Hugh Galligan, Principal Mailing Address: 245 Nichols Street PO Box 67 Norwood, MA 02062-0067
Phone: (781) 769-2333 FAX: (781) 762-0826 Website: http://https://www.norwood.k12.ma.us/nhs Organization Description: Senior High School
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
33
98
12
39
39
9
76.5
N/A
N/A
145
96
6
21
43
30
62.9
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
11
100
9
45
27
18
72.7
N/A
N/A
47
100
6
21
40
32
60.1
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
51
100
24
55
20
2
90.2
N/A
N/A
176
98
9
36
39
16
74.0
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
77
99
19
48
26
6
84.7
N/A
N/A
287
98
8
31
39
22
69.9
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
18
100
17
56
22
6
84.7
N/A
N/A
67
100
7
33
39
21
69.0
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42
100
40
33
24
2
89.9
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
15
100
13
33
40
13
73.3
N/A
N/A
65
100
6
22
46
26
63.1
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
90
21
32
42
5
77.6
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
155
99
46
46
7
1
96.6
N/A
N/A
521
99
23
41
29
8
84.4
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
103
98
45
40
12
4
92.2
N/A
N/A
362
97
21
35
32
12
79.9
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
99
100
38
51
10
1
95.7
N/A
N/A
354
100
21
40
31
9
82.3
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
11
100
9
45
27
18
72.7
N/A
N/A
35
100
6
20
37
37
57.1
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
33
100
36
39
18
6
87.1
N/A
N/A
104
100
19
26
34
21
70.2
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
202
99
42
45
11
2
93.9
N/A
N/A
716
99
21
37
31
10
81.1
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
212
100
33
51
11
5
91.9
N/A
N/A
733
99
17
42
32
9
81.7
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Norwood High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals Low assessment participation (Less than 95%)
Focus on Economically disadvantaged -High needs -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
34
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
64
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
59
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
54
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
80
Met Target
Norwood High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.4
97.4
96.6
-0.8
98.7
98.7
30
220
25
No Change
High needs
92.6
91.9
91.9
0.0
96.3
96.3
26
86
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
93.3
95.6
95.0
-0.6
94.4
96.7
44
55
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
87.5
91.2
89.5
-1.7
93.8
93.8
38
38
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
96.3
96.6
92.4
-4.2
98.2
98.2
34
23
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
97.6
98.5
98.4
-0.1
98.8
98.8
42
160
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
92.2
92.3
90.0
-2.3
96.1
96.1
33
219
25
No Change
High needs
82.9
79.6
77.6
-2.0
91.5
91.5
26
85
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
82.1
86.3
80.5
-5.8
85.1
91.1
29
55
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
75.0
69.7
68.9
-0.8
87.5
87.5
35
37
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
81.3
81.8
70.7
-11.1
90.7
90.7
13
23
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
94.0
94.6
94.7
0.1
97.0
97.0
53
159
50
Improved Below Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
86.8
91.9
93.9
2.0
93.4
93.4
58
202
75
On Target
High needs
73.9
79.2
84.7
5.5
87.0
87.0
60
77
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
86.3
89.1
90.2
1.1
88.6
93.2
77
51
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
58.3
68.8
76.5
7.7
79.2
79.2
49
33
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
88.7
94.6
96.6
2.0
94.4
94.4
72
155
100
Above Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
48.6
44.1
220
0
1.4
1.4
220
0
High needs
27.9
25.6
86
0
4.4
3.5
86
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
40.0
30.9
55
0
2.5
0.0
55
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Students w/ disabilities
8.1
10.5
38
25
2.7
2.6
38
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Afr. Amer./Black
31.8
34.8
23
0
0.0
0.0
23
25
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
53.0
47.5
160
0
0.0
0.6
160
0
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
62.3
57.1
219
0
5.0
7.8
219
0
High needs
32.4
32.9
85
0
15.5
18.8
85
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
42.9
40.0
55
0
11.9
14.5
55
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Students w/ disabilities
15.8
18.9
37
25
21.1
29.7
37
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Afr. Amer./Black
40.9
21.7
23
0
13.6
21.7
23
0
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
67.6
65.4
159
0
3.5
3.1
159
25
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
32.5
41.6
202
25
5.2
2.5
202
25
High needs
13.6
19.5
77
25
15.2
6.5
77
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
20.5
23.5
51
25
5.1
2.0
51
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.8
12.1
33
25
22.2
9.1
33
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
36.1
45.8
155
25
2.4
1.3
155
25
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
44.0
35.0
-9.0
51.0
No
192
25
Below Target
High needs
46.0
25.0
-21.0
51.0
No
71
0
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
48.5
38.0
-10.5
51.0
No
46
25
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
40.0
13.5
-26.5
51.0
No
34
0
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
21
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
41.0
40.0
-1.0
51.0
Yes
144
75
On Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
54.0
43.0
-11.0
51.0
No
192
50
Below Target
High needs
47.5
35.5
-12.0
51.0
No
70
25
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
55.0
36.5
-18.5
51.0
No
46
25
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
32.0
34.0
2.0
51.0
Yes
33
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
21
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
54.0
45.0
-9.0
51.0
No
143
50
Below Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
17
-
High needs
-
60.0
17
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
17
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.0
93.8
0.8
80.0
90.0
273
75
On Target
High needs
85.6
90.4
4.8
80.0
90.0
146
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
10
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
83.0
87.1
4.1
80.0
90.0
62
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
16
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
75.8
97.1
21.3
80.0
90.0
34
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
White
97.2
94.6
-2.6
80.0
90.0
204
75
On Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.1
94.8
1.7
85.0
95.0
271
75
On Target
High needs
88.6
89.6
1.0
85.0
95.0
125
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
84.5
89.4
4.9
85.0
95.0
47
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
12
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
33
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
93.9
97.7
3.8
85.0
95.0
213
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
1.5
0.6
0.8
-0.2
0.8
0.8
58
967
75
On Target
High needs
3.2
1.3
2.1
-0.8
1.6
1.6
52
326
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
1.6
1.6
2.7
-1.1
1.5
0.8
46
187
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
1.5
1.4
3.2
-1.8
0.8
0.8
32
155
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
44
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
1.4
0.0
0.9
-0.9
0.7
0.7
53
113
0
Declined
Hispanic/Latino
1.9
3.1
5.8
-2.7
1.0
1.0
21
69
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
1.6
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.8
0.8
73
723
75
On Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
231
224
97
Yes
231
229
99
Yes
231
229
99
Yes
High needs
95
89
94
No
95
94
99
Yes
95
94
99
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
62
58
94
No
62
62
100
Yes
62
62
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
17
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
41
41
100
Yes
41
40
98
Yes
41
40
98
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
25
25
100
Yes
25
25
100
Yes
25
25
100
Yes
Hispanic/Latino
28
28
100
Yes
28
28
100
Yes
28
28
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
164
159
97
Yes
164
162
99
Yes
164
162
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.