John M Harrington, Principal Mailing Address: 56 King Street Littleton, MA 01460-4486
Phone: (978) 952-2555 FAX: (978) 486-0758 Website: http://www.littletonps.org/highschool/
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
131
558
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
13.6 to 1
14.3 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
16
100
19
63
19
0
92.2
N/A
16
191
98
2
42
38
18
74.2
45.0
149
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
100
8
46
31
15
76.9
N/A
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
78
100
6
44
36
14
78.2
34.0
60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
18
100
28
56
17
0
93.1
N/A
18
236
99
4
45
36
15
77.3
45.0
180
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
100
20
30
30
20
85.0
N/A
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
100
26
65
7
2
97.7
63.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
95
21
37
32
11
81.6
N/A
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
100
17
54
21
8
86.5
N/A
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
96
99
70
27
3
0
99.0
56.0
91
740
99
21
59
16
4
92.1
52.0
615
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
53
98
53
40
8
0
97.2
49.5
50
405
99
14
60
21
5
89.4
47.0
321
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
51
100
84
16
0
0
100.0
64.0
49
438
99
29
57
11
3
94.0
55.0
363
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
100
26
48
17
9
87.0
N/A
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
104
99
68
28
4
0
98.6
56.0
99
843
99
21
58
16
4
91.8
51.0
684
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
120
99
67
33
0
1
99.4
52.5
116
848
99
23
57
15
5
91.5
44.0
688
216,396
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
175,934
ALL GRADES - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
16
94
38
44
19
0
93.8
N/A
16
189
97
10
29
34
28
68.1
53.0
149
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
93
31
38
23
8
84.6
N/A
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
79
100
14
23
41
23
71.2
42.0
59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
High needs
18
95
44
39
17
0
94.4
N/A
18
235
98
14
29
34
23
71.3
50.0
180
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
100
27
27
27
18
84.1
N/A
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
47
40
9
5
95.9
51.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
95
16
21
26
37
63.2
N/A
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
100
29
33
33
4
89.6
N/A
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
96
98
83
15
2
0
99.2
69.0
91
739
99
40
34
20
6
88.5
55.0
619
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
53
96
79
15
6
0
98.1
68.0
50
406
99
38
33
19
10
87.0
55.0
323
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
51
100
84
16
0
0
100.0
74.0
49
439
99
40
35
20
5
89.2
57.0
366
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
96
48
30
17
4
90.2
N/A
13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
104
98
82
15
3
0
99.0
70.0
99
845
99
39
34
20
7
88.1
56.0
689
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
120
99
78
18
3
2
97.5
63.0
116
853
99
39
34
19
8
87.5
53.0
693
216,363
99
-
-
-
-
-
50.0
176,568
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
16
100
25
44
25
6
85.9
N/A
N/A
83
97
6
20
53
20
66.3
N/A
N/A
38,109
98
3
18
41
38
59.7
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,594
99
3
16
43
39
54.1
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32
100
6
22
50
22
70.3
N/A
N/A
61,476
98
6
26
43
25
65.8
N/A
N/A
High needs
18
100
28
44
22
6
87.5
N/A
N/A
100
97
7
23
51
19
68.5
N/A
N/A
89,857
98
6
25
43
26
65.4
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,761
99
5
24
44
27
63.9
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
422
98
9
33
40
19
71.9
N/A
N/A
Asian
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
100
8
58
25
8
91.7
N/A
N/A
13,043
99
30
39
23
7
86.8
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35,316
99
5
24
42
28
62.9
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
100
17
33
25
25
77.1
N/A
N/A
6,053
99
19
36
33
12
79.5
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
208
100
18
32
32
18
75.8
N/A
N/A
White
94
99
65
30
5
0
98.1
N/A
N/A
332
99
29
42
26
4
88.3
N/A
N/A
135,382
99
20
42
30
8
84.1
N/A
N/A
Male
52
98
62
31
6
2
96.6
N/A
N/A
182
99
28
37
27
7
86.0
N/A
N/A
106,211
99
17
37
33
14
78.4
N/A
N/A
Female
50
100
60
36
4
0
98.5
N/A
N/A
187
98
26
48
23
4
89.3
N/A
N/A
102,022
99
17
37
34
12
79.1
N/A
N/A
EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,822
98
1
8
39
51
45.3
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
100
10
50
30
10
80.0
N/A
N/A
33,065
99
8
25
40
27
64.2
N/A
N/A
All Students
2016
102
99
61
33
5
1
97.5
N/A
N/A
369
99
27
43
25
5
87.7
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2015
118
100
55
36
8
1
96.2
N/A
N/A
338
99
29
47
22
2
91.6
N/A
N/A
210,454
99
15
39
33
12
79.4
N/A
N/A
2016 Accountability Data - Littleton High School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
86
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
97
Met Target
High needs
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
99
Met Target
Littleton High School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.9
99.4
98.6
-0.8
99.4
99.5
61
104
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
98.8
99.3
99.0
-0.3
99.3
99.4
58
96
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.9
97.5
99.0
1.5
98.8
99.0
97
104
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
97.5
97.5
99.2
1.7
98.5
98.8
98
96
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.6
96.2
97.5
1.3
99.2
99.3
87
102
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
99.4
96.1
98.1
2.0
99.7
99.7
87
94
100
Above Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
66.7
68.3
104
0
0.8
0.0
104
25
High needs
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
66.4
69.8
96
0
0.9
0.0
96
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
78.3
81.7
104
0
1.7
0.0
104
25
High needs
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
79.1
83.3
96
0
1.8
0.0
96
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
55.1
60.8
102
25
0.8
1.0
102
0
High needs
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
56.5
64.9
94
25
0.9
0.0
94
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
52.5
56.0
3.5
51.0
No
99
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
18
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
54.0
56.0
2.0
51.0
No
91
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
63.0
70.0
7.0
51.0
Yes
99
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
51.0
-
18
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
61.5
69.0
7.5
51.0
Yes
91
100
Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
1
-
High needs
-
60.0
1
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
1
-
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.1
95.3
2.2
80.0
90.0
106
100
Above Target
High needs
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
25
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
16
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
2
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
3
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
92.8
95.9
3.1
80.0
90.0
98
100
Above Target
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2013 Rate
2014 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
91.3
93.1
1.8
85.0
95.0
101
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
34
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
25
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
White
93.2
92.8
-0.4
85.0
95.0
97
75
On Target
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
1.7
0.5
0.2
0.3
1.0
0.9
84
445
75
On Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
89
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
73
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
1.5
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.9
0.8
79
401
75
On Target
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
107
106
99
Yes
108
106
98
Yes
108
107
99
Yes
High needs
20
-
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
5
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
2
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
White
99
98
99
Yes
99
97
98
Yes
99
98
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.