Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Pioneer Charter School of Science II

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Pioneer Charter School of Science II (PCSS-II)

Organization Information

District:

Pioneer Charter School of Science II (PCSS-II) (District) (35060000)

School type:

Middle-High School or K-12

School:

Pioneer Charter School of Science II (PCSS-II) (35060505)

Grades served:

07,08,09,10,11

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Insufficient data

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.7	95.5	98.5	3.0	93.9	96.4	95	187	100	Above Target
High needs		90.7	91.5	97.4	5.9	92.3	95.4	95	96	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		93.2	93.2	99.6	6.4	93.8	96.6	97	65	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	40	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		88.4	91.8	98.1	6.3	90.3	94.2	90	67	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		95.0	95.0	99.2	4.2	95.4	97.5	94	31	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.6	98.5	98.1	-0.4	94.7	96.8	92	65	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.6	86.9	92.5	5.6	83.0	89.8	92	187	100	Above Target
High needs		75.0	79.6	87.2	7.6	79.2	87.5	94	96	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.2	87.2	90.0	2.8	88.3	93.6	94	65	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	40	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		66.3	82.7	91.0	8.3	71.9	83.2	87	67	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		87.5	87.5	81.5	-6.0	88.5	93.8	75	31	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.6	89.5	97.3	7.8	86.3	91.8	96	65	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.6	80.4	86.4	6.0	78.8	87.3	82	112	100	Above Target
High needs		66.7	72.1	78.7	6.6	72.3	83.4	86	47	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.5	82.5	86.8	4.3	84.0	91.3	97	34	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		59.8	73.5	79.8	6.3	66.5	79.9	82	42	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		85.2	85.2	94.6	9.4	86.4	92.6	97	37	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.4	35.3	187	25	1.2	0.5	187	25
High needs	10.3	17.7	96	25	2.9	1.0	96	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.6	24.6	65	25	2.1	0.0	65	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	40	-	-	-	40	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	19.7	26.9	67	25	3.3	1.5	67	25
Hispanic/Latino	20.0	25.8	31	25	0.0	0.0	31	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	22.0	43.1	65	25	0.0	0.0	65	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	47.6	46.5	187	0	9.6	3.7	187	25
High needs	31.4	28.1	96	0	15.7	7.3	96	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	38.8	35.4	65	0	6.1	6.2	65	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	40	-	-	-	40	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	32.3	38.8	67	25	14.5	3.0	67	25
Hispanic/Latino	46.7	35.5	31	0	13.3	12.9	31	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	58.0	53.8	65	0	6.0	1.5	65	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.8	17.0	112	25	14.0	6.3	112	25
High needs	2.3	12.8	47	25	18.6	14.9	47	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.3	17.6	34	25	3.3	5.9	34	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8.8	9.5	42	0	17.6	9.5	42	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	14.8	29.7	37	25	11.1	2.7	37	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	71.5	5.5	51.0	Yes	144	100	Above Target
High needs		60.0	73.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	77	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.0	80.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	51	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	34	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		57.5	69.5	12.0	51.0	Yes	52	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		74.0	74.5	0.5	51.0	No	48	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.0	79.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	145	100	Above Target
High needs		77.5	79.0	1.5	51.0	Yes	77	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.5	82.0	2.5	51.0	Yes	51	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	34	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		75.0	73.0	-2.0	51.0	Yes	52	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		86.0	75.5	-10.5	51.0	Yes	48	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	11.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	11.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	11.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.0	0.0	2.3	-2.3	0.0	0.0	27	86	0	Declined
High needs		0.0	0.0	2.8	-2.8	0.0	0.0	37	36	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	25	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		4.4	-	-	-	-	2.2	-	45	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	188	187	99	Yes	188	187	99	Yes	113	113	100	Yes
High needs	97	96	99	Yes	97	96	99	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	65	65	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	40	40	100	Yes	40	40	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	15	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	15	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	67	67	100	Yes	67	67	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	65	65	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.