Milissa A Churchill, Principal Mailing Address: 40 Damon Avenue Melrose, MA 02176
Phone: (781) 979-2190 FAX: (781) 979-2194 Website: http://www.melroseschools.com
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
100.0
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
73
1,131
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
100.0
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
0.0
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
14.4 to 1
14.4 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.4
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.
2016 PARCC Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
Achievement Levels: L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699)
Trans. SGP = Transitional Student Growth Percentile
generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores Trans. CPI = Transitional Composite Performance Index
generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores
NOTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in 2016 PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. NOTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean CPI, but not in achievement level or growth results.
Data Last Updated on September 24, 2016
GRADE 3 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
--
82
99
5
59
21
10
6
87.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
35
100
9
51
23
11
6
87.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
--
16
100
0
75
13
6
6
91.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
5
--
--
48
98
4
50
25
13
8
84.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
13
100
38
46
8
8
0
96.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
10
91
10
60
20
0
10
90.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
40
100
23
75
0
0
3
98.1
--
--
227
100
18
65
11
4
2
95.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
22
100
9
91
0
0
0
100.0
--
--
145
99
14
65
15
4
2
94.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
23
100
39
57
0
0
4
96.7
--
--
122
99
25
61
9
4
2
95.3
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
40
100
28
73
0
0
0
100.0
--
--
219
100
22
66
10
2
0
97.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
42
100
26
71
0
0
2
98.2
--
--
232
99
20
65
11
3
1
96.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
--
15
100
0
73
13
7
7
90.6
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
--
18
100
11
67
11
6
6
92.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
45
100
24
73
0
0
2
98.3
--
--
267
99
19
63
12
4
2
94.9
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 3 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
9
--
--
82
99
12
48
23
11
6
87.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
--
35
100
6
46
29
14
6
84.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
--
16
100
19
38
31
13
0
89.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
5
--
--
48
98
10
46
23
15
6
85.0
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
--
13
100
54
38
0
8
0
96.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
3
--
--
10
91
10
60
20
10
0
92.5
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
1
--
--
7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
40
100
45
45
10
0
0
100.0
--
--
227
100
34
49
12
3
2
96.2
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
22
100
41
45
14
0
0
100.0
--
--
144
99
34
49
12
3
2
95.7
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
23
100
43
52
4
0
0
100.0
--
--
123
100
33
47
14
5
2
95.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
40
100
45
48
8
0
0
100.0
--
--
219
100
38
48
11
2
1
97.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
42
100
45
50
5
0
0
100.0
--
--
232
99
38
48
10
3
1
97.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
--
15
100
20
33
33
13
0
89.1
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
--
18
100
28
33
28
11
0
90.8
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
45
100
42
49
9
0
0
100.0
--
--
267
99
33
48
13
4
2
95.4
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
--
8
74
97
5
38
36
16
4
74.3
30.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
2
--
2
34
95
6
47
26
18
3
75.7
35.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
41
98
5
29
41
20
5
70.9
30.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
--
5
26
100
8
42
31
15
4
76.0
36.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
2
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
18
100
6
50
17
17
11
73.6
--
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
28
97
54
32
14
0
0
94.6
64.0
28
199
99
27
53
16
5
0
91.3
40.0
192
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
15
100
47
40
13
0
0
95.0
--
15
128
100
18
49
23
9
2
84.6
39.0
123
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
23
96
48
35
13
4
0
93.5
67.0
23
128
98
30
54
12
4
1
92.7
35.0
126
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
32
97
53
41
6
0
0
96.9
64.0
32
215
100
27
56
13
4
0
92.2
39.0
211
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
36
100
47
36
14
3
0
93.8
62.0
36
222
100
27
52
16
5
1
90.7
39.0
217
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
38
97
47
37
13
3
0
94.1
64.0
38
256
99
24
52
17
6
1
88.7
38.0
249
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 4 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
8
--
8
74
97
5
36
39
16
3
77.3
32.0
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
2
--
2
34
95
6
38
35
18
3
77.9
32.0
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
6
--
6
41
98
2
32
44
17
5
73.8
31.0
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
5
--
5
26
100
0
50
42
4
4
83.7
35.0
26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
2
--
2
6
--
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
1
--
1
18
100
11
28
50
11
0
72.2
--
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
7
--
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
28
97
36
50
11
4
0
93.8
75.0
28
199
99
19
59
16
6
1
91.9
45.0
193
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
15
100
40
40
13
7
0
90.0
--
15
128
100
12
56
23
8
2
88.1
38.0
124
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
23
96
30
61
9
0
0
97.8
80.0
23
128
98
22
55
17
5
1
91.7
49.0
126
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
32
97
38
59
3
0
0
99.2
75.0
32
215
100
20
60
15
4
0
93.1
46.0
211
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
36
100
33
53
11
3
0
94.4
68.0
36
222
100
18
59
18
5
1
91.8
45.0
218
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
38
97
34
53
11
3
0
94.7
69.0
38
256
99
17
56
20
6
1
89.9
43.0
250
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
14
93
0
43
50
7
0
87.5
--
14
78
99
4
55
32
8
1
88.5
49.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
3
--
3
33
97
6
58
24
9
3
87.9
52.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
11
92
0
36
55
9
0
84.1
--
11
48
98
2
50
38
8
2
85.9
40.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
--
3
17
100
0
65
29
0
6
91.2
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
13
100
15
77
8
0
0
98.1
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
11
100
27
55
9
9
0
93.2
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
36
97
11
67
22
0
0
96.5
30.0
36
201
100
20
64
13
2
0
96.8
59.0
193
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
22
100
0
64
32
5
0
93.2
24.0
22
127
100
12
64
20
3
1
94.3
54.0
121
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
20
95
20
65
15
0
0
97.5
39.0
20
121
99
26
64
9
2
0
97.9
65.0
113
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
100
13
74
13
0
0
99.2
38.0
31
200
100
23
67
10
1
0
98.5
60.0
188
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
39
100
10
64
23
3
0
94.9
29.0
39
215
100
20
65
13
1
0
97.3
59.0
207
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
42
98
10
64
24
2
0
95.2
29.0
42
248
100
19
64
15
2
0
96.1
59.0
234
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADE 5 Math
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
14
93
0
29
64
7
0
82.1
--
14
78
99
8
44
32
12
5
83.0
51.0
70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
4
--
4
34
100
9
41
32
12
6
83.1
43.0
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
11
92
0
18
73
9
0
77.3
--
11
48
98
6
40
33
13
8
79.2
53.0
46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
3
--
3
17
100
0
47
35
6
12
83.8
--
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
1
--
1
13
100
38
46
15
0
0
100.0
--
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
2
--
2
11
100
27
55
9
9
0
90.9
--
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
36
97
19
47
28
6
0
91.7
35.0
36
201
100
27
49
18
4
1
93.5
49.0
192
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
22
100
18
36
36
9
0
85.2
30.0
22
127
100
24
50
18
6
3
91.3
55.0
121
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
20
95
15
55
25
5
0
96.3
43.0
20
121
99
26
49
20
4
1
94.4
49.0
112
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
31
100
23
55
16
6
0
95.2
33.0
31
200
100
30
52
16
3
1
96.1
49.0
187
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
38
97
18
45
29
8
0
90.1
34.0
38
214
100
28
50
17
4
1
94.4
52.0
205
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
42
98
17
45
31
7
0
90.5
34.0
42
248
100
25
49
19
5
2
92.8
51.0
233
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 ELA/L
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
31
94
6
52
32
6
3
87.9
19.0
22
423
98
6
48
28
14
4
84.6
39.0
313
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
8
80
--
5
187
98
11
50
22
12
4
85.8
45.0
133
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
--
60
100
2
53
23
12
10
80.3
33.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
22
96
5
41
41
9
5
83.0
--
17
262
97
3
40
34
18
4
81.4
38.0
203
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
8
--
8
92
99
5
47
27
15
5
83.2
38.0
74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
3
68
100
37
47
9
6
1
95.0
61.0
50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
4
--
1
52
96
12
54
21
8
6
86.5
49.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
4
59
100
29
53
12
3
3
94.6
61.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
104
98
27
61
12
0
1
96.6
44.0
64
1,291
99
28
54
13
4
0
95.2
52.0
1,037
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
59
100
15
68
15
2
0
96.2
36.0
37
780
100
19
54
19
7
1
92.5
47.0
615
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
66
97
36
52
9
2
2
95.8
55.0
43
782
99
34
52
10
4
1
95.8
55.0
632
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
103
99
31
63
6
0
0
98.8
54.0
63
1,300
100
31
56
10
2
0
96.9
54.0
1,044
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
117
100
27
58
12
2
1
95.7
43.0
75
1,375
99
29
53
13
4
1
95.3
52.0
1,114
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
--
47
100
0
47
28
13
13
76.6
29.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
--
109
100
17
52
15
9
6
87.3
57.0
84
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
125
98
26
59
12
2
1
96.0
44.0
80
1,562
99
27
53
14
5
1
94.2
52.0
1,247
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
129
99
19
63
16
2
1
94.6
49.0
90
1,584
99
26
56
14
4
1
94.9
66.0
1,301
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRADES 3-8 MATH
Student Group
School
District
State
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
Included
Part. Rate
% at Each Level
Trans. CPI
Trans. SGP
Incl. in SGP (#)
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
#
%
L5
L4
L3
L2
L1
Subgroups
High needs
31
94
10
35
48
6
0
86.3
35.0
22
426
98
6
36
31
20
7
74.9
38.0
318
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Econ. disadvantaged
9
90
--
6
189
99
6
38
32
16
8
76.3
36.0
136
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL/Formerly ELL
1
--
--
60
100
7
33
35
18
7
75.0
38.0
38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/disablities
22
96
9
27
55
9
0
80.7
--
17
265
98
4
31
31
24
10
70.1
38.0
208
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
8
--
8
92
99
2
34
39
16
9
74.5
37.0
75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
--
3
67
99
40
43
7
6
3
92.8
62.0
49
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
4
--
1
53
96
9
42
36
11
2
81.6
52.0
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
--
4
59
100
17
51
15
14
3
83.8
54.0
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
104
98
34
47
16
3
0
95.4
57.0
64
1,287
99
20
53
19
6
2
90.7
47.0
1,032
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Male
59
100
32
41
22
5
0
91.9
40.0
37
774
99
17
50
22
8
3
88.5
43.0
611
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Female
66
97
30
56
12
2
0
98.1
66.0
43
784
99
21
51
19
7
2
90.0
50.0
632
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Disabled
103
99
36
53
9
2
0
98.3
58.0
63
1,293
99
22
55
18
4
1
93.4
49.0
1,035
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-Econ. disadvantaged
116
99
33
49
15
3
0
95.0
54.0
74
1,369
99
21
52
19
6
2
91.1
48.0
1,107
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ELL
1
--
--
47
100
6
26
38
21
9
71.4
38.0
27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ever ELL
1
--
--
107
98
17
39
26
13
5
82.3
48.0
82
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
All Students
2016
125
98
31
49
17
3
0
95.2
56.0
80
1,558
99
19
51
20
7
2
89.3
47.0
1,243
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2015
129
99
20
53
21
6
0
92.2
70.0
90
1,584
99
17
51
22
8
2
88.7
61.0
1,301
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016 Accountability Data - Horace Mann
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 1
Meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
68
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
95
Met Target
High needs
86
Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
91
Met Target
Horace Mann: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
89.4
94.6
96.0
1.4
93.8
94.7
98
125
100
Above Target
High needs
78.7
84.5
87.9
3.4
87.6
89.4
95
31
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
91.8
94.9
96.6
1.7
95.2
95.9
97
104
100
Above Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
82.4
92.2
95.2
3.0
89.7
91.2
94
125
100
Above Target
High needs
68.3
81.8
86.3
4.5
81.5
84.2
89
31
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
85.3
91.8
95.4
3.6
91.4
92.7
92
104
100
Above Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
77.0
78.2
80.2
2.0
86.6
88.5
48
43
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
77.7
78.0
83.8
5.8
87.0
88.9
44
37
50
Improved Below Target
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
28.7
34.4
125
25
2.3
0.8
125
25
High needs
2.7
9.7
31
25
8.1
3.2
31
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
28.0
36.5
104
25
2.8
1.0
104
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
42.6
56.8
125
25
3.1
1.6
125
25
High needs
21.6
19.4
31
0
8.1
3.2
31
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
22
-
-
-
22
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
43.0
58.7
104
25
2.8
1.9
104
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
8.5
11.6
43
25
8.5
7.0
43
25
High needs
-
-
15
-
-
-
15
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
9.8
13.5
37
25
9.8
5.4
37
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
48.5
44.0
-4.5
51.0
Yes
80
75
On Target
High needs
34.0
18.5
-15.5
51.0
Yes
22
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
50.0
44.0
-6.0
51.0
Yes
64
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
69.5
55.5
-14.0
51.0
Yes
80
75
On Target
High needs
56.0
35.0
-21.0
51.0
Yes
22
75
On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
4
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
69.5
56.5
-13.0
51.0
Yes
64
75
On Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
1
-
High needs
-
60.0
1
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
1
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
127
125
98
Yes
127
125
98
Yes
43
43
100
Yes
High needs
33
31
97
Yes
33
31
97
Yes
15
-
-
-
Econ. Disadvantaged
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
EL and Former EL
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
23
-
-
-
23
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
4
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
106
104
98
Yes
106
104
98
Yes
37
37
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.