Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pentucket Regional Sr High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Pentucket Regional Sr High
Organization Information
District:Pentucket (07450000)School type:High School
School:Pentucket Regional Sr High (07450505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.2, Target = 98.4CPI = 99.2, Target = 98.4 97.3 99.3 99.2 -0.1 98.4 98.7 74184100Above Target
High needsCPI = 95.6, Target = 92.5CPI = 95.6, Target = 92.5CPI = 95.6, Target = 92.5 87.1 96.1 95.6 -0.5 92.5 93.6 5634100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.2, Target = 98.5CPI = 99.2, Target = 98.5 97.4 99.9 99.2 -0.7 98.5 98.7 62178100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.5, Target = 98.1CPI = 95.5, Target = 98.1CPI = 95.5, Target = 98.1 96.8 96.5 95.5 -1.0 98.1 98.4 7118325No Change
High needsCPI = 84.6, Target = 92.1CPI = 84.6, Target = 92.1CPI = 84.6, Target = 92.1 86.4 82.8 84.6 1.8 92.1 93.2 613450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.3, Target = 98.1CPI = 95.3, Target = 98.1CPI = 95.3, Target = 98.1 96.8 96.9 95.3 -1.6 98.1 98.4 5917725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.9, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.9, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.9, Target = 97.1 95.1 96.8 95.9 -0.9 97.1 97.6 7417875On Target
High needsCPI = 87.5, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.5, Target = 90.7CPI = 87.5, Target = 90.7 84.0 86.2 87.5 1.3 90.7 92.0 683250Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.8, Target = 97.2CPI = 95.8, Target = 97.2CPI = 95.8, Target = 97.2 95.2 96.7 95.8 -0.9 97.2 97.6 6617325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 73.3 66.31840 0.6 0.518425
High needs 40.6 41.2340 3.1 2.9340
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 73.8 65.71780 0.0 0.61780
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 71.2 60.11830 2.2 1.618325
High needs 28.1 35.33425 12.5 5.93425
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 72.0 59.31770 1.7 1.71770
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 48.9 41.01780 0.0 0.017825
High needs 17.2 25.03225 0.0 0.03225
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.8 39.91730 0.0 0.017325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 62.0 51.0 -11.0 51.0No17775On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 58.0 48.0 -10.0 51.0No3050Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 63.0 51.5 -11.5 51.0No17275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 58.0 54.5 -3.5 51.0No17675On Target
High needsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 43.0 54.5 11.5 51.0No3075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 58.0 54.0 -4.0 51.0No17175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.6, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.6, Target = 80 94.2 95.6 1.4 80.0 90.0205100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.7, Target = 80 86.7 89.7 3.0 80.0 90.05875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.034--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 95.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.9, Target = 80 93.8 95.9 2.1 80.0 90.0197100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 85 93.7 94.2 0.5 85.0 95.019075On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.7, Target = 85 87.5 86.7 -0.8 85.0 95.04575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.033--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.04--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 93.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.8, Target = 85 95.1 93.8 -1.3 85.0 95.017875On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.7, Target = 0.8 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.8 0.76276075On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0.8, Target = 2.5 4.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 2.5 2.17412375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------59--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------78--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.8 1.3 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.76772575On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18618599Yes18618398Yes18618599Yes
High needs363597Yes363495Yes363597Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20---20---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities21---21---21---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---4---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White17917899Yes17917799Yes17917899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles