Albert F. Argenziano School at Lincoln Park (02740087)
Glenda Soto, Principal Mailing Address: 290 Washington Street Somerville, MA 02143
Phone: (617) 629-5460 FAX: (617) 629-5463 Website: http://www.somerville.k12.ma.us/argenziano Organization Description: K-8 Elementary School
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
99.7
98.6
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
207
1,846
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
98.2
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
1.8
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
14.6 to 1
11.7 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.7
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
2016 Accountability Data - Albert F. Argenziano School at Lincoln Park
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
57
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
69
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
61
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
67
Did Not Meet Target
Students w/ disabilities
42
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
58
Did Not Meet Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
55
Did Not Meet Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
92
Met Target
Albert F. Argenziano School at Lincoln Park: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
74.7
79.0
79.3
0.3
85.2
87.4
37
322
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
71.7
67.8
68.2
0.4
83.5
85.9
22
184
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
70.6
70.6
74.8
4.2
73.1
85.3
42
127
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
58.3
52.3
54.9
2.6
75.7
79.2
15
103
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
44.6
52.7
46.1
-6.6
67.7
72.3
12
45
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
79.3
77.4
86.2
8.8
87.9
89.7
26
38
50
Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
69.3
68.6
66.6
-2.0
82.1
84.7
16
137
25
No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
85.7
91.5
91.1
-0.4
91.7
92.9
62
121
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
68.8
72.6
76.0
3.4
81.8
84.4
50
321
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
66.5
62.9
66.3
3.4
80.5
83.3
42
183
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
66.3
66.3
70.0
3.7
69.1
83.2
57
126
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
59.5
55.7
59.2
3.5
76.4
79.8
34
103
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
45.2
48.4
43.8
-4.6
68.0
72.6
20
44
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
82.6
80.6
86.2
5.6
89.9
91.3
17
38
50
Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
62.7
63.5
64.6
1.1
78.2
81.4
32
137
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
75.3
82.3
86.9
4.6
85.6
87.7
65
120
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
64.8
74.5
66.8
-7.7
79.5
82.4
53
104
0
Declined
High needs
60.6
61.6
60.7
-0.9
77.0
80.3
57
63
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
69.4
69.4
64.6
-4.8
72.0
84.7
82
41
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
50.0
50.0
53.4
3.4
70.8
75.0
71
29
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
60.5
64.8
56.9
-7.9
77.0
80.3
59
40
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
67.5
88.3
76.2
-12.1
81.0
83.8
52
42
0
Declined
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
11.5
12.7
322
25
15.5
15.8
322
0
High needs
6.1
6.0
184
0
25.4
26.1
184
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
7.9
7.9
127
0
21.4
19.7
127
0
EL and Former EL
2.3
1.0
103
0
45.3
39.8
103
25
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
45
0
42.6
60.0
45
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
25.8
15.8
38
0
19.4
7.9
38
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Hispanic/Latino
3.6
3.6
137
0
24.8
29.2
137
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
17.4
22.3
121
25
3.7
4.1
121
0
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
23.0
26.5
321
25
22.6
19.6
321
25
High needs
14.8
16.4
183
25
32.4
29.0
183
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
16.5
20.6
126
25
29.9
23.8
126
25
EL and Former EL
8.0
9.7
103
25
40.2
36.9
103
0
Students w/ disabilities
6.4
2.3
44
0
51.1
59.1
44
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
38.7
42.1
38
0
9.7
5.3
38
25
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
19
-
-
-
19
-
Hispanic/Latino
11.7
14.6
137
25
32.8
32.1
137
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
31.2
37.5
120
25
11.9
9.2
120
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
9.6
3.8
104
0
17.0
15.4
104
0
High needs
5.6
1.6
63
0
29.6
22.2
63
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
5.6
0.0
41
0
13.9
14.6
41
0
EL and Former EL
0.0
0.0
29
0
53.8
34.5
29
25
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
11
-
-
-
11
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
14
-
-
-
14
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Hispanic/Latino
4.5
0.0
40
0
29.5
27.5
40
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
20.0
9.5
42
0
3.3
7.1
42
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
51.0
55.0
4.0
51.0
No
223
75
On Target
High needs
51.0
54.0
3.0
51.0
No
117
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
45.0
55.0
10.0
51.0
No
87
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
58.0
47.5
-10.5
51.0
No
52
50
Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
36.0
34.0
-2.0
51.0
No
29
25
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
25
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
53.0
48.5
-4.5
51.0
No
90
50
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
44.0
61.5
17.5
51.0
No
88
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
58.5
52.0
-6.5
51.0
Yes
225
75
On Target
High needs
61.0
54.0
-7.0
51.0
Yes
119
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
60.5
51.0
-9.5
51.0
Yes
89
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
66.0
54.0
-12.0
51.0
Yes
55
75
On Target
Students w/ disabilities
40.0
51.0
11.0
51.0
No
29
75
On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
25
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
63.0
48.5
-14.5
51.0
No
92
50
Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
50.0
57.0
7.0
51.0
Yes
87
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
47.0
60.0
125
0
High needs
47.0
60.0
125
0
EL and Former EL
47.0
60.0
125
0
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
355
354
100
Yes
355
353
99
Yes
112
111
99
Yes
High needs
217
216
100
Yes
217
215
99
Yes
71
70
99
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
147
147
100
Yes
147
146
99
Yes
46
45
98
Yes
EL and Former EL
133
133
100
Yes
132
132
100
Yes
36
36
100
Yes
Students w/ disabilities
47
46
98
Yes
47
45
96
Yes
12
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
43
43
100
Yes
43
43
100
Yes
15
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
22
-
-
-
22
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
157
157
100
Yes
159
159
100
Yes
46
46
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
8
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
125
124
99
Yes
124
122
98
Yes
43
42
98
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.