This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students.
Enrollment and Educator Data (2015-16 School Year)
Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment
92.5
94.9
97.4
Total Number of Classes in Core Academic Areas
168
3,213
348,472
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified
95.2
93.1
96.3
Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Not Highly Qualified
4.8
6.9
3.7
Student/Teacher Ratio
16.6 to 1
14.3 to 1
13.2 to 1
Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers
-
7.5
0.9
2016 MCAS Results by Student Group by Grade and Subject
NOTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or CPI results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details.
2016 Accountability Data - Letourneau Elementary School
Accountability Information
Accountability and Assistance Level
Level 3
Among lowest performing 20% of schools and subgroups
Focus on Students w/disabilities -Hispanic/Latino -ELL and former ELL -
This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99)
All students:
16
Lowest performing
Highest performing
This school’s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100)
Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data)
On Target = 75 or higher -
Less progress
More progress
All students
75
Met Target
High needs
72
Did Not Meet Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
-
EL and Former EL
69
Did Not Meet Target
Students w/ disabilities
31
Did Not Meet Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
Asian
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
Hispanic/Latino
68
Did Not Meet Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
White
69
Did Not Meet Target
Letourneau Elementary School: Accountability Data Detail
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
68.5
63.5
70.6
7.1
81.6
84.3
10
216
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
66.0
59.9
66.5
6.6
80.2
83.0
14
176
50
Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
62.2
62.2
67.0
4.8
65.4
81.1
14
160
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
46.8
41.0
52.9
11.9
69.0
73.4
6
77
50
Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
58.2
40.3
51.7
11.4
75.6
79.1
17
29
50
Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
51.9
56.0
59.3
3.3
71.9
76.0
9
78
50
Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
73.5
72.6
79.5
6.9
84.5
86.8
14
100
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
65.9
68.9
70.9
2.0
80.1
83.0
10
218
50
Improved Below Target
High needs
63.4
67.0
67.0
0.0
78.7
81.7
17
178
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
66.8
66.8
67.1
0.3
69.6
83.4
16
162
50
Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL
49.1
66.0
57.0
-9.0
70.3
74.6
8
79
0
Declined
Students w/ disabilities
58.5
51.6
47.5
-4.1
75.8
79.3
11
30
0
Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
47.3
65.4
61.3
-4.1
69.3
73.7
13
80
0
Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
71.5
72.6
79.5
6.9
83.4
85.8
14
100
50
Improved Below Target
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Baseline CPI
2015 CPI
2016 CPI
CPI Change
2016 Target
6 Year Goal
CPI Percentile in School Type
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
61.4
61.0
58.2
-2.8
77.5
80.7
12
82
0
Declined
High needs
58.3
56.8
56.8
0.0
75.7
79.2
21
70
25
No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged
59.2
59.2
55.2
-4.0
62.6
79.6
27
62
0
Declined
EL and Former EL
33.3
-
-
-
-
66.7
-
37
-
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
41.7
-
-
-
-
70.9
-
32
-
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
66.1
68.0
66.9
-1.1
80.2
83.1
6
37
25
No Change
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
5.1
3.7
216
0
26.3
18.1
216
25
High needs
4.3
2.3
176
0
29.7
21.6
176
25
Econ. Disadvantaged
4.9
1.9
160
0
27.2
20.0
160
25
EL and Former EL
1.4
2.6
77
25
51.4
37.7
77
25
Students w/ disabilities
0.0
0.0
29
0
54.8
44.8
29
25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
Hispanic/Latino
2.4
2.6
78
0
30.1
32.1
78
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
6.4
6.0
100
0
19.1
8.0
100
25
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
12.0
16.1
218
25
20.7
20.6
218
0
High needs
10.8
12.4
178
25
22.2
24.2
178
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
11.1
12.3
162
25
21.6
24.7
162
0
EL and Former EL
9.7
10.1
79
0
20.8
35.4
79
0
Students w/ disabilities
3.2
3.3
30
0
45.2
43.3
30
0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Asian
-
-
10
-
-
-
10
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
20
-
-
-
20
-
Hispanic/Latino
10.8
8.8
80
0
19.3
33.8
80
0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
7
-
-
-
7
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
10.6
21.0
100
25
20.2
11.0
100
25
2016 Science Extra Credit
Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)
Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015 % Advanced
2016 % Advanced
N
PPI Points
2015 % Warning/Failing
2016 % Warning/Failing
N
PPI Points
All students
3.0
6.1
82
25
27.3
29.3
82
0
High needs
1.8
5.7
70
25
30.9
30.0
70
0
Econ. Disadvantaged
2.2
6.5
62
25
26.1
32.3
62
0
EL and Former EL
-
-
37
-
-
-
37
-
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
12
-
-
-
12
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
4
-
-
-
4
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
8
-
-
-
8
-
Hispanic/Latino
-
-
32
-
-
-
32
-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
0.0
5.4
37
25
24.0
16.2
37
25
2016 English Language Arts Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
54.0
60.5
6.5
51.0
No
130
100
Above Target
High needs
52.0
61.0
9.0
51.0
No
109
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
50.0
59.0
9.0
51.0
No
100
75
On Target
EL and Former EL
47.0
62.0
15.0
51.0
Yes
47
100
Above Target
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
43.0
66.5
23.5
51.0
Yes
48
100
Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
53.0
56.0
3.0
51.0
No
60
75
On Target
2016 Mathematics Growth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2015 SGP
2016 SGP
SGP Change
6 Year Goal
Met Safe Harbor?
N
PPI Points
Rating
All students
55.5
62.0
6.5
51.0
No
130
100
Above Target
High needs
57.0
60.0
3.0
51.0
No
109
100
Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged
57.0
60.5
3.5
51.0
No
100
100
Above Target
EL and Former EL
62.5
41.0
-21.5
51.0
No
47
50
Below Target
Students w/ disabilities
-
-
-
51.0
-
15
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
Asian
-
-
-
51.0
-
7
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
-
-
-
51.0
-
12
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
57.0
55.5
-1.5
51.0
No
48
75
On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
-
-
-
51.0
-
3
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
51.0
-
-
-
-
White
49.5
73.0
23.5
51.0
Yes
60
100
Above Target
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
2016 SGPA
2016 Target
SGPA N Included
PPI Points
All students
65.5
60.0
100
25
High needs
65.5
60.0
100
25
EL and Former EL
65.5
60.0
100
25
2016 Assessment Participation
English Language Arts
Mathematics
Science
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
Enrolled
Assessed
%
Met Target (95%)
All students
276
272
99
Yes
278
278
100
Yes
98
98
100
Yes
High needs
235
231
98
Yes
235
235
100
Yes
85
85
100
Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged
208
206
99
Yes
208
208
100
Yes
74
74
100
Yes
EL and Former EL
128
124
97
Yes
128
128
100
Yes
50
50
100
Yes
Students w/ disabilities
41
40
98
Yes
41
41
100
Yes
17
-
-
-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Asian
10
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
Afr. Amer./Black
25
-
-
-
25
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
Hispanic/Latino
115
113
98
Yes
115
115
100
Yes
42
42
100
Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.
8
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
White
117
115
98
Yes
117
117
100
Yes
40
40
100
Yes
NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.
2015 Massachusetts and Nationwide NAEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level
NAEP, or the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "Nation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the NAEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the NAEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html.
The following symbols are used to denote the NAEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero.
GRADE LEVEL 4 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
235
14
50
82
18
100
221
8
35
68
32
100
Stud. w/ Disab
209
2
20
55
45
18
186
2
12
33
67
13
LEP
200
1
12
44
56
9
189
1
8
32
68
11
African American/Black
217
3
25
65
35
7
206
2
18
51
49
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
249
31
68
89
11
6
238
19
53
81
19
5
Hispanic/Latino
215
3
25
61
39
19
208
3
21
54
46
26
White
242
17
58
89
11
65
232
11
46
79
21
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
220
5
29
67
33
42
209
3
21
56
44
55
GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
251
13
54
90
10
100
240
7
39
81
19
100
Stud. w/ Disab
231
4
25
74
26
18
217
2
16
54
46
13
LEP
223
2
17
65
35
9
218
1
15
57
43
11
African American/Black
230
1
26
73
27
7
224
1
19
65
35
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
273
38
81
98
2
6
256
22
61
90
10
5
Hispanic/Latino
232
3
28
74
26
19
230
3
26
73
27
26
White
256
15
62
95
5
65
248
10
51
90
10
49
Econ. Disadvantaged
236
4
31
80
20
42
229
2
24
72
28
55
GRADE LEVEL 8 - READING
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
274
6
46
83
17
100
264
3
33
75
25
100
Stud. w/ Disab
245
1
15
54
46
18
229
#
8
36
64
12
LEP
225
#
6
35
65
5
223
#
3
28
72
6
African American/Black
252
1
18
63
37
9
247
1
15
58
42
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
290
18
64
90
10
7
279
9
50
85
15
6
Hispanic/Latino
249
#
17
61
39
14
253
1
20
65
35
25
White
281
7
53
90
10
67
273
4
42
84
16
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
260
3
28
71
29
44
253
1
20
64
36
52
GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS
Student Group
Massachusetts
National Public
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
Avg. Scaled Score
% at Each Level
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
A
P+
B+
BB
% Assessed
All Students
297
18
51
81
19
100
281
8
32
70
30
100
Stud. w/ Disab
264
3
16
51
49
18
246
1
8
32
68
12
LEP
251
2
10
38
62
6
246
1
5
31
69
6
African American/Black
268
4
22
54
46
9
260
1
12
47
53
15
Asian/Pacific Islander
324
44
73
94
6
7
305
25
58
86
14
6
Hispanic/Latino
271
4
24
61
39
15
269
3
19
60
40
25
White
304
20
59
88
12
66
291
10
42
81
19
51
Econ. Disadvantaged
279
7
31
67
33
43
268
2
18
58
42
52
Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students
The NAEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all NAEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations.