Jeffrey T Gaglione, Principal Mailing Address: 201 Manning Street Hudson, MA 01749-1031
Phone: (978) 567-6210 FAX: (978) 567-6232 Website: http://www.hudson.k12.ma.us
This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
100.0
99.2
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
283
1,082
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
100.0
98.3
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
0.0
1.7
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
11.8 to 1
11.9 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
0.0
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
2016 Accountability Data - David J. Quinn Middle School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 2
Not meeting gap narrowing goals
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
57
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
67
Did Not Meet Target
High needs
72
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
-
Students w/ disabilities
57
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
70
Did Not Meet Target
David J. Quinn Middle School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
92.2
87.2
87.1
-0.1
95.5
96.1
35
633
25
No Change
High needs
82.0
73.4
73.5
0.1
89.5
91.0
19
215
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
77.4
77.4
77.7
0.3
79.3
88.7
23
129
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
84.8
72.0
74.1
2.1
88.6
92.4
54
54
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
75.6
62.6
63.2
0.6
85.8
87.8
32
104
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
85.2
79.1
73.8
-5.3
91.4
92.6
26
40
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
92.8
88.1
88.2
0.1
95.8
96.4
27
554
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
78.4
76.3
78.9
2.6
87.4
89.2
50
632
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
61.1
60.1
61.5
1.4
77.3
80.6
41
215
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
64.2
64.2
64.3
0.1
67.2
82.1
35
129
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
72.8
57.5
64.4
6.9
79.6
86.4
66
54
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
49.2
45.2
48.3
3.1
70.4
74.6
45
104
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
56.8
63.2
58.8
-4.4
74.8
78.4
24
40
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
White
79.3
77.6
80.7
3.1
87.9
89.7
46
553
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
74.8
75.7
74.1
-1.6
79.0
87.4
46
221
25
No Change
High needs
62.4
60.8
60.3
-0.5
68.7
81.2
48
78
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
59.7
59.7
64.1
4.4
63.1
79.9
56
46
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
54.3
54.5
53.9
-0.6
61.9
77.2
59
38
25
No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
75.9
77.3
75.7
-1.6
79.9
88.0
38
192
25
No Change
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
12.1
17.2
633
25
7.2
5.7
633
25
High needs
2.9
4.7
215
25
18.3
14.9
215
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
4.8
7.0
129
25
15.8
10.9
129
25
EL and Former EL
2.0
1.9
54
0
22.0
9.3
54
25
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
1.0
104
25
28.0
25.0
104
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Hispanic/Latino
2.7
7.5
40
25
13.5
12.5
40
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
12.7
17.3
554
25
6.4
4.9
554
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
22.1
23.9
632
0
16.7
13.3
632
25
High needs
10.0
6.5
215
0
35.4
30.7
215
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
12.3
8.5
129
0
29.5
27.9
129
0
EL and Former EL
2.0
1.9
54
0
36.0
24.1
54
25
Students w/ disabilities
4.8
2.9
104
0
55.2
46.2
104
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
-
Asian
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Hispanic/Latino
13.9
10.0
40
0
30.6
35.0
40
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
White
22.7
24.6
553
0
15.0
11.4
553
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
8.6
11.3
221
25
10.9
11.3
221
0
High needs
2.7
2.6
78
0
25.7
24.4
78
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
4.1
4.3
46
0
24.5
17.4
46
25
EL and Former EL
-
-
18
-
-
-
18
-
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
38
0
36.4
34.2
38
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
3
-
-
-
3
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
5
-
-
-
5
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
9.2
11.5
192
25
9.2
8.3
192
0
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
49.0
51.0
2.0
51.0
No
610
75
On Target
High needs
46.0
47.0
1.0
51.0
No
203
50
Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
46.0
47.0
1.0
51.0
No
123
50
Below Target
EL and Former EL
54.5
53.5
-1.0
51.0
No
50
75
On Target
Students w/ disabilities
43.0
44.5
1.5
51.0
No
100
50
Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
5
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
41.0
58.0
17.0
51.0
No
34
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
16
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
51.0
51.0
0.0
51.0
No
541
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
43.0
59.0
16.0
51.0
No
613
100
Above Target
High needs
41.5
59.0
17.5
51.0
No
205
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
41.0
58.0
17.0
51.0
No
125
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
46.5
70.0
23.5
51.0
No
50
100
Above Target
Students w/ disabilities
38.0
54.5
16.5
51.0
No
100
100
Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
2
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
6
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
11
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
46.5
58.0
11.5
51.0
No
34
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
17
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
1
-
-
White
44.0
58.5
14.5
51.0
No
542
100
Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
-
60.0
16
-
High needs
-
60.0
16
-
EL and Former EL
-
60.0
16
-
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
647
646
100
Yes
648
647
100
Yes
230
230
100
Yes
High needs
228
227
100
Yes
230
229
100
Yes
87
87
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
139
139
100
Yes
141
141
100
Yes
54
54
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
63
63
100
Yes
64
64
100
Yes
25
-
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
106
105
99
Yes
107
106
99
Yes
40
40
100
Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
2
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
7
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
12
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
44
44
100
Yes
45
45
100
Yes
16
-
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
18
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
563
562
100
Yes
563
562
100
Yes
196
196
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.
