Matthew Janger, Principal Mailing Address: 869 Mass Avenue Arlington, MA 02476-0002
Phone: (781) 316-3591 FAX: (781) 316-3504 Website: http://www.arlington.k12.ma.us
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2016-17 School Year)
Note: School achievement percentiles (1-99) compare each group’s average scaled score to the average scaled scores of the same group from all public schools across the state. Only students enrolled in the same school since October 1 are included in calculations, and groups with fewer than 10 students do not receive percentiles.
2017 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants.
* Note: Grade 10 Science and Technology/Engineering results represent the highest achievement level attained by students by the end of grade 10. In addition, only students enrolled for two full years in the state/district/school are included in state/district/school achievement level results.
ALL GRADES - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
Student Group
School
District
State
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Stud. Incl
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
CPI
SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
#
%
A
P
NI
W
Subgroups
Students w/ disabilities
39
100
10
33
54
3
78.2
N/A
N/A
221
97
7
28
48
18
70.7
N/A
N/A
39,271
98
4
18
41
38
59.1
N/A
N/A
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
48
99
10
21
52
17
69.8
N/A
N/A
20,120
99
3
16
44
37
54.7
N/A
N/A
Econ. Disadvantaged
23
100
22
48
26
4
87.0
N/A
N/A
98
97
10
34
40
16
71.2
N/A
N/A
66,270
99
7
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
High needs
58
100
16
41
41
2
83.6
N/A
N/A
307
97
9
32
44
15
74.3
N/A
N/A
93,555
99
6
25
43
26
65.2
N/A
N/A
Afr. Amer./Black
13
100
8
23
69
0
75.0
N/A
N/A
40
100
8
23
55
15
72.5
N/A
N/A
17,823
99
6
25
43
26
64.6
N/A
N/A
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
460
98
10
31
40
20
71.6
N/A
N/A
Asian
36
98
42
47
11
0
96.5
N/A
N/A
116
99
33
38
25
4
87.7
N/A
N/A
13,554
100
30
38
25
7
86.1
N/A
N/A
Hispanic/Latino
19
96
47
42
11
0
96.1
N/A
N/A
71
95
18
34
38
10
81.0
N/A
N/A
37,380
99
6
24
42
27
63.2
N/A
N/A
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
22
100
55
32
14
0
95.5
N/A
N/A
58
98
33
36
28
3
87.5
N/A
N/A
6,659
99
20
35
33
13
79.1
N/A
N/A
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
174
99
16
31
34
19
74.6
N/A
N/A
White
226
99
49
41
10
0
96.2
N/A
N/A
890
99
32
43
21
4
90.1
N/A
N/A
133,323
99
20
41
31
8
83.6
N/A
N/A
Male
140
98
50
41
9
0
96.8
N/A
N/A
553
98
30
41
24
5
88.7
N/A
N/A
106,879
99
17
36
33
14
77.8
N/A
N/A
Female
176
99
44
40
15
1
94.2
N/A
N/A
623
99
30
41
25
4
88.4
N/A
N/A
102,501
99
17
37
34
12
78.8
N/A
N/A
EL
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24
100
4
8
67
21
61.5
N/A
N/A
11,915
98
1
7
40
52
43.7
N/A
N/A
Ever EL
29
100
28
45
28
0
92.2
N/A
N/A
111
99
14
33
43
10
77.9
N/A
N/A
34,852
99
8
25
40
26
64.4
N/A
N/A
Migrant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43
98
0
16
16
67
41.9
N/A
N/A
All Students
2017
316
99
47
41
13
0
95.3
N/A
N/A
1,176
99
30
41
24
5
88.5
N/A
N/A
209,416
99
17
36
34
13
78.3
N/A
N/A
2016
282
97
55
33
11
1
95.4
N/A
N/A
1,080
98
38
41
17
5
91.4
N/A
N/A
208,262
99
17
37
33
13
78.7
N/A
N/A
2017 Official Accountability Data - Arlington High
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
78
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
81
Met Target
High needs
79
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
60
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
89
Met Target
Arlington High: Accountability Data Detail
2017 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
98.6
99.1
99.3
0.2
99.3
99.3
76
330
100
Above Target
High needs
94.0
96.7
96.7
0.0
97.0
97.0
68
68
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
96.2
96.9
96.4
-0.5
96.8
98.1
58
28
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
97.1
98.2
95.1
-3.1
98.6
98.6
67
41
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
95.0
96.4
100.0
3.6
97.5
97.5
81
40
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
99.3
99.7
99.4
-0.3
99.7
99.7
72
232
100
Above Target
2017 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
97.4
97.4
97.5
0.1
98.7
98.7
83
325
100
Above Target
High needs
90.2
90.8
90.8
0.0
95.1
95.1
82
65
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
88.5
94.5
92.3
-2.2
90.4
94.3
83
26
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
91.2
86.3
88.8
2.5
95.6
95.6
84
38
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
97.6
100.0
98.8
-1.2
98.8
98.8
63
40
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
97.8
97.7
98.0
0.3
98.9
98.9
82
229
100
Above Target
2017 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2016 CPI
2017 CPI
CPI Change
2017 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
93.8
95.4
95.3
-0.1
96.9
96.9
70
316
25
No Change
High needs
79.3
85.9
83.6
-2.3
89.7
89.7
49
58
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
88.0
87.9
87.0
-0.9
90.0
94.0
63
23
25
No Change
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
77.5
79.4
78.2
-1.2
88.8
88.8
55
39
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
95.0
-
96.5
1.1
97.5
97.5
34
36
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
94.6
96.3
96.2
-0.1
97.3
97.3
69
226
75
On Target
2017 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
70.4
72.4
330
0
0.7
0.3
330
25
High needs
37.7
36.8
68
0
2.9
1.5
68
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
46.9
46.4
28
0
3.1
0.0
28
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Students w/ disabilities
26.8
29.3
41
0
0.0
2.4
41
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
76.2
72.5
40
0
4.8
0.0
40
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
73.7
76.3
232
0
0.0
0.0
232
25
2017 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
74.5
73.8
325
0
1.0
1.8
325
0
High needs
48.5
35.4
65
0
4.4
9.2
65
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
59.4
50.0
26
0
6.3
7.7
26
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Students w/ disabilities
35.0
21.1
38
0
5.0
10.5
38
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
76.2
77.5
40
0
0.0
0.0
40
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
21
-
-
-
21
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
78.5
78.2
229
0
0.8
1.7
229
0
2017 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2016 % Advanced
2017 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2016 % Warning/Failing
2017 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
55.3
46.5
316
0
0.7
0.3
316
25
High needs
23.4
15.5
58
0
1.6
1.7
58
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
32.3
21.7
23
0
0.0
4.3
23
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
15.0
10.3
39
0
2.5
2.6
39
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
51.9
41.7
36
0
3.7
0.0
36
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
13
-
-
-
13
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
57.5
48.7
226
0
0.4
0.4
226
0
2017 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
43.5
47.5
4.0
51.0
No
294
50
Below Target
High needs
36.0
38.0
2.0
51.0
No
55
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
48.5
49.0
0.5
51.0
No
23
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
27.0
35.0
8.0
51.0
No
35
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
48.0
33.5
-14.5
51.0
Yes
34
75
On Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
19
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
45.0
52.0
7.0
51.0
No
212
75
On Target
2017 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2016 SGP
2017 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
49.0
55.0
6.0
51.0
Yes
289
75
On Target
High needs
45.0
41.0
-4.0
51.0
Yes
54
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
47.0
41.5
-5.5
51.0
No
22
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
35.5
40.5
5.0
51.0
Yes
34
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
49.0
48.0
-1.0
51.0
No
33
50
Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
18
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
49.0
60.0
11.0
51.0
Yes
209
100
Above Target
2017 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2017 SGPA
2017 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
11
-
High needs
-
60.0
11
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
11
-
2016 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.5
98.1
3.6
80.0
90.0
318
100
Above Target
High needs
87.9
96.0
8.1
80.0
90.0
99
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
12
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
94.4
98.0
3.6
80.0
90.0
51
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
1
-
-
Asian
97.0
100.0
3.0
80.0
90.0
41
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
15
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
80.0
90.0
-
-
-
White
96.3
98.8
2.5
80.0
90.0
242
100
Above Target
2015 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2014 Rate
2015 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
94.9
95.2
0.3
85.0
95.0
311
100
Above Target
High needs
87.5
88.9
1.4
85.0
95.0
99
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
9
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
97.4
94.4
-3.0
85.0
95.0
54
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
-
-
-
Asian
100.0
97.0
-3.0
85.0
95.0
33
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
15
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
8
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
85.0
95.0
1
-
-
White
97.5
96.7
-0.8
85.0
95.0
242
100
Above Target
2016 Annual Dropout Rate
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Baseline Rate
2015 Rate
2016 Rate
Change
Annual Target
6 Year Goal
Dropout Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
1.5
0.6
0.0
0.6
0.8
0.8
97
1253
100
Above Target
High needs
2.2
2.1
0.0
2.1
1.1
1.1
95
234
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
1.9
1.9
0.0
1.9
1.7
1.0
89
103
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
2.3
3.8
0.0
3.8
1.2
1.2
91
131
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
3.4
0.8
0.0
0.8
1.7
1.7
64
134
100
Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
53
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
10.2
1.8
0.0
1.8
5.1
5.1
86
58
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
70
43
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
White
0.5
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.3
0.3
95
961
100
Above Target
2017 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target
All students
344
339
99
Yes
344
334
97
Yes
343
339
99
Yes
High needs
77
76
99
Yes
77
73
95
Yes
76
76
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
32
32
100
Yes
32
30
94
No
31
31
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
13
-
-
-
13
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
42
42
100
Yes
42
39
93
No
42
42
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
43
43
100
Yes
43
43
100
Yes
42
41
98
Yes
Afr. Amer./Black
14
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
26
25
96
Yes
26
25
96
Yes
26
25
96
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
23
23
100
Yes
23
22
96
Yes
23
23
100
Yes
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
238
234
98
Yes
238
231
97
Yes
238
236
99
Yes
NOTE: In 2017, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2017 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2017 participation rate was lower than 95 percent (high schools) or 90 percent (schools and districts administering Next-Generation MCAS test in grades 3-8) for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2017 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
