0
High needs
0.0
10.7
28
25
9.4
3.6
28
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
27.7
37.5
48
25
2.1
0.0
48
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
52.4
51.6
62
0
1.6
6.5
62
0
High needs
15.2
18.5
27
25
3.0
11.1
27
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
51.1
54.2
48
0
2.1
2.1
48
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
High needs
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
62.0
52.0
-10.0
51.0
No
39
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
14
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
65.0
53.5
-11.5
51.0
No
32
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
64.5
52.5
-12.0
51.0
No
38
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
13
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
62.0
55.0
-7.0
51.0
Yes
31
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
-
-
High needs
-
60.0
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
-
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
64
63
98
Yes
64
62
97
Yes
20
20
100
Yes
High needs
28
28
100
Yes
28
27
96
Yes
10
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
12
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
22
-
-
-
22
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
49
48
98
Yes
49
48
98
Yes
16
-
-
-
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.