• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 36 36 38 43 PROFICIENT 49 55 50 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 7 10 9 FAILING 6 2 3 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 52 54 53 58 PROFICIENT 25 29 25 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 14 15 13 FAILING 10 4 7 4

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 17 14 35 PROFICIENT 47 45 57 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 35 26 19 FAILING 8 2 3 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 27 22 12 PROFICIENT 65 58 60 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 13 15 17 WARNING 8 2 3 8

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 21 19 12 PROFICIENT 32 35 35 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 23 24 31 WARNING 23 21 22 24

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 2 1 2 PROFICIENT 23 42 32 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 40 49 49 WARNING 22 16 18 18

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 14 7 8 PROFICIENT 65 57 51 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 25 32 19 WARNING 4 4 10 7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 14 12 13 PROFICIENT 37 28 24 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 38 32 34 WARNING 21 20 33 30

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 12 16 12 PROFICIENT 49 50 57 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 27 21 29 WARNING 8 10 6 7

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 15 17 20 PROFICIENT 28 27 29 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 27 32 36 WARNING 20 31 22 22

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 14 16 13 PROFICIENT 46 49 47 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 29 29 24 WARNING 12 8 7 11

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 22 21 21 PROFICIENT 33 28 30 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 31 32 32 WARNING 22 19 17 17

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 17 12 13 PROFICIENT 31 31 27 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 38 47 38 WARNING 21 13 13 13

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 12 2 5 PROFICIENT 45 39 48 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 36 35 42 WARNING 12 13 15 10

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 12 13 20 PROFICIENT 25 31 33 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 50 38 42 42 WARNING 13 19 11 9

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 11 13 6 PROFICIENT 50 44 43 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 35 41 38 WARNING 9 10 4 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 25 27 23 PROFICIENT 46 37 35 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 23 26 23 WARNING 9 15 11 11

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.