• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 51 59 49 PROFICIENT 47 44 37 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 3 2 4 FAILING 1 1 2 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 58 52 58 56 PROFICIENT 22 31 23 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 14 13 14 FAILING 4 3 6 4

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 44 38 40 PROFICIENT 63 44 50 46 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 11 9 13 FAILING 2 1 2 2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 26 32 22 PROFICIENT 57 61 59 67 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 7 8 6 7 WARNING 3 5 3 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 24 28 29 PROFICIENT 30 36 40 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 24 22 19 WARNING 13 16 9 12

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 5 4 3 PROFICIENT 36 42 39 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 39 47 48 WARNING 13 15 10 10

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 21 13 10 PROFICIENT 60 63 70 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 11 13 15 WARNING 4 5 4 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 32 26 29 PROFICIENT 36 34 41 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 25 23 18 WARNING 16 9 10 15

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 30 18 20 PROFICIENT 49 52 62 62 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 13 13 13 WARNING 4 5 6 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 44 35 32 37 PROFICIENT 33 42 43 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 16 15 23 WARNING 6 7 10 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 19 21 26 PROFICIENT 58 52 56 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 23 14 16 WARNING 5 6 9 7

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 26 37 35 PROFICIENT 35 38 38 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 27 24 17 22 WARNING 9 11 8 8

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 19 21 22 PROFICIENT 44 36 34 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 36 34 29 WARNING 6 9 11 8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 12 11 19 PROFICIENT 50 54 55 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 24 25 28 WARNING 9 10 9 5

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 19 26 26 PROFICIENT 39 40 38 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 34 29 30 WARNING 9 7 7 5

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 22 15 19 PROFICIENT 61 50 53 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 23 27 24 WARNING 6 5 5 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 26 38 38 PROFICIENT 58 39 39 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 25 18 17 WARNING 4 11 5 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.