Brian Denitzio, Principal Mailing Address: 19 Kennard Rd Brookline, MA 02445
Phone: (617) 879-4600 FAX: (617) 739-7505 Website: http://brookline.k12.ma.us
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
99.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
267
3,302
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
99.5
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.5
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
11.4 to 1
12.8 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
1.1
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
91
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
87
Met Target
High needs
75
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
65
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
98
Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black
75
Met Target
Hispanic/Latino
83
Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
100
Met Target
William H Lincoln: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
90.9
90.7
91.2
0.5
94.7
95.5
80
366
75
On Target
High needs
82.6
79.8
82.7
2.9
89.9
91.3
76
159
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
79.2
79.2
82.3
3.1
80.9
89.6
75
72
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
76.2
80.0
86.4
6.4
86.1
88.1
96
46
75
On Target
Students w/ disabilities
79.9
72.8
75.0
2.2
88.3
90.0
82
88
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
89.7
90.6
90.6
0.0
94.0
94.9
39
53
25
No Change
Afr. Amer./Black
78.6
76.5
77.4
0.9
87.5
89.3
55
41
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
78.9
81.4
87.3
5.9
87.7
89.5
84
53
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
96.4
90.7
89.4
-1.3
97.6
98.2
29
33
25
No Change
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
95.9
96.4
95.8
-0.6
97.6
98.0
87
186
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
87.7
87.1
88.5
1.4
92.8
93.9
83
364
75
On Target
High needs
75.8
72.1
75.5
3.4
85.9
87.9
76
157
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
70.4
70.4
68.0
-2.4
72.9
85.2
49
71
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
75.0
80.7
91.7
11.0
85.4
87.5
96
45
100
Above Target
Students w/ disabilities
70.1
56.3
62.8
6.5
82.6
85.1
76
88
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
94.9
93.8
98.6
4.8
97.0
97.5
91
52
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
68.6
67.6
73.8
6.2
81.7
84.3
77
41
50
Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino
67.2
71.6
74.0
2.4
80.9
83.6
67
52
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
90.5
85.2
86.4
1.2
93.7
95.3
36
33
50
Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
93.1
94.0
93.4
-0.6
96.0
96.6
87
186
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
83.2
91.2
82.9
-8.3
90.2
91.6
76
105
0
Declined
High needs
73.3
78.0
64.3
-13.7
84.4
86.7
68
42
0
Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
69.6
-
56.5
-9.2
82.3
84.8
68
27
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.3
96.9
91.2
-5.7
94.9
95.7
88
51
100
Above Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
34.6
29.8
366
0
4.8
3.6
366
25
High needs
13.2
9.4
159
0
11.8
8.2
159
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
10.8
9.7
72
0
13.8
11.1
72
25
EL and Former EL
11.4
10.9
46
0
11.4
2.2
46
25
Students w/ disabilities
8.9
4.5
88
0
17.7
13.6
88
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
37.5
32.1
53
0
6.3
5.7
53
0
Afr. Amer./Black
11.8
7.3
41
0
8.8
12.2
41
0
Hispanic/Latino
17.6
22.6
53
25
11.8
3.8
53
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
33.3
30.3
33
0
3.7
3.0
33
25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
43.6
36.0
186
0
1.7
1.1
186
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
43.4
44.8
364
0
8.4
7.1
364
25
High needs
22.1
22.3
157
0
20.6
16.6
157
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
16.9
14.1
71
0
23.1
21.1
71
0
EL and Former EL
37.1
48.9
45
25
14.3
2.2
45
25
Students w/ disabilities
8.9
11.4
88
25
34.2
28.4
88
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
60.4
71.2
52
25
6.3
1.9
52
25
Afr. Amer./Black
20.6
9.8
41
0
26.5
17.1
41
25
Hispanic/Latino
19.6
15.4
52
0
19.6
15.4
52
25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
37.0
39.4
33
0
0.0
12.1
33
0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
51.2
54.3
186
0
3.5
3.2
186
0
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
26.1
22.9
105
0
6.3
5.7
105
0
High needs
2.4
7.1
42
25
17.1
14.3
42
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Students w/ disabilities
8.6
3.7
27
0
25.7
22.2
27
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
16
-
-
-
16
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
35.4
33.3
51
0
0.0
2.0
51
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
70.0
71.0
1.0
51.0
No
254
100
Above Target
High needs
67.0
60.5
-6.5
51.0
No
102
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
70.0
60.0
-10.0
51.0
No
55
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
18
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
60.5
60.5
0.0
51.0
No
60
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
77.0
77.0
0.0
51.0
No
30
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
57.0
62.5
5.5
51.0
No
30
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
72.0
74.5
2.5
51.0
Yes
40
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
26
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
72.0
74.0
2.0
51.0
No
128
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
68.0
74.0
6.0
51.0
No
255
100
Above Target
High needs
64.0
67.0
3.0
51.0
No
101
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
57.0
62.0
5.0
51.0
No
54
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
18
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
60.0
73.5
13.5
51.0
Yes
60
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
66.0
73.5
7.5
51.0
Yes
30
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
68.0
66.0
-2.0
51.0
Yes
30
100
Above Target
Hispanic/Latino
52.0
68.0
16.0
51.0
No
39
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
68.0
70.5
2.5
51.0
Yes
26
100
Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
69.0
76.5
7.5
51.0
No
130
100
Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
85.0
60.0
35
25
High needs
85.0
60.0
35
25
EL and Former EL
85.0
60.0
35
25
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
383
382
100
Yes
381
380
100
Yes
108
108
100
Yes
High needs
176
175
99
Yes
174
173
99
Yes
45
45
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
75
75
100
Yes
74
74
100
Yes
23
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
60
60
100
Yes
59
59
100
Yes
10
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
89
88
99
Yes
89
88
99
Yes
27
27
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
61
61
100
Yes
60
60
100
Yes
12
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
41
41
100
Yes
41
41
100
Yes
13
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
58
58
100
Yes
57
57
100
Yes
17
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
33
33
100
Yes
33
33
100
Yes
15
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
190
189
99
Yes
190
189
99
Yes
51
51
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.