Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Oxford

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Oxford

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Oxford (02260000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
38% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-04-34-14-
Mathematics achievement04-24-34-44-
Science achievement24----34----
Achievement total21267.52867.591247.55890.0
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-24----
Mathematics growth24-24-14----
Growth total4822.54822.53822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------04----
Extended engagement rate------14----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------51220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-24-04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------24----
Additional indicators total3410.02410.02810.00410.0
Weighted total2.610.3-2.57.6-6.210.7-4.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 25%-33%-58%-59%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan29%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
59%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage38%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-34-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement14-34-
Achievement total11267.5101247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-14-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total4822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---44-
Extended engagement rate---04-
Annual dropout rate---44-
High school completion total---81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion---34-
Additional indicators total3410.07810.0
Weighted total1.910.3-7.510.7-
Percentage of possible points 18%-70%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan18%
Weight of non-high school results:70%
70%
Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage34%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.1 496.5 -2.6 500.9 8350Declined
Lowest Performing 479.5 478.6 -0.9 483.9 1600Declined
High needs 490.5 487.7 -2.8 492.0 3680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.2 488.8 -3.4 493.8 3040Declined
EL and Former EL---- 24--
Students w/ disabilities---- 129--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino---- 90--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 38--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 500.8 498.1 -2.7 502.8 6760Declined

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.2 93.5 0.3 94.7 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing 86.3 85.2 -1.1 88.3 221No Change
High needs 86.8 88.4 1.6 88.7 563Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.3 89.6 1.3 90.1 483Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.5 92.5 -1.0 95.0 801No Change

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 495.7 493.9 -1.8 497.4 8350Declined
Lowest Performing 473.1 474.8 1.7 475.7 1602Improved Below Target
High needs 486.5 485.3 -1.2 488.0 3680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.1 487.3 -0.8 489.2 3040Declined
EL and Former EL---- 22--
Students w/ disabilities---- 128--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino---- 90--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 38--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 497.2 495.3 -1.9 498.9 6760Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.1 84.3 2.2 83.9 1073Met Target
Lowest Performing 47.5 55.7 8.2 50.3 224Exceeded Target
High needs 68.3 76.3 8.0 70.8 574Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 70.5 77.0 6.5 73.2 494Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.1 85.8 2.7 84.9 793Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.8 73.0 0.2 74.6 2952Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 63.8 61.7 -2.1 66.1 1221No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 65.5 62.6 -2.9 67.6 990Declined
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 38--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 74.6 75.2 0.6 76.4 2263Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.1 79.5 1.4 79.9 943Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 69.9 71.8 1.9 72.2 473Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 74.2 73.8 -0.4 76.3 401No Change
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 79.5 85.7 6.2 81.3 684Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.9 50.0 6692Below Target
Lowest Performing 42.2 50.0 1582Below Target
High needs 40.6 50.0 2762Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.8 50.0 2302Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 17--
Students w/ disabilities-- 89--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino-- 68--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 28--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 41.2 50.0 5492Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.4 50.0 912Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs 39.5 50.0 431Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.3 50.0 382Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.6 50.0 682Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 42.0 50.0 6692Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.6 50.0 1592Below Target
High needs 42.8 50.0 2762Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.3 50.0 2302Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 16--
Students w/ disabilities-- 89--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 13--
Hispanic/Latino-- 69--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 27--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-- 2--
White 41.6 50.0 5492Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 39.7 50.0 901Below Target
Lowest Performing-- 17--
High needs 36.7 50.0 431Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.7 50.0 391Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 3--
Students w/ disabilities-- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.2 50.0 672Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 88.8 88.1 -0.7 90.8 1010Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 78.6 84.4 5.8 82.7 644Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.6 85.0 7.4 82.1 604Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 0--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 90.5 89.8 -0.7 92.6 880Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 92.9 92.8 -0.1 94.5 1251No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 89.5 85.7 -3.8 93.0 560Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.7 85.7 -3.0 92.6 490Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.8 94.0 1.2 94.6 1162Improved Below Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.6 1.7 0.9 2.3 4064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 5.8 2.3 3.5 5.2 1744Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.2 2.7 4.5 6.5 1464Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 60--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 47--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.7 0.9 1.8 2.4 3274Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 7.7 6.9 0.8 6.6 1,1433Met Target
Lowest Performing 12.7 11.9 0.8 10.6 1602Improved Below Target
High needs 13.4 12.0 1.4 11.5 5013Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.4 15.1 -0.7 11.8 3500Declined
EL and Former EL---- 32--
Students w/ disabilities---- 178--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 26--
Hispanic/Latino---- 124--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 56--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 6.1 5.5 0.6 5.1 9233Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 27.2 28.0 -0.8 26.1 4540Declined
Lowest Performing 30.0 40.9 -10.9 27.9 220Declined
High needs 40.1 34.7 5.4 38.2 2164Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.3 36.8 4.5 38.7 1524Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 74--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 55--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 26.1 26.1 0.0 25.1 3491No Change

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.4 55.9 1.5 59.0 2112Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 30.4 36.9 6.5 37.4 843Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 35.9 37.0 1.1 45.0 732Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 58.0 58.9 0.9 63.1 1682Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 956 94299Yes 1 954 94299Yes 1 411 40498Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 435 42497Yes 1 433 42598Yes 1 184 18098Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 360 35298Yes 1 358 35399Yes 1 150 14999Yes 1
EL and Former EL 29 2897Yes 1 27 27100Yes 1 15----
Students w/ disabilities 150 14496Yes 1 148 14397Yes 1 67 6496Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 1----
Asian 10---- 10---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 9----
Hispanic/Latino 111 10796Yes 1 109 10899Yes 1 58 5798Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 46 4598Yes 1 46 4598Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 2---- 2---- 2----
White 765 75699Yes 1 765 75599Yes 1 312 30698Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Alfred M ChaffeeInsufficient data
Clara BartonNot requiring assistance or intervention
Oxford HighNot requiring assistance or intervention
Oxford MiddleNot requiring assistance or intervention
Project C.O.F.F.E.E.Insufficient data

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles